AP2 vtec should be lower

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Feb 27, 2008 | 08:04 PM

#41

Urge

Sponsor

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 2,492

Likes: 68

From: TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by qsmarcei,Feb 27 2008, 05:02 PM

I dont care if im in "vtec" or not, i just want more power

VTEC = more power..

and yes, it NEEDS lower crossover..

__________________

Feb 27, 2008 | 08:11 PM

#42

EOE

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 5,589

Likes: 69

From: New England

VTEC = Turbo

Feb 27, 2008 | 08:38 PM

#43

GrandMasterKhan

Thread Starter

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 5,149

Likes: 17

From: Raleigh, NC

Vtec: All the lag...none of the turbo.

Feb 27, 2008 | 10:18 PM

#44

EOE

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 5,589

Likes: 69

From: New England

VTEC = Twin Turbo and SC Combined.

Feb 28, 2008 | 04:26 AM

#45

jcbarnard

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2007

Posts: 343

Likes: 0

[QUOTE=ekoms31,Feb 24 2007, 03:21 PM] vtec has 2 stages right?? low cam for torque and high cam for hp?

Feb 28, 2008 | 05:18 AM

#46

S2KVITO

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 3,176

Likes: 0

From: Scottsdale, AZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrandMasterKhan,Feb 6 2007, 09:37 PM

So if the AP2 does in fact make more power under the meat of the powerband. You would think that Honda would have lowered the Vtec point to take advantage of the improved hp.

Which would also give the AP2 a longer VTEC powerband.

I know it can be done with afcs etc. So if people have done it. as far as i can tell both the ap1 and the ap2 can lower the vtec point to about 5600. Why cant the AP2 lower it more and still make good power?

You have an 06 get the Hondata reflash!