Bilstein
With low speed rebound I think I would end up loosing traction over smaller bumps where with high speed it'll eliminate the over extension that I'm getting over certain bumps. low speed rebound feels ok as of now but I still have more driving to do.
A larger brake or end stack washer is what I'd want to do so I don't really change the way the stack works right now on low speed.
I do need to reduce compression a bit in the rear so maybe that'll help reduce the hop that I'm getting. It might just be an issue of comp vs rebound percentage split?
It rides smooth and has really good control especially in front and I think if I take out a bit of rear compression it might be fine.
A larger brake or end stack washer is what I'd want to do so I don't really change the way the stack works right now on low speed.
I do need to reduce compression a bit in the rear so maybe that'll help reduce the hop that I'm getting. It might just be an issue of comp vs rebound percentage split?
It rides smooth and has really good control especially in front and I think if I take out a bit of rear compression it might be fine.
That's what I did but you were saying it was too much compression. Maybe there was confusion?
I'm guessing I've doubled my low speed compression over what I was running on with the last revalve and steady state traction has increased.
Rebound = traction killer on the backside of the bumps
Less bump from what I have now but I still have way more bump than before.
I'm guessing I've doubled my low speed compression over what I was running on with the last revalve and steady state traction has increased.
Rebound = traction killer on the backside of the bumps
Less bump from what I have now but I still have way more bump than before.
Originally Posted by macr88,Nov 25 2010, 08:41 PM
That's what I did but you were saying it was too much compression. Maybe there was confusion?
I'm guessing I've doubled my low speed compression over what I was running on with the last revalve and steady state traction has increased.
Rebound = traction killer on the backside of the bumps
Less bump from what I have now but I still have way more bump than before.
I'm guessing I've doubled my low speed compression over what I was running on with the last revalve and steady state traction has increased.
Rebound = traction killer on the backside of the bumps
Less bump from what I have now but I still have way more bump than before.
I'm not convinced that the suspensions reaction to bumps is anyway related to rebound.
Over extension of your suspension sounds like a chassis issue and should be approached from the rebound, or spring, side of things.
If you could make both your bump and rebound curves more digressive I think you might like the results.
Originally Posted by robinson,Nov 25 2010, 08:02 PM
I don't remember telling you anything about your valving before the last post, but I have been following your progress.
I'm not convinced that the suspensions reaction to bumps is anyway related to rebound.
Over extension of your suspension sounds like a chassis issue and should be approached from the rebound, or spring, side of things.
If you could make both your bump and rebound curves more digressive I think you might like the results.
I'm not convinced that the suspensions reaction to bumps is anyway related to rebound.
Over extension of your suspension sounds like a chassis issue and should be approached from the rebound, or spring, side of things.
If you could make both your bump and rebound curves more digressive I think you might like the results.
Originally Posted by robinson,Nov 25 2010, 08:02 PM
I'm not convinced that the suspensions reaction to bumps is anyway related to rebound.
Any ideas on how to make a shimstack more digressive?
Does a thicker base shim create a more digressive curve?
I have no idea how to valve any shock, I just know what I want the dyno to look like.
What I'm trying to say about bumps and bump (compression) is that they are directly related and I don't think rebound plays much into how the shock reacts to bumps.
What I'm trying to say about bumps and bump (compression) is that they are directly related and I don't think rebound plays much into how the shock reacts to bumps.
Rebound can prevent certain hops after bumps. Just imagine a damper without any rebound and what the car would do.
I know that the tires can't hold the car down but I think high speed rebound can control the spring a bit better and prevent the overshoot without having too much low speed.
Let me know if my thinking is wrong.
I know that the tires can't hold the car down but I think high speed rebound can control the spring a bit better and prevent the overshoot without having too much low speed.
Let me know if my thinking is wrong.



