FD gears comparison
Originally Posted by __redruM,Sep 6 2007, 06:33 AM
BTW, just curious, how was wind drag modeled? 155 is pretty close to real life.
basically effective wheel torque is converted to force on the pavement (due to friction b/w the tires and the pavement), and all i did is subract drag force from "wheel force" during the acceleration. when drag overcomes wheel force, max velocity is reached.
Originally Posted by RED MX5,Sep 6 2007, 06:31 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that was an *indicated* 170, based on the speedometer reading rather than a RADAR gun or GPS, right?
EDIT: https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...post&p=11295890
Originally Posted by S2-3456789-K,Sep 6 2007, 06:36 PM
are you sure i wouldn't be ap1 biased? haha i do control all the parameters 

Originally Posted by __redruM,Sep 6 2007, 02:57 PM
I did think that the AP2 shift times would be quicker given the better syncros, but we can wait until the numbers are up before we start flaming you 

does anyone have a stock ap2 dyno? in fact, it would be nice to have a couple so i can average them.
also, the speedo does have a small percentage of error, and your actual vehicle speed relative to the ground is not easy to measure completely accurately. as RED MX5 pointed out, there are some losses associated with the tires, and i absolutely agree that these plots are not absolutely accurate. they're just models and simulations, but when i run them, i always run them for a comparison. this way you can see the "relative performance" for each of the setups.
Originally Posted by t.vo408,Sep 12 2007, 09:41 AM
**** Matlab!
and yeah, i was just doing it for fun aka bored at the research lab.


