S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Post Your Dyno #'s And Mods!

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #421  
silversurfer05's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Instead of whining over which dyno is more efficient, do some research. You will find out the DynoPack is newer technology, safer, more consistent and more efficient than the old archaic roller types.

Did you ever think the roller types may read a little lower because it is a poor and archaic means of gathering data?

Do yourself a favor and find a shop with a DynoPack and get a more consistent and accurate reading.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 10:48 AM
  #422  
kutsujula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Default

Isnt that the dyno that goes to the hub?

I think the TQ difference is compression difference though.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #423  
c_me_go's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,330
Likes: 13
From: Under the sun
Default

what is your compression?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 11:06 AM
  #424  
kutsujula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Default

stock
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #425  
2QYK4U's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by silversurfer05,Sep 15 2008, 11:18 AM
Instead of whining over which dyno is more efficient, do some research. You will find out the DynoPack is newer technology, safer, more consistent and more efficient than the old archaic roller types.

Did you ever think the roller types may read a little lower because it is a poor and archaic means of gathering data?

Do yourself a favor and find a shop with a DynoPack and get a more consistent and accurate reading.
Dyno numbers should only be used to measure gains made from the addition of parts and tuning. It is absolutely pointless to try and compare one dyno to another. At the end of the day the only thing that matters is what the car runs at the track.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #426  
silversurfer05's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

Originally Posted by 2QYK4U,Sep 15 2008, 03:39 PM
Dyno numbers should only be used to measure gains made from the addition of parts and tuning. It is absolutely pointless to try and compare one dyno to another. At the end of the day the only thing that matters is what the car runs at the track.
I wish I would have thought of that comment. I just get tired of individuals bickering over dyno numbers.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 06:26 PM
  #427  
passmans2kny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
From: huntington long island
Default

the torque could also be bc i have a 2.2
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #428  
c_me_go's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,330
Likes: 13
From: Under the sun
Default

did you do a a swap?
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 05:21 AM
  #429  
kutsujula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Default

he has a 04.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 03:58 PM
  #430  
s2kadrenalin's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,509
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane
Default

305rwhp @ 8.6 psi
Dyno Dynamics dyno

- Comptech Supercharger
- Comptech Aftercooler
- 9PSI SOS Pulley
- RC750cc injectors
- AEM 1052U
- K&N 3" Pod Filter
- Toda headers
- Invidia Test Pipe
- Invidia V3
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.