S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

The downs of a SC

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #1  
highwaystardoritos's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,199
Likes: 14
From: Melbourne, FL
Default The downs of a SC

From this thead https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=454055 the second posted said,

" Are you dead set on a supercharger or would you consider a turbo? The only superchargers available for the car right now are centrifugal setups - I'm sure you know the ups and downs of that type of blower on a low displacement engine."

Now I"m quite certain on getting a supercharger, as I had a turbo charge car before and I want something different. The most i'll go on the supercharger will be 7psi to get a good 350hp. Anyways, I wanted to know what the downs are in that type of blower on our engines. I mean I done my research on it and I couldn't really find anything wrong with it. That or I can't search right. Oh, I'll be going with the Comptech supercharger. Thanks guys
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 11:42 AM
  #2  
afwfjustin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,423
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

That was my post You're not going to get 350hp with only 7 psi. You're going to need around 10 pounds of boost, so you'll need larger injectors and some type of EMS is going to be needed to tune it. This is going to run you another 2 grand. 7psi will only net you 300 +/-10 hp.

When I said that there was a downside, I wasn't referring to anything harming your car. I was talking about the downside to a centrifugal blower in general. They are mainly for high displacement motors that make a lot of low end torque and power yet run out of steam up top in each gear (like a Mustang for example). The centrifugal blower makes power as RPMS climb and helps it make more power up top where it needs it. The centrifugal blower on our car is just like the motor is set up: not much torque or power in the low/midrange yet makes a lot once VTEC hits.

The poster in that thread has been riding bikes a long time, and I was just thinking that he may not be very happy with a supercharger setup possibly. This is because yes, it makes a high peak power, but it's not very usable for day to day driving like a turbo would be.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #3  
trivium's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Default

The only con is the fact that it can only create power in the higher RPM's as opposed to lower and mid-range which a turbo can be configured to deliver.

I also think that the Vortech and Comptech kits are somwhat less efficient in creating power compared to whats available for other cars but thats a different story.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 11:51 AM
  #4  
Enthralled's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by afwfjustin,Jan 19 2007, 12:42 PM
That was my post You're not going to get 350hp with only 7 psi. You're going to need around 10 pounds of boost, so you'll need larger injectors and some type of EMS is going to be needed to tune it. This is going to run you another 2 grand. 7psi will only net you 300 +/-10 hp.
he said 350hp not 350WHP.Yes, you will get around 350hp with 7psi.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #5  
calaceyfl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Default

Originally Posted by afwfjustin,Jan 19 2007, 12:42 PM
That was my post You're not going to get 350hp with only 7 psi. You're going to need around 10 pounds of boost, so you'll need larger injectors and some type of EMS is going to be needed to tune it. This is going to run you another 2 grand. 7psi will only net you 300 +/-10 hp.
I think he was talking about "@the crank"

7psi will do about 350 at the crank and about 300 rwhp.

If you were to simply bolt on a CTSC then the boost isnt there untill high rpms, but with an AEM EMS you can lower the RPM at witch VTEC engauges creating boost sooner, (and more fun!).
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #6  
afwfjustin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,423
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Who the hell talks about crank hp?

It's not measured when you dyno, and if someone asks you how much hp you have and you say 350, they'd think you were full of it. People talk about what's made at the wheels - it's kinda the standard
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #7  
highwaystardoritos's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,199
Likes: 14
From: Melbourne, FL
Default

cool thanks everyone...

Yeah, 7psi isn't that much of a gain, but a good solid 350hp (300whp give or take a few whp) would be a awesome start. But for now, i'll keep it stock with just TP and exhaust.

I'll wait for AEM's new piggy back system to come out before I go higher PSI so I won't have pay that AEM EMS price hehe...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3vilmonkey!
S2000 Forced Induction
6
Feb 18, 2007 07:32 AM
NFRTurboTerror
S2000 Forced Induction
33
Oct 22, 2006 06:50 PM
Nick32
S2000 Forced Induction
7
Mar 27, 2006 06:07 PM
bgbfflochp
S2000 Forced Induction
4
Jun 28, 2005 05:49 PM
afetsman
Utah S2000 Owners
42
Jan 12, 2004 08:49 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:33 AM.