AP2 vs LS1 fbody
#11
Sometimes I feel as if we are in full on deja vu mode, atleast one of these threads pops up every 4 - 6 months (S2K vs LS1 debate). It's a dead horse that's already been beaten more than its fair share.
#12
Originally Posted by 95rtturbo,Jan 29 2007, 01:16 PM
Not true. Auto LS1 F Body's run similar times to their 6 speed counterparts - mid to low 13's.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OHio
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was under the impression that the autos are faster in the quarter. This is according ot my buddy who has both the LS1 and LT1 auto WS6 trans ams. I dont know ?
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In theoretical land. I have seen them run 14's before, but that's not to say that is always the case. Could swing either way IMO.
I was under the impression that the autos are faster in the quarter.
#15
Originally Posted by Spartikus,Jan 29 2007, 03:46 PM
In theoretical land. I have seen them run 14's before, but that's not to say that is always the case. Could swing either way IMO.
#16
I've WATCHED them run 15's before, but that would be due to elevation and poor driving. S2k's run 15's here too.
I'm saying that you can say that THEORETICALLY any LS1 should run low 13's, but the fact is that's not always the case. We can all pretend that it's a rare occurence that someone doesn't know how to drive(and that we are perfect drivers), but we all know how that works out. I'm not saying that an S2k is faster, but rather that the margin of error is well within the believable range.
I'm saying that you can say that THEORETICALLY any LS1 should run low 13's, but the fact is that's not always the case. We can all pretend that it's a rare occurence that someone doesn't know how to drive(and that we are perfect drivers), but we all know how that works out. I'm not saying that an S2k is faster, but rather that the margin of error is well within the believable range.
#17
Originally Posted by Spartikus,Jan 29 2007, 05:16 PM
I've WATCHED them run 15's before, but that would be due to elevation and poor driving. S2k's run 15's here too.
I'm saying that you can say that THEORETICALLY any LS1 should run low 13's, but the fact is that's not always the case. We can all pretend that it's a rare occurence that someone doesn't know how to drive(and that we are perfect drivers), but we all know how that works out. I'm not saying that an S2k is faster, but rather that the margin of error is well within the believable range.
I'm saying that you can say that THEORETICALLY any LS1 should run low 13's, but the fact is that's not always the case. We can all pretend that it's a rare occurence that someone doesn't know how to drive(and that we are perfect drivers), but we all know how that works out. I'm not saying that an S2k is faster, but rather that the margin of error is well within the believable range.
#20
You beat a terrible driver. An LS1 Camaro is a good race with a SC'd S2K. An LS1 is much faster and quicker than stock or near stock S2K's. You cannot argue with facts, although I'm sure some will try.