S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Bye Bye Bilstein Hello Ohlins

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 23, 2011 | 03:56 PM
  #111  
Beau@Performance Shock, Inc.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 1
Default

No worries. Yes, we made sure that we were not travel limited in the rear....there is plenty of stroke. Yes, that is why we use the piggyback on the rear and not an inline reservoir like the fronts.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2011 | 06:16 PM
  #112  
Antonov's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 3
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by Beau@Performance Shock, Inc.,Feb 23 2011, 04:56 PM
No worries. Yes, we made sure that we were not travel limited in the rear....there is plenty of stroke. Yes, that is why we use the piggyback on the rear and not an inline reservoir like the fronts.
Sweet. Thanx
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 07:06 PM
  #113  
poorb0yw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
From: Fujisawa, Japan
Default

Out of curiosity, what is the extended vs compressed length on these and stock? Can't seem to find numbers on stock units anywhere.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 07:15 PM
  #114  
macr88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,847
Likes: 10
From: Emmett
Default

Originally Posted by poorb0yw,Feb 24 2011, 08:06 PM
Out of curiosity, what is the extended vs compressed length on these and stock? Can't seem to find numbers on stock units anywhere.
http://www.modified.com/features/sccp_0806..._reservoir.html
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 07:48 PM
  #115  
poorb0yw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
From: Fujisawa, Japan
Default

Originally Posted by macr88,Feb 24 2011, 08:15 PM
Awesome, thanks for the link.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 08:41 PM
  #116  
macr88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,847
Likes: 10
From: Emmett
Default

You're welcome
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 07:47 AM
  #117  
macr88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,847
Likes: 10
From: Emmett
Default

Front 5lbs 7.4oz less spring
Name:  6a9ef750.jpg
Views: 128
Size:  152.7 KB

With spring 7lbs 11.3oz
Name:  33abb194.jpg
Views: 125
Size:  130.3 KB

These are 2lbs 2oz lighter than SRC's and 3lbs 9oz lighter than KWV3 CS's
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2011 | 10:41 PM
  #118  
jah29's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by macr88
These are 2lbs 2oz lighter than SRC's and 3lbs 9oz lighter than KWV3 CS's
How much does the stock set-up weigh? - I don't know enough to decide if that's a significant weight loss Ohlins has achieved...

thanks for posting all the photos and info. These are now on my short list for 2011
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2011 | 01:30 PM
  #119  
EternalLx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 1
From: Bergen County, NJ
Default

Oems are very very heavy
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2011 | 08:40 PM
  #120  
macr88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,847
Likes: 10
From: Emmett
Default

Rear 5lbs 2.6oz less spring
Name:  73d500b6.jpg
Views: 126
Size:  143.6 KB

With spring 7lbs 8.4oz
Name:  5b586047.jpg
Views: 122
Size:  156.6 KB


These are 2.5lbs lighter than KWV3 CS and .5lbs lighter than Tein SRC's
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:26 PM.