92 vs 94 octane
Isn't it the other way around? high revving engine requiring higher octane than low revving V8?
, are not considered high reving. That was my only point regarding the Prelude and such. But combustion is the main key here and unless the octane is being used it can have negative effects. Also, why would you consider a V8 low reving?
The RPM that the engine turns has nothing to do with the octane required. Higher octane helps prevent detonation in high compression engines; they can be 4's, 6's or 8's. Since the Prelude runs (relatively) high compression it requires premium fuel so the ECU doesn't retard the timing because of detonation.
Originally posted by Indecision
Isn't it the other way around? high revving engine requiring higher octane than low revving V8?
Isn't it the other way around? high revving engine requiring higher octane than low revving V8?
All of this is to prevent pinging or pre-ignition, which will eventually destroy your engine. I've seen tops of pistons disappear from pre-ignition. This was before engine computers were in use. Now, if the ECU (computer) senses pre-ignition, it will change (retard) your ignition timing to compensate for the problem. When you retard the timing, you loose power. I understand that our car's ECU takes a while to learn about the higher octane and compensate for it. I don't know if you will tell any difference in 2 or 3 octane rating points or not?
I hope that this helps,
Bob
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnnydev
S2000 Under The Hood
10
May 24, 2002 01:34 PM



