S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Mase Engineering 6262B Build Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 10:59 AM
  #281  
Suzuka_Joe's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,061
Likes: 64
From: Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by wait4vtec,Sep 30 2010, 03:17 AM
What about if you have a jb turbo?
Precision recomends not using a jb turbo because the s2000 oil pressure is so high.

I dont know anything about what restrictor you need tho.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 11:06 AM
  #282  
TRBOKEV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
From: Phillips Ranch 909!
Default

I thought the JB turbos needed an .065 restrictor?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 11:43 AM
  #283  
wait4vtec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Suzuka_Joe,Sep 30 2010, 01:59 PM
Precision recomends not using a jb turbo because the s2000 oil pressure is so high.

I dont know anything about what restrictor you need tho.
I guess I should just contact precision and ask them about what restrictor for a jb turbo?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 12:59 PM
  #284  
dsddcd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,964
Likes: 7
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by TRBOKEV,Sep 30 2010, 02:06 PM
I thought the JB turbos needed an .065 restrictor?
Edit - The 0.065" is used for the JB
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 01:12 PM
  #285  
TRBOKEV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
From: Phillips Ranch 909!
Default

Originally Posted by dsddcd,Sep 30 2010, 12:59 PM
The 0.065" is used for the watercooled BB
Nope, .035 water cooled ball bearing and .065 journal.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 01:57 PM
  #286  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

Originally Posted by dsddcd,Sep 30 2010, 01:53 PM
Totally different story

Last I heard they were still using a 0.035" Restirctor
Buddy of mine with his S and a similar turbo oiling and drain setup to mine decided to put a .075" restrictor on his Precision 6262 JB and burned up the bearings and it only took one day for it to happen. He is using a -3 feed from the relocation block on the engine and a -10 drain at the front, top, drivers side of the pan.

I do not recommend using a restrictor with a -3 feed coming from the relocation block and if the drain is setup properly with any JB turbo's.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 02:31 PM
  #287  
TRBOKEV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
From: Phillips Ranch 909!
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin,Sep 30 2010, 01:57 PM
Buddy of mine with his S and a similar turbo oiling and drain setup to mine decided to put a .075" restrictor on his Precision 6262 JB and burned up the bearings and it only took one day for it to happen. He is using a -3 feed from the relocation block on the engine and a -10 drain at the front, top, drivers side of the pan.

I do not recommend using a restrictor with a -3 feed coming from the relocation block and if the drain is setup properly with any JB turbo's.
That send location may or may not have something to do with it. I wonder if the pressure is lower off the relocation block?

I have a .035 restrictor on my water cooled ball bearing unit with a -4AN feed, works great!

My previous turbo (journal) had no restrictor with -3AN feed and was smoking in vtec and right after you would let off the gas (Not a lot but definitely noticeable on the dyno).. I didn't think about trying a restrictor for it until I had bought a new ball bearing unit and installed it. I bet it would have been fine with a .065 restrictor.. It's still sitting in my garage with only around 5K miles on it.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 05:16 PM
  #288  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

^^Where was your turbo oil feed being taken from at this time? I'm thinking having the oil feed to the turbo from the relocation block has a little lower pressure and may be the best spot to take it from.

I have had my oil feed from the relocation block for 7 years on 3 different JB turbo's with a -3 line feed line and a -8 drain into the girdle and no restrictors EVER and not one problem EVER.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 07:04 PM
  #289  
Andrewap1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Topillogic,Sep 28 2010, 03:09 PM
Resonance at low rpm, check
Crazy false knock, check
Just had to order a restrictor, check

Resonance/vibration I can live with, it's in a very narrow band around 2500-3000. Kinda sucks for stop go traffic, though. I already have a brace made for the DP from my install, so it may be better or worse than others are feeling. Resonance is a funny thing. I picked up some 60A mounts. They'll probably make it worse but I'm going to swap them out and try it.

I've taken knock count off my Tunerview so it doesn't bug me. But it's too bad it's now not worth logging. Saw 100 counts on one dyno pull.

I wasn't seeing smoke until I lost the cat last week, guys at T1 said order an 0.030 and see where we're at after that. Reading this thread, sounds like that should do it.

Edit: Just realized that came off kinda negative, not the intent at all.
So how many people are getting this false knock pick up from their sensors?

I was one of the first people to get my Mase kit up and running and have had all these issues as well, but due to lack of other people having the kit, I thought my motor was the issue.

My car smokes on decel when coming to a stop, and also have a pretty constant oil smell. I'm sure some of you may remember this from when I was posting of my issue with smoking after the install. So glad that I didn't go through with rebuilding my motor yet.. saved money again, for now.
I've got to call Mase for this restrictor, and hope thta it is indeed the fix to my problem.. it drives me up the wall, and its been this way since January!!

False knock!! This shit costed me an extra $300 freaking dollars!!
On the dyno the tuner was picking up knocking randomly. My knock sensor is the original one, and has never been broken.
The reason it costed me money was that I trailored the car up to the dyno (an hour and a half away) and otw there I stopped at a Shell station to fill the tank up.
Well the false knock reading kept popping up.. I didn't want to go home in disappointment and because we were unsure if it were bad gas, or a faulty/false knock sensor, I had them drain my tank.. yup.. a full tank.. and put some q16 in..
All in all I paid for new plugs, labor to drain the tank.. and for the q16 fuel.
Yup.. we were still picking up knocks..
Called it a day, and came back the next week to finish it off properly..

I wish I knew of other people having these issues too, sooner, so I wouldn't have gone through the trouble and extra money.
/rant
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2010 | 08:11 PM
  #290  
TRBOKEV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
From: Phillips Ranch 909!
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin,Sep 30 2010, 05:16 PM
^^Where was your turbo oil feed being taken from at this time? I'm thinking having the oil feed to the turbo from the relocation block has a little lower pressure and may be the best spot to take it from.

I have had my oil feed from the relocation block for 7 years on 3 different JB turbo's with a -3 line feed line and a -8 drain into the girdle and no restrictors EVER and not one problem EVER.
I had and still have my oil feed from the stock oil pressure sensor location off the block. I have put the stock dummy sensor on the relocation block and run an AEM sensor on the feed "T".

If you run your feed this way then IMO run:

journal bearing: .065 restrictor
Water cooled ball bearing: .035 restrictor
Ceramic ball bearing???

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:36 PM.