S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

2.2L = 260hp

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 10:58 AM
  #11  
GChambers's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,137
Likes: 0
From: Indy, In.
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by webmaecker
[B]i was told by Wilde Sun Honda in Sarasota Fl. (on vacation) yesterday that the new 2.2 s2000 will have 260hp --- no changes to the look of the car tho.



FWIW, i also sat in an RX8, and without expecting much, was blown away.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 04:07 PM
  #12  
Road Rage's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 2
From: Midlothian
Default

Hi - I am new here, trying to decide whether to buy a 2003 or wait on the 2004. I own a 500 HP 2003 SVT Cobra right now.

My understanding is the following, not from the dealer, but from a source at Honda (I am an SAE member, and auto journalist part time):

1) The engine will be stroked to 2.2L
2) There will be more torque, lower in the rev band and peaking earlier as well
3) Red line will drop below 9000
4) Engine PCM will have revised spark and fuel maps
5) No mention of HP change
6) Car suspension will be made softer

HP is of course a high RPM thing, and relates more to top speed than acceleration, which is torque driven. I would expect that the 2.2 will accelerate faster, due to the torque increase and bandwidth. I would predict that peak HP would stay the same.

Look forward to participating and contributing:

My subject matter expertise is in:
physics, tribilogy (lubrication), and EE.

Plus general automotive, held an SCCA Class C license for many eyars.

Sounds like they are "softening" the car a bit - I would give a few pounds of twist to keep the great, razor like handling. They make be appealing to a widfer demographic, which from a sales perspective often means an older target, who likes "easy to drive" cars. Not sure this is a step in the right direction.

If it is a stroker, redline has to drop, since the piston starts to waddle a tad as it reaches its highest point.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 04:32 PM
  #13  
User 101724's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Default

i'm not saying this is set in stone... just that this is what i was told. gotta admit, it sounds appealing...

i have repeatedly seen the S get 0-60 times of around 5.3 sec. this is obviously with frying the clutch...

by moving the power down the rpm range, the new S may be quicker -- not to mention the added hp. even if the new car doesn't shave .4 sec in acceleration, it will certainly make it easier to achieve the low 5's without dropping in at high revs...
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2003 | 11:17 PM
  #14  
honda606's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 7
From: houston
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by VTEC_Junkie
[B]

sure.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 12:29 AM
  #15  
Hyper-X's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by honda606
[B]
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 03:13 AM
  #16  
User 101724's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Default

Did you say 4's???
why not? the evo hits 4.9sec with 271hp and 273tq at 3300 lbs... the new S may be 260hp and 170tq at 2800 lbs...

not to mention the 240 horse 9k rpm model is already at 5.3...
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 05:16 AM
  #17  
GChambers's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,137
Likes: 0
From: Indy, In.
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by webmaecker
[B]

why not? the evo hits 4.9sec with 271hp and 273tq at 3300 lbs...
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 05:17 AM
  #18  
GChambers's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,137
Likes: 0
From: Indy, In.
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Road Rage
[B]Hi - I am new here, trying to decide whether to buy a 2003 or wait on the 2004. I own a 500 HP 2003 SVT Cobra right now.

My understanding is the following, not from the dealer, but from a source at Honda (I am an SAE member, and auto journalist part time):

1) The engine will be stroked to 2.2L
2) There will be more torque, lower in the rev band and peaking earlier as well
3) Red line will drop below 9000
4) Engine PCM will have revised spark and fuel maps
5) No mention of HP change
6) Car suspension will be made softer

HP is of course a high RPM thing, and relates more to top speed than acceleration, which is torque driven. I would expect that the 2.2 will accelerate faster, due to the torque increase and bandwidth. I would predict that peak HP would stay the same.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 05:29 AM
  #19  
Barry in Wyoming's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,762
Likes: 1
From: Sheridan
Default

Originally posted by LondonRam
Exactly xviper...This is my local dealership and and everytime I speak to them about the 2004 specs, I get a different answer...Go figure!
My dealership is just the opposite. When they see me coming, they hope I have some new information for them, because they have heard nothing since the spring dealers' show and the '04 paint chip card.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2003 | 05:42 AM
  #20  
User 101724's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Default

Dealers will tell you there is a PORT-A-POTTY in the trunk if it'll peak your interest and get you back.
dont think thats the case in my scenario --- being that i live on the other side of the country --- plus, if i did live here, why wouldnt they try to make the 03 more appealing (since i dont own an S yet) to get the sale "today", instead of 5 months from now...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:53 PM.