Twisties with FI
Originally Posted by bluemetals2k,Feb 21 2011, 08:34 PM
CAN ANYONE POST THE VIDEO I CAN'T FIND IT AND I KNOW IT WAS POSTED HERE ON THE FI FORUM
As multiple people have stated, its not necessarily one thing or another. With multiple factors in the mix, careful planning is your best friend. I went with an inlinePro F24 and inlinePro stage 2 boost kit (550hp/480tq) and still have no problem in corners. Once in a while, my neighbors exige has a hard time keeping up on the turns!
Originally Posted by bluemetals2k,Feb 21 2011, 08:34 PM
geez here we go again turbo vs sc...I just spent 40 minutes looking for that video awile back it was a 500whp s2000 sc vs a 500whp s2000 turbo
...from a 2nd gear or higher roll on the straights the turbo pulled away every time ( of course ) but from a 1st gear roll on the straights and up the sc pulled away because the s2000 had a linear power band which is GREAT for acceleration and traction...the turbo s2000 it was said in the video has to deal with boost spikes and traction issues do to the not so linear power band making it lose from a low gear roll
CAN ANYONE POST THE VIDEO I CAN'T FIND IT AND I KNOW IT WAS POSTED HERE ON THE FI FORUM
Now imagine having do deal with the turbo spooling up full boost mid turn...of course with the right set of tires that can be controlled...Im JUST SAYING the sc would be theoretically better for the twisties
...from a 2nd gear or higher roll on the straights the turbo pulled away every time ( of course ) but from a 1st gear roll on the straights and up the sc pulled away because the s2000 had a linear power band which is GREAT for acceleration and traction...the turbo s2000 it was said in the video has to deal with boost spikes and traction issues do to the not so linear power band making it lose from a low gear roll
CAN ANYONE POST THE VIDEO I CAN'T FIND IT AND I KNOW IT WAS POSTED HERE ON THE FI FORUM
Now imagine having do deal with the turbo spooling up full boost mid turn...of course with the right set of tires that can be controlled...Im JUST SAYING the sc would be theoretically better for the twisties
Originally Posted by GrandMasterKhan,Feb 21 2011, 08:42 PM
However we are talking about the twisties. Where you'll be on/off the throttle pretty much constantly, sometimes WOT is not possible given the upcoming road conditions/corners.
In that respect this is where a s/c would provide a superior driveability. Since you ALWAYS know exactly how the car will respond at any given rpm.
In that respect this is where a s/c would provide a superior driveability. Since you ALWAYS know exactly how the car will respond at any given rpm.
Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Feb 22 2011, 01:15 AM
Right, that's my point, since we are not talking about strait line performance for once, we are talking about the other part of the equation. If you want to build a "balanced" fast machine.
you may be basing your theories and experience only from your own setup, or turbo setups from other cars that have lag and minimal transient response. Probably because that's how most turbo kits are...how do i know? I have experience in both realms. But now here comes a kit that is showing and disproves that theory, yet nobody is seeing the obvious.
Were trying to say, yes, it IS possible to have the linearity with a correctly built and put together turbo kit.
again, i'm not disagreeing with what your saying, just trying to show the possibilities of the turbo in the twisties along with its predictability and how it doesnt spike with this kit
Please remember this is no way saying the turbo is better than sc..it's not where we are going with this. Just trying to show the OP that it is possible to have a well defined turbo kit that has almost no lag and have damn near perfect transient response and give that linearity in power through the twisties.
In summation (if everything said here is taken as truth) it seems that any kit I have listed here would work fine in the twisties, given that I would take it upon myself to be responsible and take the time to really learn the car on the track before taking it out and flogging on it in the mountains. It also seems that, since my goal is conservative, I could choose any kit and have near the same straight line performance. For example if I choose to go with a SC I should just shoot for near 450whp to match the performance of a 400whp turbo.
With these kits the downsides of the turbo (if their even is a downside) can be overcome by the drivers willingness to learn the car on a track..
I have always liked the idea of a car that actively wants to kill you forcing you to either be more responsible\competent or destroy the car\yourself. Cars like the Z06 and viper seem to com from the factory disliking the driver and trying to kill it. That has always been a big selling point for me. Just like the snap oversteer in the S2000.
I like a car that demands respect from the driver.
With these kits the downsides of the turbo (if their even is a downside) can be overcome by the drivers willingness to learn the car on a track..
I have always liked the idea of a car that actively wants to kill you forcing you to either be more responsible\competent or destroy the car\yourself. Cars like the Z06 and viper seem to com from the factory disliking the driver and trying to kill it. That has always been a big selling point for me. Just like the snap oversteer in the S2000.
I like a car that demands respect from the driver.
To put a finer point on what others are saying... Dyno charts show the power that a car makes when you floor it in 4th gear from low rpm. For example, by the time you're at 5k rpm you've already had it floored for some time in that gear, allowing a turbo to fully spool and build boost pressure.
Driving on the street rarely follows that approach. You're in and out of gears quickly, at different rpm, on and off the throttle. With a supercharger, as soon as you're in gear and on the gas you'll get the power you see at that rpm on the dyno chart.
In that kind of situation, a laggy turbo kit (e.g. something with a GT40) would not immediately deliver the power at a given rpm that you see on the dyno. There'd be a delay between when you hit the gas and when the power arrives, and you might experience a sudden spike (meaning going from "why aren't we moving?" to "OMG hang on!!"). Also, at part throttle, it may be a bit hard to predict exactly how much power you'll get, because it depends on how the turbo spools in reaction to you opening the throttle partway. So you'd want to practice giving it "some" gas to exit a corner to be sure you know how the car will react.
