S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

SOS vs Kraftwerks

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #41  
GrandMasterKhan's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 17
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

if your not looking to upgrade then the KW kit will provide the most WHP of any bolt on s/c kit out of the box.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 10:01 AM
  #42  
gravesdu_99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Potsdam, NY
Default

Yeah i just read the installation of a clutch. May as well wait and do the clutch and rearend first and then have the kit installed.

How many people are running the sos sport clutch (255wheel ft/lb or tq) This sounds like it would be right now the edge. What else would be good for a daily driver.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #43  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by gravesdu_99,Nov 12 2009, 10:03 AM
So throwing upgradeability out the window it sounds like people would go with the KW kit. I've already done the horsepower race with my old supra. Thats why I don't care about having a lot of hp. Just something so that I can get out of my own way.

I would love to buy that kit. Although I don't think the banks would give me another loan this year. I just bought a new aquatrax and a slightly used pontoon boat.

Would I be smart to buy the Highboost kit and then upgrade my clutch once it finally burns out. Or will it be out the window right from the start. I rarly drive the car hard.
A stock S does that.

But I have to say being at about 350whp myself, it does the job nicely. I could make use of 400/450whp though, but my bank account cant. I'd like knowing I could hold my own against any exotic. Its in my nature to want to keep improving the car though so I would hate knowing that my kit was maxed right out of the box like the KW -- or over maxed from what it sounds like.

Also as far as the clutch, the ap2 PP has significantly less holding capacity then the early Ap1's 00-01. Not sure about 02-03 since I havent had the opportunity to use this yet. The ap2 also has a CDV which adds wear to the clutch, so keep this in mind,. I don’t know what year you have. If you go ahead and decide to do a clutch, don’t forget to put in a lightened flywheel, 8lb Findanza works awesome, been running the same one for ever on my N/A f20/ boosted f20 and now my boost f22, not only does it extend the life of your main bearings and free up additional response/hp, but also removed some of the duty from the friction plate effectively increasing grip force and extending clutch life. This is all stuff that seems to be debatable for a given application but I have experimented with over the years on my s2000 and can confirm.

The rear end isn’t necessary at the power you will be pushing, save your money. If you’re going to compete in drag racing every weekend then forget what I said.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 10:33 AM
  #44  
gravesdu_99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Potsdam, NY
Default

The stock s does get up and go. Sometimes I can't believe that it takes 14 seconds to do the 1/4 mile.

I think at 350whp the car will be at the limits of drivabilty and road skating (melting the tires thru the gears).

I'm going to order this kit in the spring. Are their any know problems with the kit as of right now.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 10:39 AM
  #45  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by gravesdu_99,Nov 12 2009, 11:33 AM
The stock s does get up and go. Sometimes I can't believe that it takes 14 seconds to do the 1/4 mile.

I think at 350whp the car will be at the limits of drivabilty and road skating (melting the tires thru the gears).

I'm going to order this kit in the spring. Are their any know problems with the kit as of right now.
Actually 350whp sounds like allot, and compared to stock it is, but if your like most of us, after about a month you will have had the chance to run it through its paces and see where its weaknesses are and want more. At 350whp 1st gear is pretty useless without some nice sticky 255's. But by no means is it too much for the street, if this is your idea then you may be disappointed when you find out you cant upgrade your KW and have to sell it like some guys have. Just food for thought.

About 450whp SC is when you start really running into traction issues in the first 3 gears, but sill nothing that couldn’t be helped with some fatter sticky tires. You should talk to Sideways about his 475whp Vortech set up and see what his impressions are. I think he still only runs 255's. Turbo is a bit different animal, since more trq is made at a much lower rpm, breaking traction is more of an issue. SC is way more tractable overall, however with an SC, since it builds more power as rpms climb, once you do get in a situation where you start to break the tires lose, it will just keep spinning more and more so it can be a bit harry, whether as a v8 or turbo hits a flat line in trq curve and may just maintain a consistent loss of traction. Just breaking it down for you so you know better what to expect hahaha
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 11:10 AM
  #46  
gravesdu_99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Potsdam, NY
Default

Thanks for the info. This will be my first supercharged car so it is a whole different animal like you said. You gave me some information to think about, but I still think that I will go with this kit. I want something that has reliablity and once I start upgrading most of that is out the window anyways. From reading around 400whp is the breaking point. That is the breaking point of my bank account. So this should be good. If I want a drag car I'll go with a different chassis. Maybe a 70 chevelle. I appreiate all the info though.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 11:21 AM
  #47  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #48  
rosscoe21's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Gray/Johnson City
Default

My Khumo Ecsta MXCs hold 350 excellent. I get some wheelspin up top in first and a tad from first to second. Too bad they are discontinued.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #49  
bagherra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 459
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Q8s2k,Nov 12 2009, 08:37 AM
Did you ask for the 3.4 pulley or is it standard with the Stage 2 kit ??..

Why dont you try the 3.2 pulley ??
3.6 came standard, I got the 3.4 after the fact. I probably should have gone with 3.2...I have quite the pulley collection going right now.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #50  
06S2k07Si's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 47
From: Baraboo, WI
Default

[QUOTE=Mother,Nov 12 2009, 07:36 AM] Graves, what year is your car?

If it's 06+, then any price difference between the SOS and the KW is quickly eaten up by additional mods or add ons needed for the sos to make the same power as the KW. (The 364.8 hp dyno on the SOS site is made with a $1500 J's header and a $1300 T1R exhaust).

If you read the D Sport article, even with the SOS making more peak power they still liked the KW better during the track test.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 PM.