S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

The Killer Angels

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 1, 2006 | 04:16 PM
  #271  
Vitito's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,Sep 1 2006, 08:19 AM
Day 1, Chapter 2, Buford.

What were your thoughts on the image of Buford, standing in the cuppola, unable to see through the fog, yet visualizing in detail the rebel attack on his regiments by sound alone?

What did you think of the first battle scene of the book? Does Shaara make you see the battle in your minds eye?

We meet Reynolds for the first and last time. What did you think of Reynold's and Buford's meeting? How did it leave you feeling about the course of the battle and the war? How did you feel about it a moment later when Buford looks back and sees Reynold's horse without Reynolds?

BTW, if you saw the Movie Gettysburg, I thought the casting for Buford's role was perfect. I forget the actors name. I'll have to see if I can find it.
Awesome descriptions of Buford. You can feel his deep concern, he knows his troops are in trouble if the infantry doesn't arrive soon. It all depends on how fast Reynolds comes. He even repositions a squad to the North, so he has time to pull his troops back if enemy troops approach from that direction is well, so they don't get surrounded/trapped. He's thinking of everything, and employing all of his resources to best advantage.

Reynolds and Buford, all heck is about to break loose, and Reynolds first action is to say, "Good morning, John." Wonder if that is what happened, if so, . With Reynolds' arrival on the field, you can feel his confidence with the words he speaks.

Reynolds must have had some "life force," sad when he's killed.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2006 | 04:51 PM
  #272  
Vitito's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Sep 1 2006, 07:43 PM
Vito,

The more I think about this, the more it seems that Lee repeats "Its all in God's hands" a number of times. As I read that I couldn't help but think it was either his subconscience way of admitting that he could lose the battle or something to hide behind if he did.
Rob, could be, though I believe Lee/Jackson think they are instruments of God, doing God's will. Just as John Brown thought he was doing God's will.

Here's an interesting clip from GODS AND GENERALS:

Jackson (pressing the attack, at night, against a scared and retreating (running away) Union Army at Chancellorsville, minutes before he is shot):

He rode farther, listening, looked up into the black, wanted to ask God to please let them keep on...but he did not, thought, You have given us much today. .....He looked up (saw the moon, and moonlight), said another prayer, Thank You for our success......Yes, he thought, God is still showing us the way!

Lee is described as believing absolutely in God. Jackson surely did. Jackson had absolutely no fear in battle, none whatsoever, because of his faith in God and a hereafter.

What I find fascinating is that many of the Southern generals believe firmly that God is on their side, showing them the way. Surely they read about EXODUS, bondage, etc. How could they think that a God that did battle for the ancient Hebrews, to release them from bitter bondage, could be for the South and the institution of slavery?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2006 | 04:56 PM
  #273  
ralper's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 33,171
Likes: 1,639
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Vitito,Sep 1 2006, 07:51 PM
Rob, could be, though I believe Lee/Jackson think they are instruments of God, doing God's will. Just as John Brown thought he was doing God's will.



What I find fascinating is that many of the Southern generals believe firmly that God is on their side, showing them the way. Surely they read about EXODUS, bondage, etc. How could they think that a God that did battle for the ancient Hebrews, to release them from bitter bondage, could be for the South and the institution of slavery?
Two very interesting points. Worth thinking about.

It seems to me that everyone involved in a war thinks that God is on their side. Not just this war, all wars.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2006 | 05:05 PM
  #274  
ajlafleche's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 0
From: West Springfield MA
Default

[QUOTE=Vitito,Sep 1 2006, 08:51 PM] What I find fascinating is that many of the Southern generals believe firmly that God is on their side, showing them the way.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 08:05 AM
  #275  
Vitito's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ajlafleche,Sep 1 2006, 09:05 PM
They would be intimately familiar with the Bible, old and new testaments. But they also viewed "the negro" as something less than human. They were considered the sons of Ham, one of Noah's sons who laughed at him after the flood for having been drunk and naked who was subsequently cursed by Noah
Thanks for the links, interesting, never came across such information before. Hard for me to believe. But then again, in today's world, are we not considered infidels?

Rob has a good point, many opposing factions both think God is on their side.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 08:06 AM
  #276  
Vitito's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

What chapter are we on?
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 08:07 AM
  #277  
Vitito's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

What chapter are we on?
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #278  
ajlafleche's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 0
From: West Springfield MA
Default

Originally Posted by Vitito,Sep 2 2006, 12:05 PM
Rob has a good point, many opposing factions both think God is on their side.
It's more common than not. Today's Islamist terrorists are convinced they are doing God's will as are many of their western targets. The Crusades a thousand years ago had these same foes on the battlefields from Spain to Jerusalem. The Greman's in WWII had GOTT MIT UNS on their belt buckles. The Troubles in Ireland pitted Catholics and Protestants against each other. And on and on throughout history most wars have been either in the name of God or sold as having His blessing.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 04:30 PM
  #279  
Lainey's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 65,392
Likes: 4,681
From: Smalltown
Default

Originally Posted by ajlafleche,Sep 2 2006, 04:45 PM
And on and on throughout history most wars have been either in the name of God or sold as having His blessing.
sad but true.

I finished the book. I think I'm going to read it again before PA.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #280  
Legal Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Day 1, Chapter 3, Lee

He starts his ride to the front with concerns of retreat. What is Lee's role on this morning? By the end of the day? What do you think of how the battle is orchestrated and commanded on the Confederate side?

Hill is sick and Heth is in over his head. He has not listened to the reports of Union cavalry and has committed troops a little at a time until the entire division is involved in what he thought was going to be a "brush off" of a few militia with shotguns.

Yet the pieces fall together for the Confederacy as General Early and Rodes, acting without orders attack the Union flanks. Heth, who started what could have been a disaster, is eager to redeem himself. Lee has little to do but order Heth and Pender to rejoin the attack. Finally, the Union breaks. But to what end? Lee is immediately concerned that the Union is reforming on the high ground. He knows this cannot be allowed. He orders his generals to pursue if at all possible.

Why won't Lee's generals pursue?

Longstreet arrives on the scene after the battle is over. He is pleased but does not kid himself that the success is the result of planning and again recommends the defensive strategy. Read Lee's reaction carefully. Note Lee's thoughts about numerical strength on page 119.

Why does Lee want to take the fight to the Union? Moments ago he has expressed concern over the Union reforming in the hills. Now he doesn't want to hear Longstreet's advice to move away from those same hills. Isn't Longstreet simply echoing Lee's own observation??? Yet, it seems, when he his presented with his own concerns, Lee goes in another direction.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 PM.