NSX vs S2K???
I don't care if the NSX is slower than a Z06 or other cars, I still love it. I've driven it quite a few times, and it drives incredibly, although I think the S is more nimble and crispier and its gear box is a little better too.
But anyway, the NSX may not be at the top in every category, but it's excellent in every category and overall. All I know is, I wouldn't mind having one. It is the only car I'd choose for under $100K.
But anyway, the NSX may not be at the top in every category, but it's excellent in every category and overall. All I know is, I wouldn't mind having one. It is the only car I'd choose for under $100K.
Originally Posted by VTEC Racer,Jul 30 2004, 01:35 AM
Manual 3.0 liter NSX's are good for consistent mid 13's, old or not.
I thought they only said that stock S2000 could be slightly faster than an "AUTO" 3.0 NSX... and your example is 3.0 manual? or, the AUTO is just as fast as 3.0 stick shift? that makes me wonder.. However, no matter how you people say about NSX.. NSX is definitely a good car in overall... I have sat in one... it handles very good ... its power is smooth and stronger than the S..... BTW, we people (the owner of both S and NSX) all agreed on S2000 is more of a fun car to drive. but it is just not enough to beat a NSX on the track
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TurboVtk
S2000 Street Encounters
49
Sep 15, 2001 01:16 PM




