S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Does an S2000 really spin/crash that easy?

Old Mar 17, 2016 | 03:06 AM
  #51  
neuronbob's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 14
From: Cleveland, OH
Default

Originally Posted by Fokker
LoL, so much bullshit in this thread.

I'd bet money that anyone who has spun the car in a straight line either broke the rears loose without expecting it or was riding or almost riding the bump stops and hit a significant bump.

This car is no more spin happy than any other rear wheel drive car with a neutral balance. Get a good alignment, get good rubber, and go spend time driving at multiple autocross events.

This. The only time I spun out was at Mid-Ohio, in heavy rain, when I way trying to be aggressive during an HPDE, learning the limits of the car. In routine driving, with good tires, I never, ever lost control of my supposedly tail-happy AP1 in nearly eight years of ownership.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 03:42 AM
  #52  
zdave87's Avatar
Member
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82,468
Likes: 1,193
Default

Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 05:53 AM
  #53  
AP1Driver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Fokker
It's not prone to "snap" oversteer. It's prone to drivers who cause lift-off oversteer and then blame the car for it. That is driver error which can be replicated in any RWD car. Earlier versions of the car had a bias towards oversteer, but there was nothing "snap" about it.
Exactly.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 10:03 AM
  #54  
riceball777's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 75
From: Los angeles
Default

Originally Posted by AP1Driver
Originally Posted by riceball777
I also own a bmw 335i which is rwd just like the s2000. And yes the s2000 does Handel much better but the s2000 is also much Easyier to spin out in.
Yeah, it's because your 335i doesn't have perfect weight distribution, centralized mass, a short wheelbase or optimized suspension. Not as apples to oranges, but the two shouldn't be compared dynamically..:
Bmw 3 series actually have a 50/50 weight distribution just like the s2000
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 10:12 AM
  #55  
SheDrivesIt's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,061
Likes: 324
From: Land of Cincinnati Chili
Default

Originally Posted by riceball777
Originally Posted by AP1Driver' timestamp='1458110257' post='23909920
Originally Posted by riceball777
I also own a bmw 335i which is rwd just like the s2000. And yes the s2000 does Handel much better but the s2000 is also much Easyier to spin out in.
Yeah, it's because your 335i doesn't have perfect weight distribution, centralized mass, a short wheelbase or optimized suspension. Not as apples to oranges, but the two shouldn't be compared dynamically..:
Bmw 3 series actually have a 50/50 weight distribution just like the s2000
While true, I think there's more to it than that. Think of how a figure skater speeds up their spin by centralizing their mass. The S2000 (while I still feel is pretty stable) tends to spin rather rapidly when it does spin because of the short wheelbase and centralized mass.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 11:38 AM
  #56  
CMK's Avatar
CMK
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 671
Likes: 37
From: Hampton, VA
Default

Thanks to this thread for reminding me I need to sign up for an HPDE if I can find one that doesn't have the broomstick rule.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 11:41 AM
  #57  
Fokker's Avatar
Community Organizer
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 53
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by SheDrivesIt
Originally Posted by riceball777' timestamp='1458237811' post='23911699
[quote name='AP1Driver' timestamp='1458110257' post='23909920']
Originally Posted by riceball777
I also own a bmw 335i which is rwd just like the s2000. And yes the s2000 does Handel much better but the s2000 is also much Easyier to spin out in.
Yeah, it's because your 335i doesn't have perfect weight distribution, centralized mass, a short wheelbase or optimized suspension. Not as apples to oranges, but the two shouldn't be compared dynamically..:
Bmw 3 series actually have a 50/50 weight distribution just like the s2000
While true, I think there's more to it than that. Think of how a figure skater speeds up their spin by centralizing their mass. The S2000 (while I still feel is pretty stable) tends to spin rather rapidly when it does spin because of the short wheelbase and centralized mass.
[/quote]

Exactly. The BMW has the front mass resting more forward; 50/50 distribution is achieved by putting more mass further back at the end of the car. While the distribution is neutral, the polar moment of inertia is much larger and therefore the car resists spinning/rotating more readily.

With an S2000 (as with cars like the MR2), the polar moment of inertia is much smaller due to centralized mass. They rotate easily which is what makes them fast through sharper turns and very fun to drive. This also leads to the "snap" misnomer which is used as a band-aid by the unaware driver or poor driver. When the cars do start rotate more than intended, it happens fast and if you are not on top of it with corrections, you will lose the car to the spin.

If I spin the car (and I have many times), I study the video or replay it in my mind to determine how I or an outside factor caused it. While the physics of the car design make it easier to spin in comparison to other RWD cars, it isn't something inherent to the design of the suspension which the "snap oversteer" name implies.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 01:47 PM
  #58  
jamesac83's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by robertcope
Originally Posted by AP1Driver' timestamp='1458179190' post='23910941
Driver error. It's not the car.
You're answering the wrong question. The question was whether the S2000 was more prone that other cars to snap oversteer. I believe the answer is yes. It is still "driver error" when it happens for the simple fact that everything that happens is the driver's fault.

robert
..and here I was thinking the question was the actual title of the thread...
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 05:54 PM
  #59  
MikeekiM's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 487
Likes: 6
Default

And that said, shouldn't the answer be "Yes".

It's not asking whether these spins and crashes are caused by poor engineering or inexperienced drivers...

It's just asking if it's easier to spin and crash S2000s than other cars...and I think we all agree that the answer is yes...regardless of the root cause...
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 07:18 PM
  #60  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by RedCelica
Originally Posted by zeroptzero' timestamp='1457983755' post='23908233
Part of the problem with Ap1's is that the rear toe changes significantly as the suspension unloads, and toe settings go toe-out, causing whacky rear end behavior - leading to snap oversteer. They addressed that issue on the Ap2 suspension on 2004+ models.
Hence why I run minimal toe. The s2000 is a grip machine with the right tires and alignment. If you drive it like an asshat though it will respond in kind. Garbage in - garbage out.
Its easily addressable on an ap1 buy simply lowering the car, as many do anyway, to 1.5-2" effectively shorting the stroke/toe curve on rebound, wile incorporating the additional adjustable toe correcting rods. This puts you on a normal more leaner suspension trajectory on full stroke with virtually no toe influence throughout.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 PM.