S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2000 - not the fastest really

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 09:03 PM
  #61  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

[QUOTE=Ruprecht,Mar 24 2008, 11:08 PM]

So, you figure you will pass no prob and are not even looking for the juice.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #62  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by 03AP1,Mar 24 2008, 10:54 PM
Dude are you serious?! The S runs 0 - 60 in less than 6 secs and runs the 1/4 around 14. Good drivers have run the 1/4 in 13.8 +/- 0.1 (unsure on exact time). Did you even research the car before you bought it? Those stats you posted don't even come close to keeping up w/an S!!
S2000s can put down 5.5 0-60 all day long with a decent driver. On a good day with a good driver, the numbers get better.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #63  
Ruprecht's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Saki GT,Mar 24 2008, 09:03 PM] Wait, if there's only 300 feet before the merge, wouldn't you already be behind the truck or minivan?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #64  
ZX11's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ruprecht,Mar 24 2008, 09:21 PM
Indeed.

In the example, I assume I am in the lane that will remain on the merge.

The truck in in the lane that vanishes.

Since I am already in the merge lane, and he is not, I am fine with him merging behind me as we leave the light. In fact that is my preference.

The key is you are neck and neck at green and all you have to do is keep him from getting clearance off your front bumper to duck in before 100 yards of string run out.

However, I do not want to become embarrassed when he engages, then I engage, then the S loses. I'd rather give the spot away feigning non-interest than humiliate the S and myself being zonked by a truck. Alternatively, I don't think a reasonable answer is that a person needs to be counting the light like a drag race against a truck to ensure the outcome. It's a truck. A sports car should be able to react to a truck slightly after the fact and kick arse.

I'd rather not play the hand unless it's a winner...and with the S, it might be a winner, and it might not. Perfectly appropriate up odds against another sports car. Terribly inappropriate against a 3 ton double cab pickup truck.

FYI - I love the S, it just never kept up with the times, and in my opinion would be perfect with factory, warrantied, hp improvements.
6 seconds 0-60 seems pretty fast for a truck or mini van. A sports car can decide after the fact to race a 225hp truck for 300ft but not a 385hp truck

Looks like you need a 4.5 sec 0-60 car to make that on ramp.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #65  
ace123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 3
Default

Honda S2000: 2.15L, 240 bhp. ~$30000 or $34000 CR
(note: roughly equivalent straight-line performance to current mustang GT)

Porsche Cayman: 2.7L, 245 bhp. $49,400+options
Porsche Cayman S: 3.4L, 295 bhp. $59,100+more options, $70k is common

And I believe the Z4 3.0si is 255bhp, the Z4M for ~$50k msrp (forget how much lower they go for) has 330bhp but both carry a bit more weight.

While the stock S2000 no longer outperforms the Boxster S/Cayman S / BMW Z4M cars, it's still a similar performance package to the Boxster/Cayman/Z4 3.0si and at a considerable discount. Honda's performance wasn't updated, but neither was the MSRP.

And for the tuners:
Honda S2000 w/Rotrex high-boost: 360whp/~400bhp. ~$40000 installed with clutch & cryo-treated differential....i like this solution the best, so i'll be saving for FI. Alternatively, a 400bhp C6 can be bought for about this much.

Anyways, the non-S Boxster/Cayman and non-M Z4 owners get the same deal with the V8 pickups and minivans. (Maybe that's why they don't race much!) But if it's a big deal to be able to smoke every "typical" car, you'll need to spend the extra money ($40k and up) and go for a Corvette, Cayman S, Z4M, or FI. But 12 second diesels aren't unheard of, and this 89 4 cylinder dodge caravan is my absolute favorite. So even then, you still can't blow by every truck or van. IMO it really shows that horsepower is cheap these days, although the cost for performance in the broader sense continues to climb.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #66  
ace123's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 3
Default

/\/\
And I forgot the summary: If honda had kept up with the market, the 306bhp S2000 would cost $50,000 and weigh 3050 lbs.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 10:53 PM
  #67  
imnida's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 879
Likes: 1
From: Rockford illinois/Las Vegas
Default

Buy a crotch rocket if you wanted to smoke everyone

Dont buy an S2000 because you thought it was fast.... in a straight line.
Thats quite an ignorant decision when looking to buy one, and disregarding what its DESIGNED purpose was for.

Look at it this way, you can always mod to your fit and still go top down
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 01:33 AM
  #68  
mister x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 6
From: Honolulu
Default

Maybe he doesn't have his stickers, bet the ITR had stickers.


Seriously, I'd have fun even with less HP so long everything else is the same, especially the trans. Running through the gears with the top down gives me a boner.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 01:42 AM
  #69  
lyx201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

s2ks are not that fast =[ my rsx was faster
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 03:57 AM
  #70  
Ks320's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 1
From: Hong Kong
Default

S2000 a quick car ... but never fast to me ...

But it keeps me happy though !
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:23 PM.