Supercharger or Turbo?
Originally Posted by S2krazy2' date='Dec 28 2008, 05:54 PM
Not enough to make a difference.
I just don't think the AP2's heavier flywheel is why the clutch slips. I think Honda either made it wimpier to save the drive train or the CDV just wears it out prematurely. I'd be curious to see how an AP2 clutch would do with the CDV removed day 1. no big deal, before too long I'll have my clutchmasters stage 3 installed and no more slippage
You can have a 500whp SC'ed s2k with 220 ft lbs of tq.
Or yo ucan have a 500whp TC'ed with 340 ft lbs of tq.
At that hp level it would be less expensive to go with the turbo as it takes alot to get a Supercharger there.
Or yo ucan have a 500whp TC'ed with 340 ft lbs of tq.
At that hp level it would be less expensive to go with the turbo as it takes alot to get a Supercharger there.
Originally Posted by ChefJ' date='Dec 28 2008, 07:33 PM
You can have a 500whp SC'ed s2k with 220 ft lbs of tq.
Or yo ucan have a 500whp TC'ed with 340 ft lbs of tq.
At that hp level it would be less expensive to go with the turbo as it takes alot to get a Supercharger there.
Or yo ucan have a 500whp TC'ed with 340 ft lbs of tq.
At that hp level it would be less expensive to go with the turbo as it takes alot to get a Supercharger there.
Originally Posted by candymanjl' date='Dec 28 2008, 08:54 PM
lol, the SOT gives more torque than that with 7psi but your point is taken with the CTSC 

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KV_Turbo
S2000 Forced Induction
26
Mar 5, 2018 11:47 AM
Ek_Jak
S2000 Forced Induction
6
Apr 21, 2010 01:27 PM







