FIA Decision
How do you expect Ferrari to know when the email showed up in a Ferrari inbox at 13:37? 90 minutes after the race started?
It's clearly the FIA's fault for not confirming that all teams got the message. Which is exactly why the FIA took responsibility and will be issuing paper notices in the future.
The fact that this FIA screw up pretty well destroyed KR's chance at the WDC is another clear example of the FIA favouring Ferrari....
It's clearly the FIA's fault for not confirming that all teams got the message. Which is exactly why the FIA took responsibility and will be issuing paper notices in the future.
The fact that this FIA screw up pretty well destroyed KR's chance at the WDC is another clear example of the FIA favouring Ferrari....
Originally Posted by matrix,Oct 4 2007, 01:27 PM
How do you expect Ferrari to know when the email showed up in a Ferrari inbox at 13:37? 90 minutes after the race started?
It's clearly the FIA's fault for not confirming that all teams got the message. Which is exactly why the FIA took responsibility and will be issuing paper notices in the future.
The fact that this FIA screw up pretty well destroyed KR's chance at the WDC is another clear example of the FIA favouring Ferrari....
It's clearly the FIA's fault for not confirming that all teams got the message. Which is exactly why the FIA took responsibility and will be issuing paper notices in the future.
The fact that this FIA screw up pretty well destroyed KR's chance at the WDC is another clear example of the FIA favouring Ferrari....
http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=31906
If thats not clear favoritisms I don't know what is.
Originally Posted by matrix,Oct 4 2007, 01:43 PM
Ah yes, 2005, the year of the tire rule change...that clearly favoured Ferrari. 


And I seriously hope your kidding about the tire ruling as a plot by the FIA against Ferrari. Pre season speculation was that the ruling would throw another championship to Ferrari because they were the only team that mattered to Bridgestone where Michelin had to make tires for all the other top teams.
So bridgestone dropped the ball and its a conspiracy against Ferrari?
Ah, wasn't sure which item you were talking about...
First time I have heard about this and I don't really believe that McLaren would not have said something about this if this was true???
BTW, Bridgestone did drop the ball, but the single tire rule was put in place to stop another 2004 from happening....again another clear case of the FIA favouring Ferrari.
First time I have heard about this and I don't really believe that McLaren would not have said something about this if this was true???
BTW, Bridgestone did drop the ball, but the single tire rule was put in place to stop another 2004 from happening....again another clear case of the FIA favouring Ferrari.
Originally Posted by matrix,Oct 4 2007, 02:09 PM
BTW, Bridgestone did drop the ball, but the single tire rule was put in place to stop another 2004 from happening....again another clear case of the FIA favouring Ferrari.
Originally Posted by matrix,Oct 4 2007, 02:30 PM
Driver safety??? Common, how is it "safer" to drive on the same set of tires in a race???
Not wild speculation...common sense.
Not wild speculation...common sense.
Then what do you think it was for then?
The reason I say this is because of the the string of rule changes to combat what I call the MS effect.
Another good example of that is the points rule changes. That was done to stop MS from winning the title mid season. I think this change was one of the worst decisions by the FIA as it takes the reward out of winning.
The reason I say this is because of the the string of rule changes to combat what I call the MS effect.
Another good example of that is the points rule changes. That was done to stop MS from winning the title mid season. I think this change was one of the worst decisions by the FIA as it takes the reward out of winning.
Originally Posted by matrix,Oct 4 2007, 02:47 PM
Then what do you think it was for then?
The reason I say this is because of the the string of rule changes to combat what I call the MS effect.
Another good example of that is the points rule changes. That was done to stop MS from winning the title mid season. I think this change was one of the worst decisions by the FIA as it takes the reward out of winning.
The reason I say this is because of the the string of rule changes to combat what I call the MS effect.
Another good example of that is the points rule changes. That was done to stop MS from winning the title mid season. I think this change was one of the worst decisions by the FIA as it takes the reward out of winning.
The real reason MS lost 05 is because he DNFed 6 Races.


