STR Prep - ECU and Tuning Discusson
Part throttle gains? Does that even exist?
So you want more hp at 50% throttle right? You realize you could just go to 51% throttle?
Like someone else stated, there isn't going to be some magical jump in hp from 95% throttle to 100% throttle, just because you got your car tuned.
So you want more hp at 50% throttle right? You realize you could just go to 51% throttle?
Like someone else stated, there isn't going to be some magical jump in hp from 95% throttle to 100% throttle, just because you got your car tuned.
I'll have to admit that I have tuning envy that the AP2v2's have. To the point of sending a letter (months ago) suggesting the all or none approach that Josh is talking about. I just went about it a different way, however I'm not the type of person to be squeaky enough to require the oil.
Originally Posted by TMartin
I may be in the the minority with this, but, I would go as far as saying Autocross isn't about winning, it's about driving.
-Dave
I would prefer that it was a rule that said something like:
- Car must have ability to run and provide stock OBD functionality w/ a stock ECU installed (does not need to be present during competition)
- No modification or addition of sensors
- Alternate ECU must plug into stock harness with no additional wiring that bypasses the stock harness (adapters between stock harness and ECU are allowed)
I can't remember if I wrote a letter or not, I have mostly been concerned with Street Prepared stuff this year.
That said, this was out for comment like 3 or 4 times, and to be fussy about it after the BOD finally approves is a bit late. At this point it's time to figure out what it possible given the allowances.
- Car must have ability to run and provide stock OBD functionality w/ a stock ECU installed (does not need to be present during competition)
- No modification or addition of sensors
- Alternate ECU must plug into stock harness with no additional wiring that bypasses the stock harness (adapters between stock harness and ECU are allowed)
I can't remember if I wrote a letter or not, I have mostly been concerned with Street Prepared stuff this year.
That said, this was out for comment like 3 or 4 times, and to be fussy about it after the BOD finally approves is a bit late. At this point it's time to figure out what it possible given the allowances.
I would prefer that it was a rule that said something like:
- Car must have ability to run and provide stock OBD functionality w/ a stock ECU installed (does not need to be present during competition)
- No modification or addition of sensors
- Alternate ECU must plug into stock harness with no additional wiring that bypasses the stock harness (adapters between stock harness and ECU are allowed)
I can't remember if I wrote a letter or not, I have mostly been concerned with Street Prepared stuff this year.
That said, this was out for comment like 3 or 4 times, and to be fussy about it after the BOD finally approves is a bit late. At this point it's time to figure out what it possible given the allowances.
- Car must have ability to run and provide stock OBD functionality w/ a stock ECU installed (does not need to be present during competition)
- No modification or addition of sensors
- Alternate ECU must plug into stock harness with no additional wiring that bypasses the stock harness (adapters between stock harness and ECU are allowed)
I can't remember if I wrote a letter or not, I have mostly been concerned with Street Prepared stuff this year.
That said, this was out for comment like 3 or 4 times, and to be fussy about it after the BOD finally approves is a bit late. At this point it's time to figure out what it possible given the allowances.
I would be happy with these rules
So if I'm reading the new fasttrack then correctly I now can't turn off the check engine light for a catalytic converter (P0420) code next year? That would be annoying...
For the record I am all for you guys with older AP2s and AP1s to be allowed tuning. Only fair that way!
For the record I am all for you guys with older AP2s and AP1s to be allowed tuning. Only fair that way!
I don't know either. I just know I want equal tuning ability to the drive by wire cars and the obd1 cars. I asked evans for a update and his reply was "no updates." If your interested in the Evans unit that he is/was working on please post and say so in this thread. It might modivate him to spend some more time trying to figure it out.
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/838...#entry21181632
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/838...#entry21181632
Keep in mind your car is lighter and you have a higher redline than the 06+ cars. All cars have pluses and minuses. And as nationals has shown, both the AP2 and AP1 are possible to win with....right now, without giving the AP1 more advantages. Just because my car can tune and yours can't, who cares, they're equally competitive in the end.
The current rules are basically "If your car can tune easily and/or cheaply without likely compromising emissions legality then you're allowed to tune. Otherwise you're not allowed to tune." Keep in mind at a national level allowances are not allowances, they're requirements. The reason is that under your rules an overdog could emerge that would require not being street legal because you need a standalone ECU. Don't you think "Street Touring" should be able to drive on the street?
The point of street touring is an accessible class that can drive on the street. Therefore the rule makes sense. If you really want to tune so bad, stop making this such a "I" argument and go buy an AP2.
The current rules are basically "If your car can tune easily and/or cheaply without likely compromising emissions legality then you're allowed to tune. Otherwise you're not allowed to tune." Keep in mind at a national level allowances are not allowances, they're requirements. The reason is that under your rules an overdog could emerge that would require not being street legal because you need a standalone ECU. Don't you think "Street Touring" should be able to drive on the street?
The point of street touring is an accessible class that can drive on the street. Therefore the rule makes sense. If you really want to tune so bad, stop making this such a "I" argument and go buy an AP2.
Josh you do not fully understand the downside of opening up ECU tuning to any and all options available. This current revision of the rule is perfectly fine. In a class with different cars, there is no way to create perfect parity that will enable all cars to be equal and still have a reasonable level of cost to compete.
If you allow ST cars to have any and all ECU tuning options you will just complain about someone running a full MOTEC setup that costs thousands of dollars.
Just use an Emanage or VAFC. They are not perfect but they get you most of the tuning gains you would get from other systems. There are just certain benefits to certain cars and if you want better ECU tuning, the only way to do it fairly for the class is to just buy an 06+ car.
I have E-Manage on my car and it has been perfectly acceptable to me. When Random1 beats me locally I know it is not that his car is that much faster then mine, he is just faster then me, and that is the way autocross should be.
If you allow ST cars to have any and all ECU tuning options you will just complain about someone running a full MOTEC setup that costs thousands of dollars.
Just use an Emanage or VAFC. They are not perfect but they get you most of the tuning gains you would get from other systems. There are just certain benefits to certain cars and if you want better ECU tuning, the only way to do it fairly for the class is to just buy an 06+ car.
I have E-Manage on my car and it has been perfectly acceptable to me. When Random1 beats me locally I know it is not that his car is that much faster then mine, he is just faster then me, and that is the way autocross should be.
Keep in mind your car is lighter and you have a higher redline than the 06+ cars. All cars have pluses and minuses. And as nationals has shown, both the AP2 and AP1 are possible to win with....right now, without giving the AP1 more advantages. Just because my car can tune and yours can't, who cares, they're equally competitive in the end.
The current rules are basically "If your car can tune easily and/or cheaply without likely compromising emissions legality then you're allowed to tune. Otherwise you're not allowed to tune." Keep in mind at a national level allowances are not allowances, they're requirements. The reason is that under your rules an overdog could emerge that would require not being street legal because you need a standalone ECU. Don't you think "Street Touring" should be able to drive on the street?
The point of street touring is an accessible class that can drive on the street. Therefore the rule makes sense. If you really want to tune so bad, stop making this such a "I" argument and go buy an AP2.
The current rules are basically "If your car can tune easily and/or cheaply without likely compromising emissions legality then you're allowed to tune. Otherwise you're not allowed to tune." Keep in mind at a national level allowances are not allowances, they're requirements. The reason is that under your rules an overdog could emerge that would require not being street legal because you need a standalone ECU. Don't you think "Street Touring" should be able to drive on the street?
The point of street touring is an accessible class that can drive on the street. Therefore the rule makes sense. If you really want to tune so bad, stop making this such a "I" argument and go buy an AP2.