A non laggy kit, like Greddy or Ptuning, or Pfab with a GT3071R, would be less of a handful because you'd get power immediately instead of having to guess how much you'll get and when you'd get it. But they'd also put down a lot more power at lower rpm, so you'd have to be prepared for this (have the wheels pointed straight before you floor it).
Personally I think tons of power immediately at any rpm sounds like heaven. I took my Greddy kit off this past weekend and damn, do I ever miss it. How does anyone drive these cars without boost?? However, there are people who prefer the way a supercharger puts power down so linearly and consistently. You've just got to know which camp you're in before putting money down. There's not really a wrong answer, but we all have preferences.
Driving on the street rarely follows that approach. You're in and out of gears quickly, at different rpm, on and off the throttle. With a supercharger, as soon as you're in gear and on the gas you'll get the power you see at that rpm on the dyno chart.
In that kind of situation, a laggy turbo kit (e.g. something with a GT40) would not immediately deliver the power at a given rpm that you see on the dyno. There'd be a delay between when you hit the gas and when the power arrives, and you might experience a sudden spike (meaning going from "why aren't we moving?" to "OMG hang on!!"). Also, at part throttle, it may be a bit hard to predict exactly how much power you'll get, because it depends on how the turbo spools in reaction to you opening the throttle partway. So you'd want to practice giving it "some" gas to exit a corner to be sure you know how the car will react.
A non laggy kit, like Greddy or Ptuning, or Pfab with a GT3071R, would be less of a handful because you'd get power immediately instead of having to guess how much you'll get and when you'd get it. But they'd also put down a lot more power at lower rpm, so you'd have to be prepared for this (have the wheels pointed straight before you floor it).
Personally I think tons of power immediately at any rpm sounds like heaven. I took my Greddy kit off this past weekend and damn, do I ever miss it. How does anyone drive these cars without boost?? However, there are people who prefer the way a supercharger puts power down so linearly and consistently. You've just got to know which camp you're in before putting money down. There's not really a wrong answer, but we all have preferences.
I agree too that everybody has their own preference for boost, we're just stating that our turbo kit is also suited for the twisties. It has no issues with erratic or unruly power delivery and such. Here's a video of our local customer (Metros) who ran our turbo kit with the standard Gt30R at just 12 psi. This was at an HPDE day at Summit Point last fall.
This is a street driven car with street tires, it just happens to be on a track rather than the back roads. It just gives you an idea of how a properly done turbo system works around the twisties. BTW, sorry for the audio, but I believe his camera didn't have a wind filtering feature.
- Carlos
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmOuMX4WyN0 [/media]
This is a street driven car with street tires, it just happens to be on a track rather than the back roads. It just gives you an idea of how a properly done turbo system works around the twisties. BTW, sorry for the audio, but I believe his camera didn't have a wind filtering feature.
- Carlos
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmOuMX4WyN0 [/media]
Originally Posted by GrandMasterKhan,Feb 22 2011, 12:42 AM
all this comparison of dynos is awesome and all. But its all paper talk, it makes sense if your staying WOT the whole time.
However we are talking about the twisties. Where you'll be on/off the throttle pretty much constantly, sometimes WOT is not possible given the upcoming road conditions/corners.
In that respect this is where a s/c would provide a superior driveability. Since you ALWAYS know exactly how the car will respond at any given rpm.
The turbo however will constantly be spooling up/down, and there is no telling how fast the turbo will be spooling when you get back on the throttle or how quickly it will get back into boost. This is where having a smaller/more responsive turbo will come in handy, but there has to be a good balance otherwise you'll be roasting your tires @ low speeds and putting yourself sideways and down the mountain.
I personally am in the same delimma. I love the twisties, but I had a KW s/c and the power was awesome, however, it was not quite enough everywhere except on the mountain roads. I love the predictablity of the KW kit.
But now i want more, So i am going with the FullBlown twinscroll 6262, I understand there will be some lag, but i like the ablity to up/down the boost given conditions (ie mountain or flat land driving)
However we are talking about the twisties. Where you'll be on/off the throttle pretty much constantly, sometimes WOT is not possible given the upcoming road conditions/corners.
In that respect this is where a s/c would provide a superior driveability. Since you ALWAYS know exactly how the car will respond at any given rpm.
The turbo however will constantly be spooling up/down, and there is no telling how fast the turbo will be spooling when you get back on the throttle or how quickly it will get back into boost. This is where having a smaller/more responsive turbo will come in handy, but there has to be a good balance otherwise you'll be roasting your tires @ low speeds and putting yourself sideways and down the mountain.
I personally am in the same delimma. I love the twisties, but I had a KW s/c and the power was awesome, however, it was not quite enough everywhere except on the mountain roads. I love the predictablity of the KW kit.
But now i want more, So i am going with the FullBlown twinscroll 6262, I understand there will be some lag, but i like the ablity to up/down the boost given conditions (ie mountain or flat land driving)
It ultimately comes down to the driver. The car STOCK has a hard hit cross over at 6000rpm when VTEC engages, depending on which turbo you use you can even smoothen out this hit. Supercharger just exemplifies the whole power range, does this mean that having a supercharger + vtec means the person is going to have an uncontrollable amount of power at 6000rpm or wherever vtec is set to? NO because in the end it comes down to the driver.






