S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

STR Prep - ECU and Tuning Discusson

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 08:35 AM
  #31  
murderedrsx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Default

Im starting to see that too. I mean i just dont see the numbers to justify over a tuned afc. If you go to the na thread youll see vafc's getting cars to around 215-220 and tuned standalones in the 225 area. I love ecus and i love tuning and gadgets but man 10 hp aint worth it i dont think.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 08:48 AM
  #32  
b.r.i.a.n.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 677
Likes: 5
From: south florida
Default

Originally Posted by murderedrsx
Im starting to see that too. I mean i just dont see the numbers to justify over a tuned afc. If you go to the na thread youll see vafc's getting cars to around 215-220 and tuned standalones in the 225 area. I love ecus and i love tuning and gadgets but man 10 hp aint worth it i dont think.
an ecu will give you complete control over everything. you have no control over ignition timing with an afc. ignition timing will increase since you're targeting another load column to lean out the current afr mixture.

it's not all about peak numbers. especially in a road race car.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 09:09 AM
  #33  
murderedrsx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Default

This is true. I have tuned on kpro plenty. Im just not sure given allowable mods how much greater tweaking ignition timing is actually gonna do. Prob not a hell of a lot. Just changing vtec engagement is prob the most beneficial gain of any of it. I just cant see gaining 5lbft of toque at 4300 being worth a thousand either. Granted if i have the money id do it in a heartbeat.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 10:38 AM
  #34  
IntegraR0064's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 6
From: Near Philadelphia
Default

Originally Posted by TTMartin
Originally Posted by Random1' timestamp='1319226261' post='21090752
If you could migrate the RSX ECU guts to the S2000 housing then it would be legal? I think so.
I think that is wishful reading. I would interpret '1. Reprogrammed ECU (via hardware and/or software) may be used in the standard housing' as being reprograming by replacing IC chips on the existing ECU board, not replacing the entire ECU board with a completely different one.
It can and has been interpreted as you can put whatever you want in the stock housing. Some STS miatas run megasquirts crammed into the stock housing.

As mentioned though, the RSX ECU will not work because it needs different sensors. If it weren't for that it'd be fine.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 11:10 AM
  #35  
H22A_CD5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 1
From: Asheville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by b.r.i.a.n.
it's not all about peak numbers. especially in a road race car.
Definitely! You gain knock control/monitoring, datalogging, rev limit control, the list goes on. While these things could be controlled by separate modules, a standalone offers it in one package (Assuming you use something that is a STR Legal option).
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 11:11 AM
  #36  
murderedrsx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Default

Anyone got a haltech or aem ems they could open up and post pics of? Probably not hard to put in a stock housing as long as the pcb is small enough.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 11:40 AM
  #37  
Orthonormal's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 1
From: Azusa
Default

Originally Posted by H22A_CD5
I also realize that the ST u/b rules are much less clear than the SP ones.
That's probably because there are no rules to allow UD/BD in ST.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 11:43 AM
  #38  
Orthonormal's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 1
From: Azusa
Default

Originally Posted by TTMartin
I would interpret '1. Reprogrammed ECU (via hardware and/or software) may be used in the standard housing' as being reprograming by replacing IC chips on the existing ECU board, not replacing the entire ECU board with a completely different one.
I argued exactly that with a STAC member once, and according to him their intended meaning of "reprogram" could include replacing all the hardware with hardware that behaved differently. They may have added the "via hardware and/or software" language just for me.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 11:56 AM
  #39  
User 121020's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by murderedrsx
Anyone got a haltech or aem ems they could open up and post pics of? Probably not hard to put in a stock housing as long as the pcb is small enough.
If I'm not mistaken, neither of those ECUs support the OBD2 communications port, which is required to be operational in STR.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 12:42 PM
  #40  
marks_lude's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 1
From: Twin Cities
Default

Anyone with the "know how" willing to start a numbered list of STR legal tuning options now that rules have been updated? I'm still seeing a lot of "that wouldn't be legal because...", so a list would help lay out the good options.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 PM.