S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

AP1 vs. Sti on freeway

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:25 PM
  #31  
REVZ TO9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by versionJDM,Jul 10 2007, 12:24 PM
it will never end. so lets just leave it alone.
haha, ya Im done
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 02:22 PM
  #32  
S2000/RSXMan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Default

I just think the STi is in dominance over any S2000 until an S2000 gets forced induction or a very good naturally aspirated setup.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 02:49 PM
  #33  
REVZ TO9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by S2000/RSXMan,Jul 10 2007, 02:22 PM
I just think the STi is in dominance over any S2000 until an S2000 gets forced induction or a very good naturally aspirated setup.
totally agreeable
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #34  
blessed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by S2000/RSXMan,Jul 10 2007, 05:22 PM
I just think the STi is in dominance over any S2000 until an S2000 gets forced induction or a very good naturally aspirated setup.
Why because it traps a whole 1 mph higher in stock form?! How much of the 1 mph do you think the 1.7 or 1.8 60ft had to do with it? It's erally not that hard to ponder. We've been over this 100 times. Obviously you guy's feel the way you do, and the s2000 drivers who have beaten sti's, N/A feel the way we do. It's not worth the debate. S2000's pretty much suck at drag racing to even begin with. What's that say about the STI then?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 03:00 PM
  #35  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by blessed,Jul 10 2007, 03:55 PM
Why because it traps a whole 1 mph higher in stock form?! How much of the 1 mph do you think the 1.7 or 1.8 60ft had to do with it? It's erally not that hard to ponder. We've been over this 100 times. Obviously you guy's feel the way you do, and the s2000 drivers who have beaten sti's, N/A feel the way we do. It's not worth the debate. S2000's pretty much suck at drag racing to even begin with. What's that say about the STI then?


if they trapped at like 104+ then i just sit back and take it, but a 101 car and a 100 car are a helluva race from a roll.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #36  
Damnedhooligan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by versionJDM,Jul 10 2007, 03:00 PM


if they trapped at like 104+ then i just sit back and take it, but a 101 car and a 100 car are a helluva race from a roll.
the STI has trapped 102-103 mph in stock form with a good driver so i think its time for you to take it. Time and time again its has been proven....stock for stock, Sti will always win over an s2k with equally skilled drivers. Are you s2k owners stubborn like Rocky Balboa??? You're gonna keep getting knocked down in a stock for stock roll or dig race. I am not generalizing any s2k or STI owners. Give it a rest...one car was originally for rally and the other a roadster for the track....you cant keep beating a dead horse down
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #37  
butcher43366's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Temecula, CA
Default

does anybody else notice that these s2k haters are all guests here??? they go from forum to forum bagging on others cars because that they think theirs is far superior than everyone elses.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 03:40 PM
  #38  
REVZ TO9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

what does trapping mean?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #39  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by Damnedhooligan,Jul 10 2007, 04:33 PM
the STI has trapped 102-103 mph in stock form with a good driver so i think its time for you to take it. Time and time again its has been proven....stock for stock, Sti will always win over an s2k with equally skilled drivers. Are you s2k owners stubborn like Rocky Balboa??? You're gonna keep getting knocked down in a stock for stock roll or dig race. I am not generalizing any s2k or STI owners. Give it a rest...one car was originally for rally and the other a roadster for the track....you cant keep beating a dead horse down
13.184 100.860 8.350 81.770 1.744= stock 05 STi

13.296 100.660 8.458 82.050 1.885 =stock 04 STi

13.311 100.230 8.481 81.970= stock 04 STi

13.560* 100.550 8.697 79.910 1.912=stock 05 STi

and yes there are guys trapping 102-103 range, but its not the average at all.

i trapped 101(100.98) stock, and 105 modded. the STi is NOT THAT FAST in stock form. and yes we can beat this into the ground, and we have.

from a dig=STi, that about all your stock sti is going to do to most cars. catch it from a low speed roll, or a hwy roll and its retardedly low gearing turns into a dog over 100.

and yes, you will find s2ks trapping in the low 90's. you can throw that stats in each cars favor. point being that when averaged the STi ONLY runs low 13's due to its AWD. thats not to say you can mod it to out run the very hand of God, but in its stock form, yawn.




Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #40  
Johnny Sack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 1
From: formerly versionJDM
Default

Originally Posted by butcher43366,Jul 10 2007, 04:39 PM
does anybody else notice that these s2k haters are all guests here??? they go from forum to forum bagging on others cars because that they think theirs is far superior than everyone elses.
S2kguy it the only one of them that gets any respect from me, he actually know what the hell hes talking about......most of the time.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:19 AM.