Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

why are indians/pakistanis considered asians?

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #21  
dat boi's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,216
Likes: 5
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Apr 4 2009, 12:07 PM
Sure, culture is often very localized. But who said anything about culture? We're talking "race" here. Specifically, why Chinese and Indians, people of two very different cultures and looks (and indeed from different tectonic plates even) are both considered "Asian" by the US government.

Europe the continent is on the Eurasia tectonic plate.
Asia the continent is on the Eurasia tectonic plate.
That does not mean "Europe is Asia."

If we're talking Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary:
"Note: The continents are now usually regarded as six in number: North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia. But other large bodies of land are also referred to as continents; as, the Antarctic continent; the continent of Greenland. Europe, Asia, and Africa are often grouped together as the Eastern Continent, and North and South America as the Western Continent."

In other words, depending on how you look at it, there are only THREE continents - the Americas, Australia, and Afro-Eurasia.
With race, yes we are very different from your "average" Asian. But that doesn't mean we aren't Asian. About the whole Europe/Asia deal, I guess it depends on what you define as a continent and what geographical feature is large enough to distinguish a separation. Geographically they are 1 continent since there is no major break between them. But culturally, they are very different. Hence why I say it's a region.

This is what I learned in GCU and I would much rather believe a college professor who studies Geography about this issue than people on here unless they are credible as well. I will say this, I was taught the same thing that Europe is a continent, but looking at geographical terms, it is connected to Asia. I understand how different it is from most of Asia as far as culture and race is concerned, but that's not enough to make it into a continent.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 02:33 PM
  #22  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

dat boi, while it is technically correct that, if you define a continent as a large contiguous landmass, Europe and Asia are one and the same - and Africa too. Your professor might prefer that definition, and therefore consider people from, for example, Italy, South Africa and Thailand to be from the same continent but different regions thereof. However, a quick search around the 'net clearly shows that while that definition is certainly used by some it isn't necessarily the "correct" one, nor the most popular.

Eurasia is certainly a legit concept, but it's not one the US government considers - there's "Asian" and "white." Go figure.

http://www.amazon.com/Myth-Continents-Crit...IN%3D0520207424
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 04:56 PM
  #23  
LubedKoala's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 0
From: Denton, TX
Exclamation

Originally Posted by magician,Apr 4 2009, 01:56 PM
We're annexing them.

Shhhhh.
hahaha


Scew geology and just stick with colors ppl. I'm brown, you're black, he's yellow, and those guys over there trippin on acid are red.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 04:59 PM
  #24  
dat boi's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,216
Likes: 5
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Apr 4 2009, 02:33 PM
dat boi, while it is technically correct that, if you define a continent as a large contiguous landmass, Europe and Asia are one and the same - and Africa too. Your professor might prefer that definition, and therefore consider people from, for example, Italy, South Africa and Thailand to be from the same continent but different regions thereof. However, a quick search around the 'net clearly shows that while that definition is certainly used by some it isn't necessarily the "correct" one, nor the most popular.

Eurasia is certainly a legit concept, but it's not one the US government considers - there's "Asian" and "white." Go figure.

http://www.amazon.com/Myth-Continents-Crit...IN%3D0520207424
The only thing with Africa is that there is not enough land connecting them where as with Europe, it is clearly continuous. Culture based, we are "worlds" apart from one another.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 05:06 PM
  #25  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

[QUOTE=Elistan,Apr 4 2009, 12:07 PM]In other words, depending on how you look at it, there are only THREE continents - the Americas, Australia, and Afro-Eurasia.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 08:03 PM
  #26  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Originally Posted by magician,Apr 4 2009, 08:06 PM
I believe that you forgot Antarctica.
Nah - *I* didn't, the source I was reading from did. And it was deliberate on their part. That's the way it's taught in Latin America, wikipedia says. Go figure, eh?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #27  
Elistan's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,323
Likes: 28
From: Longmont, CO
Default

Originally Posted by dat boi,Apr 4 2009, 07:59 PM
The only thing with Africa is that there is not enough land connecting them where as with Europe, it is clearly continuous. Culture based, we are "worlds" apart from one another.
I'm curious then - how much land is "enough" to consider two connected land masses to be the same continent?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 09:55 PM
  #28  
gosixers215's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,429
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by LubedKoala,Apr 4 2009, 09:59 AM
Lets take a trip back to high school, because clearly some of you never went.

Geology 101. "Continent" is a geological term!

There are 7 continents on the round, and not flat, planet we call "Earth"

Count them:



PS. I don't know why Australia and North America are the same color...
I remember back in the 6th grade some years ago they tried to sell us on the idea that Europe and Asia should now be called "Eurasia". I wasn't buying then and I'm not now.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 08:12 AM
  #29  
mingster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 10,134
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Default

so...russians are asians too, eh?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 10:09 AM
  #30  
dat boi's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,216
Likes: 5
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by Elistan,Apr 4 2009, 08:07 PM
I'm curious then - how much land is "enough" to consider two connected land masses to be the same continent?
Looking at the map, eastern side of Europe is connected with Asia. But Asia and Africa have a noticeable break in them as well as North America and South America.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:31 AM.