Compression numbers

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jul 27, 2011 | 06:06 AM

#21

Moddiction

Former Sponsor

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 28,698

Likes: 38

From: Mooresville, NC

^Yeah stock engine will be perfectly fine for that!!

Jul 27, 2011 | 07:15 AM

#22

s2000maniac

Joined: Dec 2009

Posts: 4,032

Likes: 15

well if you plan on rebuilding just go with stronger internal parts, you cant go wrong with that even N/A. But if you are going with another engine then yea 300-500 HP is good for stock engine.

Jul 28, 2011 | 12:15 AM

#23

simples2k

Thread Starter

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 534

Likes: 0

Should I consider this option?
http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/06...ild/index.html

Sep 2, 2011 | 12:37 PM

#24

simples2k

Thread Starter

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 534

Likes: 0

verdict: bent valves

Sep 2, 2011 | 04:01 PM

#25

steven975

Registered User

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 5,094

Likes: 6

From: Vienna, VA

assuming the bottom end is still good, it could have been worse.

Sep 2, 2011 | 10:48 PM

#26

simples2k

Thread Starter

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 534

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by steven975

assuming the bottom end is still good, it could have been worse.

i completely agree

Reply Subscribe

Related Topics

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

Compression Loss #1 Cylinder, MY00

Patrick L

S2000 Under The Hood

Oct 18, 2017 07:51 AM

compression test and new engine

s2kbtos

S2000 Under The Hood

Nov 8, 2015 11:06 PM

Compression Test...Possible Solutions?

Afterglow

S2000 Under The Hood

May 20, 2012 11:50 AM

High compression results

BEASTMODE

S2000 Under The Hood

Oct 19, 2011 09:01 PM

Compression test results 160-160-160-110

EK9MAX

S2000 Forced Induction

Jul 6, 2009 11:17 PM

Reply Share

First
Prev
3 / 3
Next
Last