S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum Discussions about N/A motor projects, builds and technology.

my f24 309 whp

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-17-2019, 11:58 AM
  #131  

Thread Starter
 
rednikos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 1,200
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

k24 is good but don’t have fast revving like f22 and f20
Old 05-09-2020, 11:08 PM
  #132  

Thread Starter
 
rednikos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 1,200
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default


Old 05-09-2020, 11:11 PM
  #133  

Thread Starter
 
rednikos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 1,200
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

i m working on a new motor now.
f22 crankshaft
ap2 rods
88 pistons
toda b2 cams
toda cam gears
at power itbs
toda header
modulo exhaust
hfc 200 cells
Old 05-11-2020, 05:24 AM
  #134  

 
xBoostx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 401
Received 72 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Awesome man. Just went through your thread. Yea your rods were prob to heavy.
Im doing a 2.5 build. But i am expecting fast revs. I went pretty wild with the internals setup.
Old 05-11-2020, 05:28 AM
  #135  

Thread Starter
 
rednikos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: greece
Posts: 1,200
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

yes rods was toooooo heavy .
i have second thought just a back up plan .
f20 with lightweight toda pistons
for fast reeving but not much power like f22
Old 05-11-2020, 08:10 AM
  #136  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

All of this lightweight internals talk is in vain if your not going to bolt up the lightest flywheel you can find.

The factory F20/F22 engine/ internals are great with an 8lb flywheel bolted up to it.
The following users liked this post:
rednikos (05-11-2020)
Old 05-11-2020, 08:30 AM
  #137  

 
xBoostx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 401
Received 72 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
All of this lightweight internals talk is in vain if your not going to bolt up the lightest flywheel you can find.

The factory F20/F22 engine/ internals are great with an 8lb flywheel bolted up to it.
Thats not true at all. The bearing and wrist pin load are greatly reduced which is the reason i sought to lose mass on the rotating assembly.

I am in the middle of deciding 8 or 11 pound flywheel myself. I leaning towards 8lb to compliment what I did in the rotating assembly.
Old 05-11-2020, 08:42 AM
  #138  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xBoostx
Thats not true at all. The bearing and wrist pin load are greatly reduced which is the reason i sought to lose mass on the rotating assembly.

I am in the middle of deciding 8 or 11 pound flywheel myself. I leaning towards 8lb to compliment what I did in the rotating assembly.
If you spend the money and time building a engine with aftermarket lightweight rods and pistons and then bolt up an 11lb flywheel to it instead of an 8lb, you just negated the whole point. Your working against yourself. If you want the engine to rev up and down fast and free the flywheel has just as much influence on this as the internal engine parts, however the flywheel is the low hanging inexpensive fruit and the engine components are the last thing you would focus on because they are the most expensive and have the least amount of weight savings. Period end of story. Just trying to help you out here. Don't waste your time and money on the engine unless your going to take it all the way. If it were me, id leave the stock engine alone and just run the 8lb flywheel, its a beautiful combo I run with no shortage of free revving responsiveness over stock and it will also reduce some load stresses on the mains too. But you have to weigh out your main focus here. The factory internals are capable of 9k rpm for several hundred K as oem designed. You building the engine to take 10k+ rpm? If not, internals are the last thing that should be on your mind.

Last edited by s2000Junky; 05-11-2020 at 08:50 AM.
Old 05-11-2020, 09:02 AM
  #139  

 
xBoostx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 401
Received 72 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
If you spend the money and time building a engine with aftermarket lightweight rods and pistons and then bolt up an 11lb flywheel to it instead of an 8lb, you just negated the whole point. Your working against yourself. If you want the engine to rev up and down fast and free the flywheel has just as much influence on this as the internal engine parts, however the flywheel is the low hanging inexpensive fruit and the engine components are the last thing you would focus on because they are the most expensive and have the least amount of weight savings. Period end of story. Just trying to help you out here. Don't waste your time and money on the engine unless your going to take it all the way. If it were me, id leave the stock engine alone and just run the 8lb flywheel, its a beautiful combo I run with no shortage of free revving responsiveness over stock and it will also reduce some load stresses on the mains too. But you have to weigh out your main focus here. The factory internals are capable of 9k rpm for several hundred K as oem designed. You building the engine to take 10k+ rpm? If not, internals are the last thing that should be on your mind.
Maybe you should jump on my thread so we dont post about my build on his thread.
Old 05-11-2020, 09:27 AM
  #140  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xBoostx
Maybe you should jump on my thread so we dont post about my build on his thread.
Just felt I should throw my 02. Food for thought to anyone.


Quick Reply: my f24 309 whp



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 AM.