S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 = poor man's M Coupe.

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 1, 2001 | 11:41 PM
  #31  
Sime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: Ex-pat f/Melbourne, Au. Now in
Default

[QUOTE][B]
Munch i geuss youve neva visited any other car sites, cause this one is probaly has the least flaming on a site that ive seen.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2001 | 11:52 PM
  #32  
Sime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: Ex-pat f/Melbourne, Au. Now in
Default

[/QUOTE]

I think it looks like a hearse for pets! If I owned a pet cemetery, I'd own one for sure.
[/QUOTE]

SpaS2k - that's just TOO funny!!!!! Man, you make me laugh....I'm still cacking myself over that one!!

Now you've done it....my wife's going to think I'm crazy when I unconditionally launch into a fit of laughter whenever I think about your feelings on the M-Coupe!

Interesting looking automobile...but not for me!

BTW, that forum is a crock. Guess that not a lot of them have really driven the cars they claim to know so much about! What's with 20,000+ posts in a year - don't they have anything better to do? Even our famed Greg Stevens can't post that much in a year!

Makes me want to do this.....
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2001 | 12:14 AM
  #33  
UK Paul's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 7
From: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Default

Originally posted by pfb
That thread is just a wee bit confusing... But they do seem like confused people. To clarify:

The '00 and earlier M-Coupes and M-Roadsters had a 240 HP 3.1L engine and was priced around $40K.

the '01 M-Coupes and M-Roadsters (undelivered yet as far as I know) have the sweet new M3 315 HP 3.2L engine. ... and a price increase.

The older M-Coupe was pretty comparable to the S2000 on a technical track; likely faster on an open track. The new M-Coupe, I'm guessing, will our asses on the track. Still not very attractive in the coupe, and not very stiff in the roadster, however.

Z3M, M Coupe in UK and Europe has always had the 321 BHP engine since early 98, 0-60 in 4.9 / 5.1 respectively

0-100mph in 11.9 / 12.0.

Both around 1400 Kg, so on a real twisty the S2000 may keep ahead, but in any straight line you have little hope of keeping up.

New Z3M roadster, has 343 Bhp 269 lb/ft motor, you guys really are getting short-changed, maybe our Euro S2000's do have more power
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2001 | 12:24 AM
  #34  
nvmys2k's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento - Home of da Kings!
Default

Kids nowadays!!!
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2001 | 12:47 AM
  #35  
Insomniak's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Htown-land of smog n' potholes
Default

hah.. i responded to the punk w/ the eclipse saying 'skyline owns s2k'

's2k owns eclipse' usually reading a thread on OT.net.. when someones trying to make a point.. its like listening to a 5yr old scream.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2001 | 02:28 AM
  #36  
Rick Hesel's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,049
Likes: 1
From: Timonium
Default

Speedster, NoFe2O3,

There's no accounting for taste....

[Edited by Rick Hesel on 06-02-2001 at 03:31 AM]
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2001 | 02:56 AM
  #37  
kerr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: london
Default

it's weird how opinions differ re cars. i love my s2k, but i think the m coupe is a gorgeous looking car, yet most people here think it's ugly.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2001 | 03:18 AM
  #38  
Vaper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Default

Having driven the 240hp version of the M Coupe I can say that the car is of such a different character that there is about as much reason to compare the 2 as there is to compare the S2k and a Z28 Camaro. Hey they both have 2 doors and are meant to be driven fast. Yeah, that's it. The MCoupe and the S2k are so dissimilar that to suggest that the Honda was conceived in the shadow of the bimmer is moronic. Now the Metro Lsi 3 cylinder ragtop is another story. That car is every bit the equal of the Ferrari Modena, right? Especially with the dealer added pin stripe package.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2001 | 03:29 AM
  #39  
Lovetodrive2000's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 35,982
Likes: 211
From: 262 miles N of the Dragon
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by kerr
[B]it's weird how opinions differ re cars. i love my s2k, but i think the m coupe is a gorgeous looking car, yet most people here think it's ugly.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2001 | 06:52 AM
  #40  
pfb's Avatar
pfb
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 0
From: Boulder
Default

I think the looks of the M-coupe kind of grow on you. It certainly isn't one of the prettiest cars ever built, but if one wants tire-smoking torque with great handling, it would likely give the Z06 a run for it's money...

Between those two, which is the better looking car, inside and out?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:27 PM.