S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Gas for Californians?

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 6, 2012 | 09:22 PM
  #1  
satten's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default Gas for Californians?

Hi everybody,

since California only sells 91 octane and you're supposed to use 93 octane, what do you guys do.

really only asking the Californians and also if i use 91 is it fine?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2012 | 09:24 PM
  #2  
Thateguhate's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 6
Default

93?

Never heard of this.. My car runs fine on 91. I could even run 87 if I wanted to do so for just commuting and not driving aggressively.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2012 | 09:28 PM
  #3  
satten's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

thanks dude and i love your avatar. lets hope we f@#k shit up this year.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2012 | 09:49 PM
  #4  
Thateguhate's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by satten
thanks dude and i love your avatar. lets hope we f@#k shit up this year.
haha I hope so. Can't wait for the season opener!
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2012 | 09:54 PM
  #5  
hkspowers's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

In the manual it says the minimum is 91 octane probably to cover nanny states like Cali. Most of the US has access to 93 at the pump, but we live in nanny state Cali where pretty much everything involving a car is illegal so they even lowered our octane down. Here is a snippet from the Evo forum.

"Technobabble: February 2001
The Octane Game: Californians just got screwed. Hard.
By Dave Coleman

By the time you read this, residents of Nevada and Arizona will have been screwed too. What, you don't live there? Just wait, you're next.

It's not like West Coasters haven't been screwed before. From roadside smog dynos to tickets for shiny mufflers, we're used to the man getting us down, but this time they're hitting us where we eat. This time they're taking our gas. We already have pretty crappy premium fuel in California. Just like most of the West Coast, we're stuck with 92 octane, while much of the Midwest and the East Coast got to play with 93 or better. Now, as of August 1, 2001, the best we can get is 91. Time to turn down the boost.

On the off chance you're only now trading in your Schwinn 10-speed on a twin-turbo Supra, I guess I should stop here and explain what octane is and how it affects your engine.

When fuel is injected into the cylinder, compressed and ignited, one of two things can happen. It either burns quickly and smoothly, shoving the piston down with a strong, even push, or it explodes all at once, releasing its energy in a sudden burst of heat and pressure. This explosion is called knocking or pinging, and it's something engineers like to call "really bad."

Knock is usually ill timed, occurring early in the combustion cycle when the crank and rod are still straight up or even worse, still trying to complete the compression stroke. As a result, all the energy released slams into the top of the piston without actually turning the crank. When this happens under stressful enough conditions--like, 20-psi of boost in a Miata--you start breaking things. Usually the ring lands; however, if your pistons are strong enough, you might get lucky and blow a head gasket.

Octane, for those of you still on the bike, is the rating of a fuel's ability to not do this. The higher the number, the less likely the fuel is to detonate. What this means to us, of course, is the higher the number, the more boost we can throw at that Miata. High-octane gas isn't just for tuners though. Plenty of stock cars depend on the stuff, including a Celica GT-S with its 11.5:1 compression, or a turbocharged WRX or Volkswagen 1.8T.

These cars rely on high-octane gas to keep from detonating. Feed them 91 octane and they won't start breaking things, because their knock sensors will see it coming and retard the timing, turn down the boost or otherwise reduce your chances of having any fun.

Whose fault is it this time, CARB? The EPA? The CHP? None of the above. This time we're being victimized partly by the oil companies, and partly--this is the one that hurts--by ourselves.

You see, when crude oil is refined into gasoline, the refinery doesn't have all that much control over what comes out. Crude oil is full of all kinds of stuff, and a refinery simply separates it, sorting all the iso-this and hepta-that in order of density. The really heavy stuff, like tar, is near the bottom, while the really light stuff, like butane, is near the top.

Somewhere in the upper ranges of the stack are the components of gasoline. There are between 10 and 15 different blend stocks, each with a different octane rating, which are mixed together to make gasoline.

The crude oil being used and little else determine the amount of each blend stock available for mixing. Generally, if you just dump all the blend stocks into a bucket, you end up with something around 88 or 89 octane. If you're selective and only mix the good stuff, you can make 92, 93 or even 95 octane. But once you take out the good stuff, you're left with crap--something like 85 octane. Then you have to leave enough good stuff in the bucket to bring this pee-water up to at least 87 octane. This limits the amount of 95-octane gas you can make. If you make 93-octane premium instead, you use up less of the high-octane stocks, allowing you to make a higher proportion of premium fuel.

In the Midwest, where an extensive customer base of good old boys in pickup trucks consume vast quantities of 87 octane, demand for premium fuel is low enough to make genuine high-octane premium.

In California, however, Lexus-driving executives suck down premium fuel like it's Evian, so 92 was the rule.

CARB isn't entirely innocent. Many of its standards for evaporative emissions and misdirected attempts at oxygenation have raised the manufacturing cost of high-octane gas, but it doesn't seem to be behind the sudden change to 91. Instead, according my super-secret oil industry mole, it all comes back to money. Unocal, you see, has a patent on the 173 easiest ways to make California-friendly 92-octane gas. As a result, every other oil company has to pay Unocal 5.75 cents for every gallon they make using one of these techniques. They haven't actually been paying it, but that's an issue for the lawyers to sort out.

