S2000 Street Encounters Stories of on-the-road exploits and encounters.

well....here it is.

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:22 PM
  #11  
gt30r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

Originally Posted by turbo_jimbo,Feb 12 2006, 04:29 PM
and this is uncorrected! nice!

now with the same correction factor they gave me last week when humidity was at 19%, that gives you a peak hp of 235.45, and 17% drivetrain loss is 275.47 flywheel. nice!
What car are you talking about?
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #12  
gary_phd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by boyracerS2K,Feb 12 2006, 04:20 PM
i was there with dave while mike was straping down the car we where guestimating on what his car would put down i said it would put down 222 i was close. up here in our crappy air if you look at the humidity a whopping 10% i cant wait to see what he will make at sea level our cars pull so much harder in LA then they do here.
Actually, the 10% humidity is a good thing. Less water in the air, hence more oxygen. You don't want to be dynoing on a humid day. 0% would be optimum. The temp that day was pretty good also. If it were SAE corrected, it would have used a standard set of correction factors to normalize all power outputs to what they would be at sea level, on a 60 degree day, with 0 percent humidity. Aside for the altitude, good day to dyno. What's the altitude in Vegas?

Great numbers Dave. Too bad you didn't dyno when you were stock. At least now you have reference point. Did any other S's dyno that day? It'd be nice to get a comparison so we can have a point of comparison.

Ask if you could get a sae corrected print out. That way, it can be standardized for easier comparison for your later dynos, as well as other's dynos.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #13  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

Nice run.

There are plenty of S2000's of both generations that have pulled over 200 on Dynojets -- in fact there was a thread recently wherein a guy pulled 216 with an exhaust. The dynojets tend to read a bit high anyway given their type -- you are in essence just seeing how fast you can spin the barrel. No true load testing as you can with a Mustang dyno which on average reports ~10% less than a dynojet.

Regardless -- with 15 percent loss you are still not making your claimed 275hp ....
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #14  
mustangkiller01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 2
From: Hershey
Default

i dyno'd 215 with my ap1 stock.... so they do clear 200. i'll look for the sheets in my files and post them. good numbers but 220 and 153 isn't gonna beat some of the cars your claiming..... *cough*cts-v etc. cough*
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:41 PM
  #15  
turbo_jimbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Default

more humidity makes more power.

vegas is in a desert. very little humidity at all. even after it rains here the air still feels dry. we are at 2400 feet altitude too, so these numbers are right on with about 275 flywheel.

load can be made on the dynojet, its just left up to the operator to make sure they put the correct drag coeffient into the the computer. if everything is set up correctly, you can even estimate accurate 1/4 mile times on a dynojet.

to see an ap1 make over 200 to the wheels was either at sealevel with corrected numbers, or just incorrect corrected numbers. IMO.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:41 PM
  #16  
kayvan_pour's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara, California
Default

[QUOTE=mustangkiller01,Feb 12 2006, 05:33 PM] i dyno'd 215 with my ap1 stock.... so they do clear 200. i'll look for the sheets in my files and post them.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #17  
YellowS2kPwr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,906
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

Something looks wrong with this dyno.

Here is my Dynojet Dyno of a stock 2002 S2000 @ 91 degrees





Max torque 395??
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:45 PM
  #18  
turbo_jimbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Default

humid air is more dense. cooler air is more dense. dense aire is more air per given amount of space than less dense air. more air means more power.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:46 PM
  #19  
kayvan_pour's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara, California
Default

Originally Posted by turbo_jimbo,Feb 12 2006, 05:45 PM
humid air is more dense. cooler air is more dense. dense aire is more air per given amount of space than less dense air. more air means more power.
no... are you kidding??? Humid weather is terrible for performance!!! Every one knows this, what are you taling about!?!?!?
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:47 PM
  #20  
turbo_jimbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Default

are you serious?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 PM.