dissapointed with the s2k -.-
You guys are way too defensive about s2ks
the guy is entitled to his opinion. If anything, maybe he just test drove a bad car. He even said he was willing to try out another s2k
Coming from an 06 si, the vtec crossover was much more noticeable.
You guys don't need to bash civics and RSXs because the new SIs handle quite well in stock form. Definitely enough to give an s2k a run for its money
The only part where an s2k outshines the new si is steering feel and lightness
With that said, I sold my si and got an s2k and never looked back. S2K >>> RSX-S and Civic Si
the guy is entitled to his opinion. If anything, maybe he just test drove a bad car. He even said he was willing to try out another s2k
Coming from an 06 si, the vtec crossover was much more noticeable.
You guys don't need to bash civics and RSXs because the new SIs handle quite well in stock form. Definitely enough to give an s2k a run for its money
The only part where an s2k outshines the new si is steering feel and lightness
With that said, I sold my si and got an s2k and never looked back. S2K >>> RSX-S and Civic Si
Originally Posted by SIchodelic,Oct 28 2010, 01:48 PM
With that said, I sold my si and got an s2k and never looked back. S2K >>> RSX-S and Civic Si
SI and RSX = a little over $20k each brand new
For $10k to $15k more, the S2k better be a better car
i had a 2007 acura tl type s, i think the "vtec kickin in yo" is better on the s2k. When you go to a road course in the s you will find it is a much better car, way more fun to drive. If you are going to three honk race don't bother.
Originally Posted by Matt15,Oct 28 2010, 08:18 AM
lol did you do ANY research at all? 2.0L 4 cyl. doesn't exactly spell monster in a straight line.




