S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

bigger or smaller? turbo

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 09:27 AM
  #51  
d-bo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Default

It would be more so that you're running more boost and progressively making less power per psi because either the wheel can't move that much air and keep up, or youre creating back pressure in the exhaust housing because the motor is putting out too much air that the turbo can't move quick enough. Which I think would just lead to boost creep
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 10:00 AM
  #52  
ScorpionT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by lude92_si
So from that I only see a wheel difference. But I'm not sure on the a/r sizes. Like I said I'm new to turbos and just going by what bullseye told me.
The S256 specs listed on the site are slightly incorrect. The compressor exducer is 76mm.

Originally Posted by lude92_si
And both look to come in the t3 .70a/r so how would this hurt the efficiency scorpion? Just trying to understand all this.
The smaller housing is a choke point.

Originally Posted by d-bo
fp Blacks and FP reds and FP zeros shouldn't work either in theory. You're pairing a huge wheel with a tiny exhaust wheel and housing but ppl still trap 150mph with them. Picking up 40mph in the back half Lol.

Is there more efficient ways to do it ? Sure. But I don't really think it will hurt you as much as it would seem on paper.

Also.... They only make t3 in .70 sizes for BEP/bw. His manifold is t3. And his downpipe is standard vband so he's limited to BEP or garrett
The only thing garrett offers would be a gt35r which then you're stepping up to a 62mm wheel
Its true, but you lose a huge amount of efficiency. The other thing is you are talking about a turbo being used on an Evo. They work fine with the unusual pairing, but an F series works better with a larger turbine wheel.

The S200 housings are divided T4 but with a small bit of machine work they can fit on a T3 manifold. The downpipe would need to be modified.

Originally Posted by baZurk
I thought the s256 and s259 both use the compressor housing from the s300sx fmw which houses a 61.5mm wheel.
The S256 uses a 3" inlet, 2" outlet. A properly built S259 uses the same cover as the S300, which is 4" inlet and 3" outlet.

Will stuffing a 59mm compressor into your turbo work? It could. Will it be anywhere near ideal? Definitely not.

What happens is you end up with too much compressor for the turbine wheel. Pre-turbine pressures become high and the turbo works harder to make the power. You push the turbo out of the efficiency range. What can happen is slow spool for the power you are making, high turbine pressure, high EGTs, etc...
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 01:31 PM
  #53  
lude92_si's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Default

I'm open to advice for a Turbo that will fit my pfab elm T3 and I have a 3" vband down pipe. Really would like a faster spooling Turbo with good mid and can make 600whp. I know I want alot. Time for some more research.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KV_Turbo
S2000 Forced Induction
26
Mar 5, 2018 11:47 AM
gfresh86
S2000 Forced Induction
14
Jan 10, 2017 09:51 AM
DFWs2k
S2000 Forced Induction
34
Oct 22, 2011 10:50 AM
boostalmighty
S2000 Forced Induction
11
Mar 2, 2010 04:15 PM
S2peed
S2000 Talk
1
Nov 22, 2001 03:42 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 AM.