Suddenly it's pretty obvious why our gas sucks, but why doesn't Unocal still sell us 92? Because it can't. In 1997, Unocal sold off all its 76 gas stations, and with them, its ability to decide what kind of gas to make. All Unocal can do now islook for oil, suck it out of the ground, and wish it had some way to make everybody else keep using its patents. You see, not only did Unocal screw us, they screwed themselves.

Ironically, the only gas stations in California with anything better than 91 octane are the ones Unocal used to own--the few 76 stations offering 100-octane race fuel. You can locate these elusive stations at www.76.com, but bring your wallet. The current going rate is $6.00 a gallon."
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2012 | 10:04 PM
  #6  
satten's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hkspowers
In the manual it says the minimum is 91 octane probably to cover nanny states like Cali. Most of the US has access to 93 at the pump, but we live in nanny state Cali where pretty much everything involving a car is illegal so they even lowered our octane down. Here is a snippet from the Evo forum.

"Technobabble: February 2001
The Octane Game: Californians just got screwed. Hard.
By Dave Coleman

By the time you read this, residents of Nevada and Arizona will have been screwed too. What, you don't live there? Just wait, you're next.

It's not like West Coasters haven't been screwed before. From roadside smog dynos to tickets for shiny mufflers, we're used to the man getting us down, but this time they're hitting us where we eat. This time they're taking our gas. We already have pretty crappy premium fuel in California. Just like most of the West Coast, we're stuck with 92 octane, while much of the Midwest and the East Coast got to play with 93 or better. Now, as of August 1, 2001, the best we can get is 91. Time to turn down the boost.

On the off chance you're only now trading in your Schwinn 10-speed on a twin-turbo Supra, I guess I should stop here and explain what octane is and how it affects your engine.

When fuel is injected into the cylinder, compressed and ignited, one of two things can happen. It either burns quickly and smoothly, shoving the piston down with a strong, even push, or it explodes all at once, releasing its energy in a sudden burst of heat and pressure. This explosion is called knocking or pinging, and it's something engineers like to call "really bad."

Knock is usually ill timed, occurring early in the combustion cycle when the crank and rod are still straight up or even worse, still trying to complete the compression stroke. As a result, all the energy released slams into the top of the piston without actually turning the crank. When this happens under stressful enough conditions--like, 20-psi of boost in a Miata--you start breaking things. Usually the ring lands; however, if your pistons are strong enough, you might get lucky and blow a head gasket.

Octane, for those of you still on the bike, is the rating of a fuel's ability to not do this. The higher the number, the less likely the fuel is to detonate. What this means to us, of course, is the higher the number, the more boost we can throw at that Miata. High-octane gas isn't just for tuners though. Plenty of stock cars depend on the stuff, including a Celica GT-S with its 11.5:1 compression, or a turbocharged WRX or Volkswagen 1.8T.

These cars rely on high-octane gas to keep from detonating. Feed them 91 octane and they won't start breaking things, because their knock sensors will see it coming and retard the timing, turn down the boost or otherwise reduce your chances of having any fun.

Whose fault is it this time, CARB? The EPA? The CHP? None of the above. This time we're being victimized partly by the oil companies, and partly--this is the one that hurts--by ourselves.

You see, when crude oil is refined into gasoline, the refinery doesn't have all that much control over what comes out. Crude oil is full of all kinds of stuff, and a refinery simply separates it, sorting all the iso-this and hepta-that in order of density. The really heavy stuff, like tar, is near the bottom, while the really light stuff, like butane, is near the top.

Somewhere in the upper ranges of the stack are the components of gasoline. There are between 10 and 15 different blend stocks, each with a different octane rating, which are mixed together to make gasoline.

The crude oil being used and little else determine the amount of each blend stock available for mixing. Generally, if you just dump all the blend stocks into a bucket, you end up with something around 88 or 89 octane. If you're selective and only mix the good stuff, you can make 92, 93 or even 95 octane. But once you take out the good stuff, you're left with crap--something like 85 octane. Then you have to leave enough good stuff in the bucket to bring this pee-water up to at least 87 octane. This limits the amount of 95-octane gas you can make. If you make 93-octane premium instead, you use up less of the high-octane stocks, allowing you to make a higher proportion of premium fuel.

In the Midwest, where an extensive customer base of good old boys in pickup trucks consume vast quantities of 87 octane, demand for premium fuel is low enough to make genuine high-octane premium.

In California, however, Lexus-driving executives suck down premium fuel like it's Evian, so 92 was the rule.

CARB isn't entirely innocent. Many of its standards for evaporative emissions and misdirected attempts at oxygenation have raised the manufacturing cost of high-octane gas, but it doesn't seem to be behind the sudden change to 91. Instead, according my super-secret oil industry mole, it all comes back to money. Unocal, you see, has a patent on the 173 easiest ways to make California-friendly 92-octane gas. As a result, every other oil company has to pay Unocal 5.75 cents for every gallon they make using one of these techniques. They haven't actually been paying it, but that's an issue for the lawyers to sort out.

