Engine mounts
I have a set of the 85A ones for my race car. Vibration was bad at first but it's decreased a little over time and it decreases further as the car warms up. I bought them to help keep the shifter in place better to prevent misshifts. Kinda works, but I still misshift (always up thankfully) about once every 30-40 track miles driven.
I'm not a great shifter. For street I like row-your-own but for track I long for paddle shift or a sequential.
I'm not a great shifter. For street I like row-your-own but for track I long for paddle shift or a sequential.
Seems the 75A is the popular choice.
My understanding is that the durability of the Innovative mounts is due to design, while torque damping is affected by the compound used.
Does anyone have experience with the 65A compound?
I'm more interested in the longevity of the mount rather than stiffness.
@momo: didn't know you had a puck clutch
I just like to preemptively address issues before they blow up
My understanding is that the durability of the Innovative mounts is due to design, while torque damping is affected by the compound used.
Does anyone have experience with the 65A compound?
I'm more interested in the longevity of the mount rather than stiffness.
@momo: didn't know you had a puck clutch
I just like to preemptively address issues before they blow up
No I don't; but I don't know anyone who actually uses one either, so it's not something I've really considered. With OEM engine mounts, I'm not sure that it is super beneficial to have one point that is much more solidly mounted compared to the rest of the engine and trans. Please correct if I'm mistaken.
Myself and others had issues with the 60A compound deforming over time. I switched to the 75A and haven't had the same problem. It is a good bit harsher though and I wouldn't want it in a street driven car.
I'm on the fence between the 60A and 75A; my only complaint about my exhaust is the vibration it adds (although, I think that's a function of the exhaust ever so slightly touching the exhaust tunnel).
Originally Posted by goldenfri' timestamp='1310147867' post='20760281
Myself and others had issues with the 60A compound deforming over time. I switched to the 75A and haven't had the same problem. It is a good bit harsher though and I wouldn't want it in a street driven car.
I'm on the fence between the 60A and 75A; my only complaint about my exhaust is the vibration it adds (although, I think that's a function of the exhaust ever so slightly touching the exhaust tunnel).
No I don't; but I don't know anyone who actually uses one either, so it's not something I've really considered. With OEM engine mounts, I'm not sure that it is super beneficial to have one point that is much more solidly mounted compared to the rest of the engine and trans. Please correct if I'm mistaken.
Anyway, it was just a thought









