"ECU was reset 15 miles prior to dyno testing"
Throws off evaluation. With the ECU reset, all bets are off. During the first day or so, the ECU is "relearning" and making adjustments....its not consistant. I'll try to find my dynosheet (I think I pitched it after my post). I ran the same machine, same day, and no change to ECU. Also, the velocity stack went second, after the engine had pulled 4 times with the PRM. Look at where the velocity stack is pulling air from...that hot engine bay. Overall, this was a good effort but falls short of proving PRM is a great intake or non restictive.
1) need to show Filter X vs PRM same car, same number of runs with time to cool the engine bay between and no fooling around with the ECU.
-Believe me, it wasn't easy to turn away from the PRM. If you look at the early post Russ and I argued tooth and nail for it. But, the dyno numbers didn't lie. I followed the method I just outlined. I dynoed with PRM, took it off, let the car cool down and re-dynoed.