Post Your Dyno #'s And Mods!
Instead of whining over which dyno is more efficient, do some research. You will find out the DynoPack is newer technology, safer, more consistent and more efficient than the old archaic roller types.
Did you ever think the roller types may read a little lower because it is a poor and archaic means of gathering data?
Do yourself a favor and find a shop with a DynoPack and get a more consistent and accurate reading.
Did you ever think the roller types may read a little lower because it is a poor and archaic means of gathering data?
Do yourself a favor and find a shop with a DynoPack and get a more consistent and accurate reading.
Originally Posted by silversurfer05,Sep 15 2008, 11:18 AM
Instead of whining over which dyno is more efficient, do some research. You will find out the DynoPack is newer technology, safer, more consistent and more efficient than the old archaic roller types.
Did you ever think the roller types may read a little lower because it is a poor and archaic means of gathering data?
Do yourself a favor and find a shop with a DynoPack and get a more consistent and accurate reading.
Did you ever think the roller types may read a little lower because it is a poor and archaic means of gathering data?
Do yourself a favor and find a shop with a DynoPack and get a more consistent and accurate reading.
Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Sep 15 2008, 03:39 PM
Dyno numbers should only be used to measure gains made from the addition of parts and tuning. It is absolutely pointless to try and compare one dyno to another. At the end of the day the only thing that matters is what the car runs at the track.




