Future classics
I would always have said a Mk1 Escort would go up in value, it's a numbers game, lack of supply almost creates demand and given how many are wrecked going rallying, it was inevitable.
XJS Ragtops are beautiful things but mainly because they're ragotops, the ordinary tintop XJS is less special and less rare which means prices won't rise as far or as quickly.
An E or D type it definitely isn't
XJS Ragtops are beautiful things but mainly because they're ragotops, the ordinary tintop XJS is less special and less rare which means prices won't rise as far or as quickly.
An E or D type it definitely isn't
Originally Posted by unclefester,Sep 13 2010, 07:58 AM
I would always have said a Mk1 Escort would go up in value, it's a numbers game, lack of supply almost creates demand and given how many are wrecked going rallying, it was inevitable.
XJS Ragtops are beautiful things but mainly because they're ragotops, the ordinary tintop XJS is less special and less rare which means prices won't rise as far or as quickly.
An E or D type it definitely isn't
XJS Ragtops are beautiful things but mainly because they're ragotops, the ordinary tintop XJS is less special and less rare which means prices won't rise as far or as quickly.
An E or D type it definitely isn't

I remember them as distinctly average cars and would never have thought that they would now be asking/fetching five figure sums
Most car enthusiasts I know are similarly bemused by the rises - so you are in a select band that saw it coming
You'll find that the ragtop versions of most cars are more valuable than their fixed head counterparts - although they are usually inferior driving machines in the case of moderns that don't have a separate chassis
That often doesn't matter though, mainly because of how they will be used - which isn't being thrashed around a track, but posing and cruising
Which is why I maintain 13/14/15mpg will be a complete irrelvance to whoever eventually buys my big-engined cars
I don't think anyone suggests the XJS is the equivalent of a D type or an E-type - certainly not me
Gad IMHO, the only version of the XJS that will increase in value(and price) is the big engined 6.0L version. The smaller engined versions wont be as desirable.
Where i don't agree with you is the version - in this case the one appreciating more will be the coupe not the ragtop model. Thats my opinion.
We shall speak in 5-7 yrs time
Where i don't agree with you is the version - in this case the one appreciating more will be the coupe not the ragtop model. Thats my opinion.
We shall speak in 5-7 yrs time
Originally Posted by s2000malta,Sep 13 2010, 11:53 AM
Gad IMHO, the only version of the XJS that will increase in value(and price) is the big engined 6.0L version. The smaller engined versions wont be as desirable.
Where i don't agree with you is the version - in this case the one appreciating more will be the coupe not the ragtop model. Thats my opinion.
We shall speak in 5-7 yrs time
Where i don't agree with you is the version - in this case the one appreciating more will be the coupe not the ragtop model. Thats my opinion.
We shall speak in 5-7 yrs time

performance-wise, the 4.0 is not appreciably slower
the 3.6 is not much slower than the 4.0 but the reason I bought my 3.6's is that they are MANUALS
the 3.6 manual is a very nice car to drive and don't let anyone tell you it's slow - it also does mid twenties mpg and engines are easy to work on (unlike the V12) and plentiful
coups will do well but rag tops always do better
it's the pose factor
same with having the biggest engine
Originally Posted by gaddafi,Sep 13 2010, 07:46 AM
however, the issue of storage isn't really relevant
I already have the storage
in the same way that most of you have a garage with only bikes and a mower in it
you wouldn't say, if your 'XYZ GTi' had trebled in value in three years, that you should offset that profit against what you could have rented your garage for
would you?
I wouldn't

I already have the storage
in the same way that most of you have a garage with only bikes and a mower in it
you wouldn't say, if your 'XYZ GTi' had trebled in value in three years, that you should offset that profit against what you could have rented your garage for
would you?
I wouldn't

If you have the thing as an investment, then you may want to.
You are assuming your garage /storage space has no intrinsic value, which it clearly does.
Opportunity cost.
Originally Posted by Moggy,Sep 13 2010, 12:21 PM
Depends.
If you have the thing as an investment, then you may want to.
You are assuming your garage /storage space has no intrinsic value, which it clearly does.
Opportunity cost.
If you have the thing as an investment, then you may want to.
You are assuming your garage /storage space has no intrinsic value, which it clearly does.
Opportunity cost.

I know I'm older than a lot of you but a few people need to wake up to the idea that (subject to dramatic news) you only live once
and you can't take it with you
Originally Posted by Moggy,Sep 13 2010, 12:22 PM
Gad, you should be a mortgage adviser? 

truly
(well, I managed the team that wrote the exams for them)
Originally Posted by gaddafi,Sep 13 2010, 12:25 PM
who the feck would talk about the opportunity cost of their garage when they eventualy sell their XYZ GTi?
I know I'm older than a lot of you but a few people need to wake up to the idea that (subject to dramatic news) you only live once
and you can't take it with you

I know I'm older than a lot of you but a few people need to wake up to the idea that (subject to dramatic news) you only live once
and you can't take it with you

No, you can't take it with you but you might want to leave a little present for someone.


