S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Are S2K owners hypocrits?

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 08:58 PM
  #11  
qbmurderer13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Obviously I wouldnt mind seeing that on the street because I KNOW that is its a track car. If I see a car that I KNOW is not going to be on the track with these kinds of kits and wings I would be disgusted. Could just be me though
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 09:00 PM
  #12  
hariku821's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Default

But how do you know when one is gona be on the track or not? When an s is kind of a track car expecialy the cr. But civics are another story.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #13  
qbmurderer13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

I understand what your saying. Although realistically speaking most S2000 owners do not track their cars. Alot of people do dont get me wrong. But everytime ive been to the track ive never seen any s2k with a kit like the ones ive seen. Which leads me to believe they buy it for aesthetics. Hopefully someone with one of these kits can chime into this thread so I can help grasp this concept. Im sure those 3-4 grand or whatever they costs can be better spentfor brakes, tires, and suspension that would 3 times as much as an aero kit will.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #14  
Kurt2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

I'm with qbmurderer13 on this one.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #15  
hariku821's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by qbmurderer13,Sep 1 2008, 09:10 PM
I understand what your saying. Although realistically speaking most S2000 owners do not track their cars. Alot of people do dont get me wrong. But every time ive been to the track ive never seen any s2k with a kit like the ones ive seen. Which leads me to believe they buy it for aesthetics. Hopefully someone with one of these kits can chime into this thread so I can help grasp this concept. Im sure those 3-4 grand or whatever they costs can be better spentfor brakes, tires, and suspension that would 3 times as much as an aero kit will.
Your right i belive more ppl do it for asthetics but an s is more of a track car than a civic so to me i guess it dosent seem so ricey. Dont get me wrong some ppl go to far but a functional spoiler or scoop isnt to bad most of the kits arent to bad but then their are some crazy ones out their.

Kind of like with that db-9 if i knew a guy that had one like that but didnt run it on the track i wouldn't think he just got a dumb riced out db-9 but rather cool he got a track model db-9.


When the cost of the kit is less than the car its less rice lol or when the kit dosent bounce every time you hit a dip in the road beacuse its so cheap. ( those last statements were a bit counter intuitive lol.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #16  
duanet85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
From: Sandwich, IL
Default

my definition of "rice" is the civics and preludes and accords that have 19 different colors othe car not including primer and the double wing on the back with stickers used so they dont have to paint one body panel and the windows are tinted in some color like red or bright blue and 3 different rims with a non-functional folgers can sticking out the back that sounds like my gas chain saw. we've all seen them and all had a good laugh too. to the op, i dont think those cars are rice bc they took the time and money to do it right, not just slap shit together and good to go. at least they have a so called scheme to the whole car.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #17  
S2MURSE's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Glendora, DiamondBar
Default

The cars that you posted have aerodynamic kits which are functional. Which means they actually do the job at the track aerodynamically speaking. It may look a bit hideous or overwhelming to some people but these parts are track proven. They are rather expensive as well, due to the fact that they are initially made in Japan. I undertsand that we hardly see these cars on the track because people usually buy these kits just for car shows and such. Regardless, it's their own choice. I do understand your opinion though
I'm not the type to flame on people regarding their preference on how they mod their cars because everyone has different taste when it comes on modding

That was my homies orange amuse s2000 you posted by the way. great build IMO

Sorry for the long reply
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #18  
Lude4Life's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by duanet85,Sep 1 2008, 09:31 PM
preludes


Lol, I agree with everyone here. The Civic was designed to be an economy car, not a track beast; I find all body kits on a 'vic to be ricey.

Maybe it's because they were made in much smaller numbers, but I see a lot less riced out ludes.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #19  
qbmurderer13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default

Originally Posted by S2MURSE,Sep 2 2008, 01:36 AM
The cars that you posted have aerodynamic kits which are functional. Which means they actually do the job at the track aerodynamically speaking. It may look a bit hideous or overwhelming to some people. I undertsand that we hardly see these cars on the track because people usually buy these kits just for car shows and such.
And thats what I dont understand...
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 09:47 PM
  #20  
hariku821's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Default

im kinda willing to bet that some of the ppl that put these kits on and dont track the car dont really have a clue about the aerodynamics of the kit. But still in my eyes its not rice just a track car.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:39 AM.