Suddenly it's pretty obvious why our gas sucks, but why doesn't Unocal still sell us 92? Because it can't. In 1997, Unocal sold off all its 76 gas stations, and with them, its ability to decide what kind of gas to make. All Unocal can do now islook for oil, suck it out of the ground, and wish it had some way to make everybody else keep using its patents. You see, not only did Unocal screw us, they screwed themselves.

Ironically, the only gas stations in California with anything better than 91 octane are the ones Unocal used to own--the few 76 stations offering 100-octane race fuel. You can locate these elusive stations at www.76.com, but bring your wallet. The current going rate is $6.00 a gallon."

Thanks dude.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 04:31 AM
  #7  
JohnsS2000's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,956
Likes: 7
From: Tampa
Default

I have been running 90 for the last year or so, only because it is the only pure gas I can find without going to a 100 octane or higher race fuel. I have notice a big mileage difference and slight performance gain by eliminating the corn fuel(10% corn syrup mix) from my car. I went from 15.2 MPG to 20.6 MPG in all city driving.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Sep 7, 2012 | 07:15 AM
  #8  
Stuttterbuttter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JohnsS2000
I have been running 90 for the last year or so, only because it is the only pure gas I can find without going to a 100 octane or higher race fuel. I have notice a big mileage difference and slight performance gain by eliminating the corn fuel(10% corn syrup mix) from my car. I went from 15.2 MPG to 20.6 MPG in all city driving.
Iv been running the same in my car. A Sunoco in Clearwater off 49th st. Has 87,89,93 Ethanol Free gas its a lil more in price but the car seems to like it. I haven't checked the MPG for a while but seemed like it was around 20-22.

This link might help it has some of the Stations in the U.S with Ethanol free gas. My link Click your state near bottom of page for stations in your state.

It says around 5800 Stations in the U.S have Ethanol free.

You poor California Drives only have 5 in your whole state!
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 11:46 AM
  #9  
JohnsS2000's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,956
Likes: 7
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by Stuttterbuttter
Originally Posted by JohnsS2000' timestamp='1347021094' post='21994618
I have been running 90 for the last year or so, only because it is the only pure gas I can find without going to a 100 octane or higher race fuel. I have notice a big mileage difference and slight performance gain by eliminating the corn fuel(10% corn syrup mix) from my car. I went from 15.2 MPG to 20.6 MPG in all city driving.
Iv been running the same in my car. A Sunoco in Clearwater off 49th st. Has 87,89,93 Ethanol Free gas its a lil more in price but the car seems to like it. I haven't checked the MPG for a while but seemed like it was around 20-22.

This link might help it has some of the Stations in the U.S with Ethanol free gas. My link Click your state near bottom of page for stations in your state.

It says around 5800 Stations in the U.S have Ethanol free.

You poor California Drives only have 5 in your whole state!
i have been to that station before, too long a hike for me to make to fill up tho, 30 miles 1 way. I take all of my gas cans with me to fill up. My Honda lawn mower, Honda generator, Briggs n Straton generator and the Rotax motor on my plane(sold) all get non corn syrup fuel.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 11:59 AM
  #10  
Stuttterbuttter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JohnsS2000
Originally Posted by Stuttterbuttter' timestamp='1347030950' post='21994956
[quote name='JohnsS2000' timestamp='1347021094' post='21994618']
I have been running 90 for the last year or so, only because it is the only pure gas I can find without going to a 100 octane or higher race fuel. I have notice a big mileage difference and slight performance gain by eliminating the corn fuel(10% corn syrup mix) from my car. I went from 15.2 MPG to 20.6 MPG in all city driving.
Iv been running the same in my car. A Sunoco in Clearwater off 49th st. Has 87,89,93 Ethanol Free gas its a lil more in price but the car seems to like it. I haven't checked the MPG for a while but seemed like it was around 20-22.

This link might help it has some of the Stations in the U.S with Ethanol free gas. My link Click your state near bottom of page for stations in your state.

It says around 5800 Stations in the U.S have Ethanol free.

You poor California Drives only have 5 in your whole state!
i have been to that station before, too long a hike for me to make to fill up tho, 30 miles 1 way. I take all of my gas cans with me to fill up. My Honda lawn mower, Honda generator, Briggs n Straton generator and the Rotax motor on my plane(sold) all get non corn syrup fuel.
[/quote]

Yeah i understand 30 miles 1 way is a trip to be honest i don't know if you would even notice that much of a differences going from 90 to 93. Now going for 90 to race gas is a different story. But I would stop by that one when going to or coming home from Quaker Steak on Thursdays.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rios2k41
S2000 Under The Hood
2
Aug 9, 2011 05:37 PM
macdaddies911
S2000 Talk
50
Sep 29, 2008 02:41 PM
ZaX_S2k
S2000 Under The Hood
27
Jul 10, 2005 02:00 PM
Veneficus
Arizona S2000 Owners
10
Jul 19, 2004 07:35 AM
JL9000
S2000 Under The Hood
14
Jul 9, 2003 09:56 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42 PM.