Site Info Open forum for the discussion of the S2K International site and organization. If you like what we're doing, post it here. If you don't, post it here too. Get answers to site related questions.

Update on forthcoming changes to s2ki

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 06:40 PM
  #21  
B.C.'s Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 59,877
Likes: 12
From: Area 51
Default

I'm interested in the LIFE membership.

BC
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #22  
Kel's Avatar
Kel
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,831
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Default

Originally Posted by Back-cracker,Mar 15 2005, 07:40 PM
I'm interested in the LIFE membership.

BC
Whats that give?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 10:08 PM
  #23  
Muz's Avatar
Muz
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,081
Likes: 0
Default

Being a sponsor I naturally have an alternative POV about advertising. However, if I weren't a sponsor I don't think the advertising would bother me because I realise that you can't provide a community resource without paying for it somehow.

To give an example... in the last 10 days I have sponsored no less than four S2000 meets, given 20 or more members of this site a discount on goods and paid advertising fees to S2Ki.

For each of these outlays I expect something in return... some exposure.

We rely on our ad banner for the reasonably limited amount of exposure we get on the forum. If our exposure were to rapidly dwindle due to a 'no ad' policy or feature or excessive use of ad blocking software we would simply be forced to stop supporting S2Ki and offering discounts to it's members. Of course we don't want to do that but we wouldn't have much choice in the matter.

So I would just ask people when they talk about banishing ads from the board that the end result would be to make it very difficult for sponsors to continue supporting not just the the board and its members but also the meets so many of you enjoy throughout the year.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2005 | 02:19 AM
  #24  
energetic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 30,032
Likes: 2
From: Athens, Greece, Europe, Earth, Universe
Default

I totally agree with cthree.

With our contribution this community and its service grows more and more. I must say that its the most well organised site/forum I have seen on the net. The more we give the more we get back.

And regarding the question "is 20USD or 50USD worth to spend"? Its not spending, its an investment.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 04:41 AM
  #25  
thonda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Simple Concept:

Pay to Play
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 04:47 AM
  #26  
genghiskwong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
From: 70 and fluorescent
Default

The limitation of ad banners does present an interesting dilemma. What is the happy medium between blocking and continued sponsorship?


One good aspect..... the overwhelming majority of members who would benefit from the ad blocking also already are very familiar with the s2ki sponsors. The problem would be gaining info on new sponsors.

What about returning the sponsor page with links?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 06:49 AM
  #27  
thatguyjosh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

What is everyone's problem with the banners? It's not like they are 400x600 and taking up the whole screen. They are small banners at the top of the page.. not only that but through them you can find new places to purchase S2000 parts from. I'm not sure I understand why everyone wants to have an option of turning them off?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 08:18 AM
  #28  
B.C.'s Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 59,877
Likes: 12
From: Area 51
Default

Originally Posted by thatguyjosh,Mar 17 2005, 07:49 AM
What is everyone's problem with the banners? It's not like they are 400x600 and taking up the whole screen. They are small banners at the top of the page.. not only that but through them you can find new places to purchase S2000 parts from. I'm not sure I understand why everyone wants to have an option of turning them off?
You're a GOLD member, you don't see all of the nasty stuff. Try logging out and look again
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 08:29 AM
  #29  
sweetj's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 34,298
Likes: 2
From: Baltimore, MD
Default

^ Is this true?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2005 | 08:37 AM
  #30  
thatguyjosh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Back-cracker,Mar 17 2005, 11:18 AM
You're a GOLD member, you don't see all of the nasty stuff. Try logging out and look again
the only difference I see is the "Ads by Google" section at the top of the topic/forum.. is that the only difference?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:05 PM.