FIA Decision
Originally Posted by matrix,Oct 4 2007, 12:31 PM
FIA favor Ferrari??? I have no idea how you can even say that after all we have seen this year....
FIA is tipped off that Ferrari has a movable floor on its car at the Aussie GP by non other then NS. Charlie Whiting and the FIA get around to dealing with them after the race. No media Circus, no branding the team a cheaters (Honda gas tank fiasco anyone), no loss of points and no ridiculous fine. Ferrari magicaly dodges another bullet.
Plus having Mouthpiece Montezemolo shooting his mouth off about Hamilton winning his first world championship in a Ferrari doesn't add much to the their sympathy fund in my book.
Originally Posted by Cypher09,Oct 4 2007, 12:39 PM
Give me a break. Ferrari gets way more leeway then any other team in F1.
FIA is tipped off that Ferrari has a movable floor on its car at the Aussie GP by non other then NS. Charlie Whiting and the FIA get around to dealing with them after the race. No media Circus, no branding the team a cheaters (Honda gas tank fiasco anyone), no loss of points and no ridiculous fine. Ferrari magicaly dodges another bullet.
Plus having Mouthpiece Montezemolo shooting his mouth off about Hamilton winning his first world championship in a Ferrari doesn't add much to the their sympathy fund in my book.
FIA is tipped off that Ferrari has a movable floor on its car at the Aussie GP by non other then NS. Charlie Whiting and the FIA get around to dealing with them after the race. No media Circus, no branding the team a cheaters (Honda gas tank fiasco anyone), no loss of points and no ridiculous fine. Ferrari magicaly dodges another bullet.
Plus having Mouthpiece Montezemolo shooting his mouth off about Hamilton winning his first world championship in a Ferrari doesn't add much to the their sympathy fund in my book.
That tells me they either found nothing wrong with it or NS is lying.
Like I said, NS denies being a "whistleblower" even though McLaren named him as a "whistleblower".
So is NS a "whistleblower" or not?
Who is lying?
Originally Posted by S2000spoon,Oct 4 2007, 12:45 PM
Hmm...what about the tire situation this last race?
The one where the FIA accepted responsibility for the error???
The FIA accepted after the race that the email had been delayed in getting through to Ferrari and announced that, to avoid a repeat situation in the future, it would now issue both paper and electronic notices to teams.
Originally Posted by matrix,Oct 4 2007, 12:42 PM
Ok so the FIA knew about the floor and did nothing...
That tells me they either found nothing wrong with it or NS is lying.
Like I said, NS denies being a "whistleblower" even though McLaren named him as a "whistleblower".
So is NS a "whistleblower" or not?
Who is lying?
That tells me they either found nothing wrong with it or NS is lying.
Like I said, NS denies being a "whistleblower" even though McLaren named him as a "whistleblower".
So is NS a "whistleblower" or not?
Who is lying?
So somehow because FIA failed to act it's Ferrari's fault????
The FIA was "protecting" Ferrari???
Wow....
Odd because the way I remember it was AFTER McLaren filed a complaint, the rule was clarified and Ferrari had to change their floor. Along with McLaren, Renault and BMW. Why did those other teams also have to change their floor?
Guess the FIA was protecting more than 1 team using your reasoning....
BTW, you should read this entire thread - most of this was already discussed....
The FIA was "protecting" Ferrari???
Wow....
Odd because the way I remember it was AFTER McLaren filed a complaint, the rule was clarified and Ferrari had to change their floor. Along with McLaren, Renault and BMW. Why did those other teams also have to change their floor?
Guess the FIA was protecting more than 1 team using your reasoning....
BTW, you should read this entire thread - most of this was already discussed....
Originally Posted by matrix,Oct 4 2007, 12:53 PM
Oh you mean the one about the FIA emailing out the notification and that it was delayed to Ferrari?
The one where the FIA accepted responsibility for the error???
Oh ya that is a clear indication of the FIA's favouring of Ferrari....
The one where the FIA accepted responsibility for the error???
Oh ya that is a clear indication of the FIA's favouring of Ferrari....

You gotta be kidding..I will give them the benifit of
the doubt if one other team also did not receive the
email and ran intermediates. But all other 11 teams
knew, but Ferrari?
Originally Posted by matrix,Oct 4 2007, 01:08 PM
Do you know how email works? Have you never received a delayed email?
Why would the FIA accept responsibility if it was not delayed?
Oh ya...the FIA favour Ferrari.
Why would the FIA accept responsibility if it was not delayed?
Oh ya...the FIA favour Ferrari.

I'm not bashing Ferrari...nor favor Maclaren.
Just giving what I see that is not consistant.
Only teams I favor is Honda and Aguri.
I'm not faulting Ferrari they'd be dumb not to take advantage of the fact that they are the Golden team of the modern F1 circus. My beef is with the FIA and their picking and choosing of what to punish and who to give special circumstances to.


