S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

TC Design Cage IN!

Thread Tools
 
Old May 22, 2006 | 06:49 AM
  #31  
TC Design's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: sf bay area
Default

A yes cage engineering! I think some of you home engineers need to go back to school. A tube is strongest in tension. It takes a considerable more amount of force to bend an x bar configuration than a NASCAR style set up. How does NASCAR get away with it??? Because they have five horizontal door bars and four vertical door bars. They get away with it in mass. If you look at current FIA GT, WRC, and Touring cars they all have an "x" style. FIA is currently investigating cage design given the amount of large WRC crashes in the past few years. They will be a lot of really good data coming out of that. You will also see a lot more crush boxes on the market in the next year or two. These mount in-between the door and the cage and slow the impact down, reducing the peak g-forces.

That's all for now folks! Glad to hear Dennis and Raymond are happy!

-Tony
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 07:19 AM
  #32  
BrianZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: East Bay
Default

Originally Posted by TC Design,May 22 2006, 07:49 AM
It takes a considerable more amount of force to bend an x bar configuration than a NASCAR style set up.
Can you please post data supposting this?

And how much force is requred before contact with the driver would have to happen?
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 07:51 AM
  #33  
TC Design's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: sf bay area
Default

Sure, there are a few hundred variables that need to be set first. I don't do internet debates, too busy, have fun guys.

-tony
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 08:00 AM
  #34  
BrianZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: East Bay
Default

Originally Posted by TC Design,May 22 2006, 08:51 AM
Sure, there are a few hundred variables that need to be set first. I don't do internet debates, too busy, have fun guys.

-tony
So you come into the forum, insult people here and make a blakent statment. Then when asked to back up your statement you leave. Why did you post in the first place?
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 08:07 AM
  #35  
Nobody's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area
Default

I think here's the data:

"If you look at current FIA GT, WRC, and Touring cars they all have an "x" style."

Even Tamiya has the right idea:
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 08:54 AM
  #36  
krazik's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

[QUOTE=IfixVWs,May 22 2006, 09:00 AM] So you come into the forum, insult people here and make a blakent statment.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 08:58 AM
  #37  
krazik's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,004
Likes: 7
From: Santa Cruz, CA, US
Default

Originally Posted by Nobody,May 20 2006, 11:04 PM
Aside from a plasma cutter, what's the best way to gut the doors?
I missed this b4. Sawzall works great too.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 09:19 AM
  #38  
dojo_s4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Stamford, CT
Default

Great looking cage, would you mind sharing what the costs were on the cage?

Looks great and thanks for sharing.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 09:25 AM
  #39  
Voodoo_S2K's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,792
Likes: 4
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Originally Posted by cthree,May 21 2006, 08:39 PM
I wouldn't trust anyone's advice (especially here) as to structural strength. We can talk all day long about little shit but structural engineering with life altering (or ending) consequences should be left to professional structural engineers. I wouldn't design and build my own parachute either. IMO of course.
Agreed. Unless any of us here is a structural engineer, we are just stating an option. Even the majority of cage builders out there are just fabricators, not engineers. IMO.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #40  
The Reverend's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: Studio City, CA
Default

Haven't been on the board in a long time, but I needed to PM someone, so I thought I'd check the board real quick and take a quick break from work...

I sat in an S2000 with x-braced sides a while back (can't remember which car) and remember the first thing I did was bang my elbow on the x while finding a good position to sit in. Without getting into whether an X or nascar bars are safer in a large touring car with lots of space next to the driver's seat, in the S2000 space is at such a premium that an x-brace side is way too close for my comfort. Even if you get just a little give in a collision, you'll have intrusion into the seat area. And even if there is no give at all, it would seem like you could shatter your arm/elbow on the bar in even a relatively minor collision.

Also, while it is true that the tubes are extremely strong in tensile strength, the same cannot really be said of the welds that tack the x to the rest of the cage. And if those welds hold, it's still possible to pull other parts of the cage inward from a collision at the x. I'm not trying to say a nascar bar is stronger, but I think the argument on this discussion has been far over-simplified. There are many pros and cons to each, which is why you can find plenty or race cars that use an x and plenty that use nascar bars.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.