AP1 vs. Sti on freeway
Originally Posted by S2000/RSXMan,Jul 10 2007, 02:22 PM
I just think the STi is in dominance over any S2000 until an S2000 gets forced induction or a very good naturally aspirated setup.
Originally Posted by S2000/RSXMan,Jul 10 2007, 05:22 PM
I just think the STi is in dominance over any S2000 until an S2000 gets forced induction or a very good naturally aspirated setup.
How much of the 1 mph do you think the 1.7 or 1.8 60ft had to do with it? It's erally not that hard to ponder. We've been over this 100 times. Obviously you guy's feel the way you do, and the s2000 drivers who have beaten sti's, N/A feel the way we do. It's not worth the debate. S2000's pretty much suck at drag racing to even begin with. What's that say about the STI then?
Originally Posted by blessed,Jul 10 2007, 03:55 PM
Why because it traps a whole 1 mph higher in stock form?!
How much of the 1 mph do you think the 1.7 or 1.8 60ft had to do with it? It's erally not that hard to ponder. We've been over this 100 times. Obviously you guy's feel the way you do, and the s2000 drivers who have beaten sti's, N/A feel the way we do. It's not worth the debate. S2000's pretty much suck at drag racing to even begin with. What's that say about the STI then?
How much of the 1 mph do you think the 1.7 or 1.8 60ft had to do with it? It's erally not that hard to ponder. We've been over this 100 times. Obviously you guy's feel the way you do, and the s2000 drivers who have beaten sti's, N/A feel the way we do. It's not worth the debate. S2000's pretty much suck at drag racing to even begin with. What's that say about the STI then?
if they trapped at like 104+ then i just sit back and take it, but a 101 car and a 100 car are a helluva race from a roll.
Originally Posted by versionJDM,Jul 10 2007, 03:00 PM
if they trapped at like 104+ then i just sit back and take it, but a 101 car and a 100 car are a helluva race from a roll.
does anybody else notice that these s2k haters are all guests here???
they go from forum to forum bagging on others cars because that they think theirs is far superior than everyone elses.
they go from forum to forum bagging on others cars because that they think theirs is far superior than everyone elses.
Originally Posted by Damnedhooligan,Jul 10 2007, 04:33 PM
the STI has trapped 102-103 mph in stock form with a good driver so i think its time for you to take it. Time and time again its has been proven....stock for stock, Sti will always win over an s2k with equally skilled drivers. Are you s2k owners stubborn like Rocky Balboa??? You're gonna keep getting knocked down in a stock for stock roll or dig race. I am not generalizing any s2k or STI owners. Give it a rest...one car was originally for rally and the other a roadster for the track....you cant keep beating a dead horse down 

13.296 100.660 8.458 82.050 1.885 =stock 04 STi
13.311 100.230 8.481 81.970= stock 04 STi
13.560* 100.550 8.697 79.910 1.912=stock 05 STi
and yes there are guys trapping 102-103 range, but its not the average at all.
i trapped 101(100.98) stock, and 105 modded. the STi is NOT THAT FAST in stock form. and yes we can beat this into the ground, and we have.
from a dig=STi, that about all your stock sti is going to do to most cars. catch it from a low speed roll, or a hwy roll and its retardedly low gearing turns into a dog over 100.
and yes, you will find s2ks trapping in the low 90's. you can throw that stats in each cars favor. point being that when averaged the STi ONLY runs low 13's due to its AWD. thats not to say you can mod it to out run the very hand of God, but in its stock form, yawn.
Originally Posted by butcher43366,Jul 10 2007, 04:39 PM
does anybody else notice that these s2k haters are all guests here???
they go from forum to forum bagging on others cars because that they think theirs is far superior than everyone elses.
they go from forum to forum bagging on others cars because that they think theirs is far superior than everyone elses.


