Help with AFR
#41
going back to my original question.
yes i understand that ECU by itself or with the VAFC does NOT compensate for Fuel at WOT/Open loop mode - the VAFC is only useful in this "Window condition".
The VAFC modifies the MAP signal in order to achieve its fuel enrichment or cut settings. The VAFC is only connected to the MAP sensor input and vtec solenoid output and NOT the injectors directly. By modifying the MAP signal, Fuel AND Ignition timing are permanently altered by the VAFC (at least fuel is?) because the ecu doesnt compensate for Fuel? during the Window condition.
My question is, so what if the engine made detectable knock during the Window. The ecu would step in a retard timing DURING the window or not? Can fuel cutting with the VAFC lead to knock from the timing change?
I understand that this is a limitation with the VAFC - it cannot Independently modify timing and fuel, but it does actually modify both with a Functional relationship.
yes i understand that ECU by itself or with the VAFC does NOT compensate for Fuel at WOT/Open loop mode - the VAFC is only useful in this "Window condition".
The VAFC modifies the MAP signal in order to achieve its fuel enrichment or cut settings. The VAFC is only connected to the MAP sensor input and vtec solenoid output and NOT the injectors directly. By modifying the MAP signal, Fuel AND Ignition timing are permanently altered by the VAFC (at least fuel is?) because the ecu doesnt compensate for Fuel? during the Window condition.
My question is, so what if the engine made detectable knock during the Window. The ecu would step in a retard timing DURING the window or not? Can fuel cutting with the VAFC lead to knock from the timing change?
I understand that this is a limitation with the VAFC - it cannot Independently modify timing and fuel, but it does actually modify both with a Functional relationship.
#42
Registered User
Originally Posted by H22toF20' timestamp='1304061201' post='20519883
[quote name='JUSTINTHECOASTIE' timestamp='1303997753' post='20516454']
ECU DOES NOT COMPENSATE AT WOT
ECU DOES NOT COMPENSATE AT WOT
[/quote]
You are referring to open loop vs closed loop. Mostly the ECU won't make adjustments at WOT, sense it's in open loop; it literally doesn't read off the O2 anymore. But the fact that a VAFC can alter fuel(and timing) by altering the MAP signal, proves that SOME adjusting is going on during WOT.
#43
Originally Posted by JUSTINTHECOASTIE' timestamp='1304078477' post='20520265
[quote name='H22toF20' timestamp='1304061201' post='20519883']
[quote name='JUSTINTHECOASTIE' timestamp='1303997753' post='20516454']
ECU DOES NOT COMPENSATE AT WOT
[quote name='JUSTINTHECOASTIE' timestamp='1303997753' post='20516454']
ECU DOES NOT COMPENSATE AT WOT
[/quote]
You are referring to open loop vs closed loop. Mostly the ECU won't make adjustments at WOT, sense it's in open loop; it literally doesn't read off the O2 anymore. But the fact that a VAFC can alter fuel(and timing) by altering the MAP signal, proves that SOME adjusting is going on during WOT.
[/quote]
Is it noticable?
#44
Registered User
^I've never used a VAFC and wouldn't know how to read the adjustments in timing.
I know it's counter productive, but I wonder if you can hook one up with an EMS and datalog the differences in timing and pulse width.
I know it's counter productive, but I wonder if you can hook one up with an EMS and datalog the differences in timing and pulse width.
#45
OP get your numbers pulled and go from there, we gave you ideas to work with and our experience(s)
#46
Don't forget that when leaning out via a VAFC2 etc (ie via the map sensor method) you advance timing inadvertantly...not good especially F/I but also potential dangerous even when N/A. You may get away with it depending on how far you push it and your car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SecondRound
S2000 Modifications and Parts
13
03-07-2008 09:23 PM