1st 2.5L Inlinepro Stroker Kit
we all know all motor is always more expensive than going FI.
i'm very pleased to see the numbers and i think that is a great number.
like everyone have said already...dont know how reliable it is.
i'm very pleased to see the numbers and i think that is a great number.
like everyone have said already...dont know how reliable it is.
Um, ignorant post to follow..........
I have always been told that the optimum shift point is where torque stop building or falls off, and near the maximum horsepower point, which according to the graphs you just posted is about somewhere in the 6500-6900 rpm range. If that assupmtion is not total garbage based on faulty understanding, where do you have VTEC set to kick in? At the stock 6000 you would not have much VTEC at all before a shift.?.?.
I have always been told that the optimum shift point is where torque stop building or falls off, and near the maximum horsepower point, which according to the graphs you just posted is about somewhere in the 6500-6900 rpm range. If that assupmtion is not total garbage based on faulty understanding, where do you have VTEC set to kick in? At the stock 6000 you would not have much VTEC at all before a shift.?.?.
Originally Posted by MisterTwo,Nov 22 2004, 11:51 PM
What gear were the dyno runs done in?
Originally Posted by gernby' date='Nov 22 2004, 11:31 PM
Although gearing does have some effect on the dyno numbers, it is very small. Dynos measure the actual torque to the wheels (~ 2100 ft-lbs peak in 1st gear, ~1400 ft-lbs peak in 2nd gear, etc.), then factor out the gearing to come up with an approximate 1:1 number.
You have to have RPM to compute torque at the flywheel from horsepower. (rpm is the time component)
Originally Posted by kitwetzler' date='Feb 18 2005, 12:25 PM
This is untrue of a Dynojet. A dynojet measures horsepower, it measures the amount of acceleration of a known weight that the car can produce. It is not measuring peak torque to the wheels, as torque is a force without a time component, it's relatively meaningless in and of itself in terms of acceleration.
You have to have RPM to compute torque at the flywheel from horsepower. (rpm is the time component)
You have to have RPM to compute torque at the flywheel from horsepower. (rpm is the time component)
Nope. How can it measure torque? Dynojet has a large mass and it keeps track of the rate of rotation. You change the rotational velocity X amount, that means you make X horsepower.
If what you say is true, try using a dynojet with no RPM pickup. You get a nice clean horsepower graph, with no torque. (that's because torque at the flywheel is computed from horsepower at the wheels.)
Torque at the wheels would be entirely gearing dependent and would require you to know gearing to bring back a meaningful figure, dynojets don't have a gearing input.
If what you say is true, try using a dynojet with no RPM pickup. You get a nice clean horsepower graph, with no torque. (that's because torque at the flywheel is computed from horsepower at the wheels.)
Torque at the wheels would be entirely gearing dependent and would require you to know gearing to bring back a meaningful figure, dynojets don't have a gearing input.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kitesurfer s2000
S2000 Forced Induction
2
Jan 25, 2011 01:08 PM
DreamingOfYou
S2000 Forced Induction
44
Aug 27, 2010 02:16 PM








any updates?
