S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

S/C'd gone Turbo....WHY?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 04:49 AM
  #51  
bigpurp's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,831
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Sarek,Apr 17 2007, 02:29 AM
It seems that most who turbo their S's are weekend warriors.
This is a common misconception: https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.ph...f=142&t=431495.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 05:19 AM
  #52  
CourageOO7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,170
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Default

Originally Posted by Sarek,Apr 17 2007, 02:29 AM
is this true? i was debating to go inline pro or Vortech for my Daily driven S. This comment/post may have deterred me a little. Is there a need for constantly tinkering with a turbo setup to keep it working under "normal" daily driving (non track) conditions?
i've been following many threads and every other day I'm deciding on one or the other...

Does anyone have a lot of miles clocked with a reliable turbo? It seems that most who turbo their S's are weekend warriors. If anyone has alot of miles without any problems or constantly fixing things, this would put to rest some of the reliability concerns that some would have when deciding between turbo/SC.
By and large, turbo setups take about a year to of constant work to get the kinks out. If it's not a boost control problem it's bolts loosening or a manifold cracking...

I don't think many people would recommend turbo'ing your car if it's a daily driver or track driven. HOWEVER, for ultimate speed there is simply no other way to go on this platform. The difference in the way our motor reacts to turbocharging vs. supercharging really is amazing...

That's not to say there aren't fast supercharged cars. Sideways found a good amount of HP running a smaller pulley (I think it makes about 14psi) and getting his head professionally built. But, power definitely comes more easily from a turbo setup.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 07:23 AM
  #53  
S2KB00ST's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Default

Turbo is just as reliable as SC is you choose your parts correctly, install and tune it properly. Cheap parts and half assed install will no doubt put a dent in your reliability giving the misconception that turbos are not reliable..

Its a moot argument as to which is better really cos at the end of the day it depends on the individual what their preferences are and what they want to achieve. If all out power is what you want putting everything aside then turbo is the way to go. If you know that more is never enough like most turbo owners here, then turbo will be your best option
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 09:41 AM
  #54  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by .MM,Apr 17 2007, 02:24 AM
i love turbos, but you guys are totally missing the pro's of the SCer

im still undecided what root to take with my S, but SC has crossed my mind for a few reasons...even as much as i love the turbo feel, im afraid it will ruin the S...

1.SC is much more reliable for track racing than turbo charging the S.

2.SC keeps the wonderful NA sound and adds some nice whishing sounds

3.SC is subtle and doesnt have a huge front mount that looks retarded on an S

4.SC keeps the stock powerband

5.SC is quiter at IDLE and less likely to get you an exhaust ticket for gently cruising around town

6.SC is easier to uninstall later on

7.SC can make up around 400whp and realistically, unless we are talking a drag racing car, the SC will actually provide better throttle response for cornering, although less down low torque

8.A SCed S against a turboed S with similar power on an actual autoX course or race track would have different results IMO than a ****ing drag race on the street

9.i think you guys are too biased

Turbo cars pin you against the seat, yes, but gobs of torque isnt always want everyone cares about, even though it is a nice thing to have

10.if you daily drive your S 50-100 miles a day and race on weekends, the turbo wont be very reliable, where the SC will be
I'll number your comments so I can respond to some of them.

1. This actually hasn't been proven. Everyone just assumes that a turbo is "unreliable" but I think only ONE person has ever regurally tracked his car with a turbo. Granted, he apparently had issues BUT I've 1. never seen the thread 2. no one has any idea what parts he was using, power levels, etc, so its basically a bunch of BS until I've seen that.

2.This is all subjective. I personally think the turbo exhaust / engine noise sounds so much better then a SC but thats just me. Also the turbo blow off sounds 10 times nicer and louder but, again, thats me.

3. You can easily hear the SC rattling,clanking, whistling when stopped...not to subtle to me? Also some people will put the black grill peices on so you can hardly notice the IC (just looks like a radiator).

4.Have you seen a dyno graph of a GT35R turbo on a s2k? My horsepower is almost 100% linear and my torque stays nearly as flat as a plateau. If ANYTHING, a turbo makes the powerband of a s2k perfect...

5. A supercharged car is a GOOD BIT louder then a turbocharged car is at idle AND driving / wot. Why do you think SRT-4s can get away with no mufflers yet still pass noise regulations? (hint, turbo acts as a muffler).

6. Probably so

7. Another common misconsception, turbo lag doesn't exist in this car especially if you get a GT30 turbo. You just have to get used to the gobs more power that the turbo will put out for cornering; that doesn't make it worse, it makes it faster thus better. You'll need to get some thicker rubber though

8. Right, the turbo would beat it even more . In a full racetrack where you have nice long straightaways, sweeping corners, and regular corners the SC will die, no question about that. MAYBE in the autox, the SC will win because your taking little corners back and forth 4 feet apart and at 30mph so traction becomes a problem with downlow torque. Given equal drivers and equal grip, the turbo would kill it however.

9. Maybe

10. I disagree. If you install the turbo correctly, get the proper RELIABLE parts, and get a good tune, there is no reason why your car can't be reliable as well as a DD + weekend track car.


People need to get these unreliable misconsceptions out of there heads. Because one kit was fairly unreliable does NOT mean all kits are
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #55  
afwfjustin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,423
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

^AMEN !
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #56  
S_NeWb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: statesville
Default

5. SC is much louder in than turbo when it come to exhaust noise. At Idle Vortech sound like its going to break down. I am more afraid of getting a ticket with my exhaust now then i was turbo charged.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 11:12 AM
  #57  
CourageOO7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,170
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Apr 17 2007, 12:41 PM
I'll number your comments so I can respond to some of them.

