If the S2000 was offered in a 2.2 and 2.0 at the same time...

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Oct 27, 2003 | 01:16 PM

#71

Hustn

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 862

Likes: 0

From: Conifer, CO

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ttb

Oct 27, 2003 | 01:21 PM

#72

nastinupe1

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 2,984

Likes: 0

From: Alpharetta, GA (ATL)

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ttb

Oct 27, 2003 | 02:02 PM

#73

AusS2000

Moderator

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 30,809

Likes: 15

From: Sydney

Quote:

Originally posted by ttb
nah, that's just the inherent design advantage of the rotary, no wasted cycles

Agreed, but it does have to be pointed out that the 13b displaces 2.6L (not 1.3) in 4 strokes whereas the F20C displaces 2L for the comparison to be fair. The fuel usage reflects this also.

Oct 27, 2003 | 02:10 PM

#74

Road Rage

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 3,660

Likes: 2

From: Midlothian

Quote:

Originally posted by Hustn
I choose the 04 even though I had a choice of four, brand-new, 03s for ~$3k less.

No decision speaks louder than when made with money.

Welcome to Nerdsville! I voted with my $$'s as well.