Mid-Atlantic S2000 Owners Members from Maryland, DC and Virginia

The Official Mid-A A/V Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 08:07 PM
  #161  
CaptKirk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,645
Likes: 0
From: The HS that is NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Dec 21 2006, 05:21 PM
Anyone thinking about buying a home a/v receiver with HDMI connections should hold off until after CES in January. Additionally, there are some interoperability issues with some of the "future-proof" receivers and other devices currently, not to mention that LFE boost(+10dB) over HDMI is not happening.

Naveed, I do not currently have an answer for your question. As Jeremy stated, most subs are self-powered these days, and it might be cheaper to just buy a small powered sub versus just buying the amp to power a sub. What are the dimensions of the room you are trying to fill?
Good info to know. I was starting to look at some receivers but didnt know of this issue. Guess I'll wait up a few months... not like I need it right now... I don't even have an HD TV to use it with I guess it would be smarter to get the TV first.

And thanks..no worries. I think I might just look into that small powered sub option. The room I'm trying to fill is 13'3" (width) by 11'3" (length) by 7'9" (height). Its a pretty small room...
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 09:30 PM
  #162  
animeS2K's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 18
From: In the ether.
Default

hell yeah, for that I'd think a 10-12" powered sub would more than meet your needs. I've got a 12" Definitive sub and that has powered some large rooms with ease.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 05:12 AM
  #163  
CaptKirk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,645
Likes: 0
From: The HS that is NoVA
Default

Ok after finding the user's manual online I got the proper specs on the sub. I have NO idea where I (or that other website for that matter) got the 6 ohms for the sub.

According to the manual the subwoofer is rated at 1.3 ohms, lol. I'm guessing I should be able to use a pretty "weak" normal amp in that case. What do you guys think of this: http://www.audiosource.net/2005/amp200.html

I can just turn it WAY down for now and even use it for something else down the line if I decide to upgrade...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 05:38 AM
  #164  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

Stability is more of an issue for an amp when driving lower-ohm'ed speakers.

To add, the Denons, and I believe the Onkyos, have reportedly handled the LFE boosting correctly. I'm just waiting on the possible issues with being compatible with all devices over HDMI. Rumor also is that Tweeter will no longer be carrying Denon. Not sure exactly why.

Thread on AVSForum.com
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #165  
tpipta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FF2Skip,Dec 22 2006, 06:38 AM
Stability is more of an issue for an amp when driving lower-ohm'ed speakers.

To add, the Denons, and I believe the Onkyos, have reportedly handled the LFE boosting correctly. I'm just waiting on the possible issues with being compatible with all devices over HDMI. Rumor also is that Tweeter will no longer be carrying Denon. Not sure exactly why.

Thread on AVSForum.com
Denon is a great product and a lot of the newer receivers now have upgraded software which will allow the proper handsake necessary for HDMI to work. Also, if any of you guys need anything product wise or advise I have been in the industry now for seven years.

As for the sub and the amp issue, i did not see if anyone asked since it is a passive device why you would not just run it HFE. I have a great 2 channel system with a REL sub running HFE that is amazing, a lot of the more highend 2 channel amps do not have dedicated sub outputs, so you really not left with any choice but to run a neutrik cable.

merry christmas!

-tony
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 06:52 AM
  #166  
TepEvan's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 53,292
Likes: 789
From: Owings Mills, MD
Default

bump
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #167  
FF2Skip's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 48,203
Likes: 10
From: Lewisville, TX
Default

For Chris and Chris:

Wait to buy a plasma
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #168  
animeS2K's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,310
Likes: 18
From: In the ether.
Default

sounds like a plan, skip... thanks. I was at BB tonight checking out the options with the wife, pretty much decided on the Sharp 52 LCD, then read about the new series shipping this month and next... argh, what a painful decision. But I can wait... even if BB is offering 3 yr 0%
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 02:46 AM
  #169  
tacocat's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photoriffic
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 62,266
Likes: 2,167
From: Land O Lakes, FL
Default

Hello all--I got a 50" Phillips plasma this Christmas and couldnt be happier. Using HDMI from the DVR/HD box to run the TV. SD programs looked ok, until I saw my first HD program.

There is nothing better.

Even though my set tops out at 720p, it still is an amazing picture and quite sufficient for my needs and desires. We had access to an accommodation sale through Phillips, so I paid less than 2k for it.

Was concerned about burn in and lifespan. For burn in, being aware of it takes away 95% of the problem, plus newer sets are much less prone to this than older ones (better technology?) As for lifespan, the math works out to be about 20 years if I watch the TV for 6 hours daily. Slighty longer if I can limit my television consumption to a lower level than this :lol
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 02:47 AM
  #170  
tacocat's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photoriffic
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 62,266
Likes: 2,167
From: Land O Lakes, FL
Default

oops for got the closing : at the end

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:59 PM.