NSX vs S2K???
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
From: 名古屋
i beat an older nsx ( page one) but he was all stock and and old man. I met up with him again not to long ago at a gas station.
comptech nsx's are supposed to be producing 400 or maybe 38- to the wheels with full exhaust. I dont' know what would win between the two I just know that they are both bad ass cars.
comptech nsx's are supposed to be producing 400 or maybe 38- to the wheels with full exhaust. I dont' know what would win between the two I just know that they are both bad ass cars.
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,971
Likes: 6
From: Dallas
Originally posted by squibb
Some people on this board are clueless. I have been hopping up Honda's and Acura's since 1989......back when DC sports was called DC fabrication and when AEM was just a parts dealer / tuning shop instead of a leading manufacturer. I have driven a 99 NSX and when compared to my S/C 04 S2k the NSX will edge it out. Why would Honda produce a faster 90K car than the cheaper 33K sports car...............DUH !!!!!!! I drove a ZO6 a month ago and then my freind's Comptech S/C 00 NSX..........no contest ..........the NSX would eat that ZO6 alive. If I raced the ZO6 it would hand my ASS back to me in my Comptech S/C S2K.
Some people on this board are clueless. I have been hopping up Honda's and Acura's since 1989......back when DC sports was called DC fabrication and when AEM was just a parts dealer / tuning shop instead of a leading manufacturer. I have driven a 99 NSX and when compared to my S/C 04 S2k the NSX will edge it out. Why would Honda produce a faster 90K car than the cheaper 33K sports car...............DUH !!!!!!! I drove a ZO6 a month ago and then my freind's Comptech S/C 00 NSX..........no contest ..........the NSX would eat that ZO6 alive. If I raced the ZO6 it would hand my ASS back to me in my Comptech S/C S2K.
He must be running more boost than normal because I though Comptech NSXs trapped around 115mph, what a bone stock Z06 traps at.
Doesnt it make about 360hp and 260tq to the wheels?
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
From: 名古屋
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 1
From: Glendale
They have two versions of the Comptech SC. A "regular" boost, and "hi-boost" version (8-9 psi). With full I/H/E + Hi-boost SC (and AFC) they are supposed to make about 460-475 hp at the crank.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 1
From: Glendale
They have two versions of the Comptech SC. A "regular" boost, and "hi-boost" version (8-9 psi). With full I/H/E, hi-flow cats + Hi-boost SC (and AFC) they are supposed to make about 460-475 hp at the crank.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 1
From: Glendale
They have two versions of the Comptech SC. A "regular" boost, and "hi-boost" version (8-9 psi). With full I/H/E, hi-flow cats + Hi-boost SC (and AFC) they are supposed to make about 460-475 hp at the crank.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Sandwich
its not a question of speed but it is a question of HANDLING. The NSX, being MR (mid-engine-rear wheel drive) owns on the race track. On top gear TV the NSX got the same track time as the Aston Martin Vanquish! thats awsome! If in the future, the S2000 was lengthened and given Rear engine, it would own EVERYTHING!!
