S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Supercharger or Turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 01:54 PM
  #61  
S2Krazee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,315
Likes: 0
From: Mandeville, La
Default

Originally Posted by candymanjl' date='Dec 28 2008, 01:49 PM
AP1 has less torque too
Not enough to make a difference.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 03:03 PM
  #62  
candymanjl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Default

Originally Posted by S2krazy2' date='Dec 28 2008, 05:54 PM
Not enough to make a difference.
I'm sure you're right, it's only about a 5-10 torque difference across the powerband.

I just don't think the AP2's heavier flywheel is why the clutch slips. I think Honda either made it wimpier to save the drive train or the CDV just wears it out prematurely. I'd be curious to see how an AP2 clutch would do with the CDV removed day 1. no big deal, before too long I'll have my clutchmasters stage 3 installed and no more slippage
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #63  
ChefJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 3
From: Braselton, GA
Default

You can have a 500whp SC'ed s2k with 220 ft lbs of tq.
Or yo ucan have a 500whp TC'ed with 340 ft lbs of tq.

At that hp level it would be less expensive to go with the turbo as it takes alot to get a Supercharger there.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 07:54 PM
  #64  
candymanjl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Default

Originally Posted by ChefJ' date='Dec 28 2008, 07:33 PM
You can have a 500whp SC'ed s2k with 220 ft lbs of tq.
Or yo ucan have a 500whp TC'ed with 340 ft lbs of tq.

At that hp level it would be less expensive to go with the turbo as it takes alot to get a Supercharger there.
lol, the SOT gives more torque than that with 7psi but your point is taken with the CTSC
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 08:21 PM
  #65  
s.hasan546's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,171
Likes: 119
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by candymanjl' date='Dec 28 2008, 08:54 PM
lol, the SOT gives more torque than that with 7psi but your point is taken with the CTSC
yeah but the sot kit peak whp is gonna b hard to get to 400 whp let alone 500
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 08:53 AM
  #66  
candymanjl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Default

your right, the CTSC is all about that peak hp number.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KV_Turbo
S2000 Forced Induction
26
Mar 5, 2018 11:47 AM
gfresh86
S2000 Forced Induction
14
Jan 10, 2017 09:51 AM
ap1ap2whocares
S2000 Forced Induction
15
Oct 21, 2012 12:01 PM
Ek_Jak
S2000 Forced Induction
6
Apr 21, 2010 01:27 PM
nrgetik
S2000 Forced Induction
8
Sep 13, 2006 10:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 AM.