1. This actually hasn't been proven. Everyone just assumes that a turbo is "unreliable" but I think only ONE person has ever regurally tracked his car with a turbo. Granted, he apparently had issues BUT I've 1. never seen the thread 2. no one has any idea what parts he was using, power levels, etc, so its basically a bunch of BS until I've seen that.

2.This is all subjective. I personally think the turbo exhaust / engine noise sounds so much better then a SC but thats just me. Also the turbo blow off sounds 10 times nicer and louder but, again, thats me.

3. You can easily hear the SC rattling,clanking, whistling when stopped...not to subtle to me? Also some people will put the black grill peices on so you can hardly notice the IC (just looks like a radiator).

4.Have you seen a dyno graph of a GT35R turbo on a s2k? My horsepower is almost 100% linear and my torque stays nearly as flat as a plateau. If ANYTHING, a turbo makes the powerband of a s2k perfect...

5. A supercharged car is a GOOD BIT louder then a turbocharged car is at idle AND driving / wot. Why do you think SRT-4s can get away with no mufflers yet still pass noise regulations? (hint, turbo acts as a muffler).

6. Probably so

7. Another common misconsception, turbo lag doesn't exist in this car especially if you get a GT30 turbo. You just have to get used to the gobs more power that the turbo will put out for cornering; that doesn't make it worse, it makes it faster thus better. You'll need to get some thicker rubber though

8. Right, the turbo would beat it even more . In a full racetrack where you have nice long straightaways, sweeping corners, and regular corners the SC will die, no question about that. MAYBE in the autox, the SC will win because your taking little corners back and forth 4 feet apart and at 30mph so traction becomes a problem with downlow torque. Given equal drivers and equal grip, the turbo would kill it however.

9. Maybe

10. I disagree. If you install the turbo correctly, get the proper RELIABLE parts, and get a good tune, there is no reason why your car can't be reliable as well as a DD + weekend track car.


People need to get these unreliable misconsceptions out of there heads. Because one kit was fairly unreliable does NOT mean all kits are
Spec,

So you wouldn't hesitate to do 10 hot laps around a circuit? You are telling me you don't have any issues with heat? This is not what I've been reading. In fact, there's another thread where a guy wants to drive his car from CO. to TX (I think) while turbo'd. Plently of owners advised him against it due to the heat the car will develop on such a long trip.

How can this be headed off? From what I have read this simply appears to be the nature of the beast. Again, MSM is the only guy I have read about that has built a circuit-driver turbo car. Again, if there was a turbo kit that was truly bolt on, no tinkering, no heat-related issues, etc...I think it would be a no brainer and this argument would no exist. It simply doesn't exist from what I've seen.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #58  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

Originally Posted by .MM,Apr 17 2007, 02:24 AM
i love turbos, but you guys are totally missing the pro's of the SCer

im still undecided what root to take with my S, but SC has crossed my mind for a few reasons...even as much as i love the turbo feel, im afraid it will ruin the S...

1. SC is much more reliable for track racing than turbo charging the S.

2. SC keeps the wonderful NA sound and adds some nice whishing sounds

3. SC is subtle and doesnt have a huge front mount that looks retarded on an S

4. SC keeps the stock powerband

5. SC is quiter at IDLE and less likely to get you an exhaust ticket for gently cruising around town

6. SC is easier to uninstall later on

7. SC can make up around 400whp and realistically, unless we are talking a drag racing car, the SC will actually provide better throttle response for cornering, although less down low torque

8. A SCed S against a turboed S with similar power on an actual autoX course or race track would have different results IMO than a ****ing drag race on the street

9. i think you guys are too biased

10. Turbo cars pin you against the seat, yes, but gobs of torque isnt always want everyone cares about, even though it is a nice thing to have

11. if you daily drive your S 50-100 miles a day and race on weekends, the turbo wont be very reliable, where the SC will be
1. Got some stats to back that up? A good turbo kit, properly installed and tuned will be just as reliable.

2. Exhaust sounds are completely subjective. Sound alone cannot be used as a positive or negative for either type of FI.

3. I have yet to meet anyone who thinkgs my intercooler is retarded. Then again, its all subjective so this point cannot be used as a positive or negative.

4. A SC does NOT keep the stock powerband. What dyno plots are you looking at? The closest I've seen that maintains a relatively stock powerband is the SOT/BRP kit. That isn't even officially released yet.

5. A turbo car will most likely be SIGNIFICANTLY quieter at IDLE. I'm willing to bet that my car is quieter than almost all centrigual supercharged S2000s across the entire engine range.

6. How so? No crank pully for my turbo kit. Turbo manifolds aren't exactly rocket science. I'd say they are about even.

7. A proper turbo setup will dominate a supercharged setup everywhere. Period.

8. It's pretty common knowledge that power isn't the best solution for an autocross beast. A road track would be a different story.

9. Biased towards the better of the two forms of forced induction, perhaps. More efficient, more power capabilities, better mid-range torque, etc.

10. Cost spent on turbo kit: $8,000
Cost spent on S/C kit: $6,000
Not having to downshift in the turbo car to destroy the S/C car: priceless

11. Really? Thats what I do and well I'll be damned if it isnt running perfectly.


Without data to back your claims, your statements have zero credibility.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #59  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

[QUOTE=CourageOO7,Apr 17 2007, 02:12 PM] Spec,

So you wouldn't hesitate to do 10 hot laps around a circuit?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #60  
CourageOO7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,170
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Default

Hmm...Well said. Spec, can you please list your setup for those of us whom would be interested in building a fast, reliable track car...done right.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:41 PM.