The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.

Package from Bulletproof - ASM Intake

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 03:22 PM
  #191  
HvRRZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,645
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

man seriously this needs to stop. It sounds like the typical NA freaks in here, I don't understand why you think NA is so amazing. For one fact our 4cyl. Na cars don't even make that much power, although I do love the power they make. It looks like some people once again are running out of things to say, and are reapeting themselves, or playing of like they've won an argument. jakub they just don't understand, or maybe thy do not want to see it the way we would.

A turbo S I think in any situation is going to out perform a NA S. Ok, let's start the argument on this one now, NA freaks
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 03:39 PM
  #192  
ASMspec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,214
Likes: 2
From: West Coast
Default

Originally Posted by HvRRZ,Oct 17 2005, 03:22 PM
man seriously this needs to stop. It sounds like the typical NA freaks in here, I don't understand why you think NA is so amazing. For one fact our 4cyl. Na cars don't even make that much power, although I do love the power they make. It looks like some people once again are running out of things to say, and are reapeting themselves, or playing of like they've won an argument. jakub they just don't understand, or maybe thy do not want to see it the way we would.

A turbo S I think in any situation is going to out perform a NA S. Ok, let's start the argument on this one now, NA freaks
Some of us had turbod Hondas and are speaking from experience man. Come on now... You should know this..
If you want to go faster, bottom line, then you should have bought a faster car.
IMO this car is fast enough in OEM trim for 90% of the US drivers..I personally dont care for boosted Hondas anymore. Thats me. They just dont impress me anymore. You guys love them and will preach till your hearts content that they are so much better. Thats fine you can buy/live with what you want and we will buy and live with what we want.. Free country buddy..
One is not better than the other as some of you think so badly..Thats a fact.
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #193  
73Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,078
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by HvRRZ,Oct 17 2005, 04:22 PM
jakub they just don't understand, or maybe thy do not want to see it the way we would.
At the same time, you and jakub fail to understand that it's HIS money, and he can very well do what he wants with it...I mean, why make such a big deal out of what a person does with his/her own cash...it's what they wanted, they could afford it, so they went ahead and got it...let it go...

Time and time again in this thread, you two have REPEATEDLY bashed medicalstudent (and other owners) for spending so much on a part which gives "so-so" gains, compared to other comparably priced mods...

Originally Posted by HvRRZ,Oct 17 2005, 04:22 PM
A turbo S I think in any situation is going to out perform a NA S. Ok, let's start the argument on this one now, NA freaks
if you FI guys wanna have a pissing match with the NA folks in here, just take it to PM already, and spare the rest of us...


Jeez people, let this guy share his new toy with the S2K community...you've already stated your opinions long ago, and as justified as you feel, at this point you two are just beating a dead horse...this isn't going anywhere...

Cheers
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 03:52 PM
  #194  
HvRRZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,645
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JsAP1,Oct 17 2005, 04:39 PM
Some of us had turbod Hondas and are speaking from experience man. Come on now... You should know this..
If you want to go faster, bottom line, then you should have bought a faster car.
IMO this car is fast enough in OEM trim for 90% of the US drivers..I personally dont care for boosted Hondas anymore. Thats me. They just dont impress me anymore. You guys love them and will preach till your hearts content that they are so much better. Thats fine you can buy/live with what you want and we will buy and live with what we want.. Free country buddy..
Wow something I can agree on with you.

I love NA honda's more then the next guy, but I've always(and I really don't know why) loved a well built turbo engine. I myself am still debating about staying NA or turboing myself, but everything is making me lean toward the turbo option. I just find that it'll benefit me, and the car, in all the areas I'm looking for. although if I go NA then I wouldn't mind having 14 compression, fully tuned with itb's. oooooo sounds sexy
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 03:55 PM
  #195  
73Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,078
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by JsAP1,Oct 17 2005, 04:39 PM
Some of us had turbod Hondas and are speaking from experience man. Come on now... You should know this..
If you want to go faster, bottom line, then you should have bought a faster car.
IMO this car is fast enough in OEM trim for 90% of the US drivers..I personally dont care for boosted Hondas anymore. Thats me. They just dont impress me anymore. You guys love them and will preach till your hearts content that they are so much better. Thats fine you can buy/live with what you want and we will buy and live with what we want.. Free country buddy..
One is not better than the other as some of you think so badly..Thats a fact.
AMEN
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 03:55 PM
  #196  
WyattH's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,106
Likes: 2
From: PNW
Default

I think they can boost cars because they like the S2000 for other reasons besides for speed. Sure if they wanted a faster car they could have bought one that was faster stock, but it wouldn't have the looks, handling, or charisma of the S2000. So to combine all of their preferences/requirments in a car, they think it needs FI. Im fine with that, I plan on going SC personally but I can support NA as well.
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 03:57 PM
  #197  
WyattH's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,106
Likes: 2
From: PNW
Default

And CHEERS to Jsap1: "One is not better than the other as some of you think so badly..Thats a fact. "
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #198  
ASMspec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,214
Likes: 2
From: West Coast
Default

Originally Posted by WyattH,Oct 17 2005, 03:55 PM
wouldn't have the looks, handling, or charisma of the S2000. So to combine all of their preferences/requirments in a car, they think it needs FI.
Its called the new 2006 Chevy Corvette.
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 04:07 PM
  #199  
Presidente's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 15,176
Likes: 0
From: Under Construction
Default

Originally Posted by Kodokan_4,Oct 17 2005, 02:38 PM


If your esophagus looks like that, what PLANET are you from?

It's the AEM that looks like an esophagus! (tube-like)

I can't believe medicalstudent didn't say anything!

-Pete
well it conects to the stomach and therefore completes that look, sorry.
Old Oct 17, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #200  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

Originally Posted by JsAP1,Oct 18 2005, 09:39 AM
Some of us had turbod Hondas and are speaking from experience man.
Some of us have turbo S2000s. If you think an S2000 is 'just another Honda' you are mistaken.

[QUOTE=JsAP1,Oct 18 2005, 09:39 AM]If you want to go faster, bottom line, then you should have bought a faster car.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:45 PM.