Daytime running lights
Originally posted by andrewewing
Are you trying to tell me your HID lo beams are not bright?
Please!
Andrew
Are you trying to tell me your HID lo beams are not bright?
Please!
Andrew
Hi Andrew
I think it's a beam pattern issue with DDLs. DDLs seem to have a beam pattern like aircraft landing lights. I think it is self evident that a car with its headlights on, in the daylight, is more noticeable than one without. The more noticeable, the better, especially if the viewer's attention is distracted.
Originally posted by wickerbill The reason that they're standard in Canada and the Scandinavian countries is because they have times in the year when the sun doesn't come up very high in the horizon and it's like dusk during the middle of the day.
), even if that is one of the more difficult situations for spotting a car (low sun in your eyes).Having your lights on simply improves detection in most conditions.
Drivers also tend to see a car with headlights on as being closer than one with lights off; this improves the margin that most people use when for instance driving into an intersection with crossing traffic or starting a passing maneuver with on-coming cars in the other lane.
Originally posted by andrewewing
There is NO proof they increase safety on cars (motorcycles are another issue).
Andrew
There is NO proof they increase safety on cars (motorcycles are another issue).
Andrew
It's like the seatbelt law - everybody hated the thought of having that regulated, but I think most people will probably now agree that only idiots would think of driving without using their seatbelts.
If you took a census of traffic on my way to work (7:40 am PST), 90% now drive the freeways with headlights on, even though it is broad daylight. And the same on my return from work at 4:30 pm. (Sunrise & Sunset = 7.01/5:13) People are beginning to realise that they want to be seen.
Anyone for a poll?
Yes, driving lights have been thoroughly evaluated, and the statistics prove that the number of accidents decrease significantly.
Some people say that using the lights during daytime is either wasteful, looks ugly or both. I think that really is beside the point if you know that you increase your chances of surviving your daily commute...
Some people say that using the lights during daytime is either wasteful, looks ugly or both. I think that really is beside the point if you know that you increase your chances of surviving your daily commute...
While most people have backed up the reason for DRL's It is true that they add to saftey. On a bright sunny day if you had 2 cars comming at you from 200' away, you would notice the one wit the lights on first. The tests back this up. Also in Canada, At least in Ontario, Its never dusk during the day. The sun always goes directly above our heads. While it is true that we may have less hours of daytime, The world is still round. This dosen't change.
To tell the truth when DRL's became mandatory I thought it was stupid, and didn't like it one bit. As time went by I appreciate every saftey advantage I can get.
P.S. No word yet on the wire harness. I will post soon!
To tell the truth when DRL's became mandatory I thought it was stupid, and didn't like it one bit. As time went by I appreciate every saftey advantage I can get.
P.S. No word yet on the wire harness. I will post soon!
In Texas, school busses are now required to have DRL's.
As for the legality in some states, most new GM cars have DRL's as default options. What are those folks to do? I don't think there are any laws against it.
As for the legality in some states, most new GM cars have DRL's as default options. What are those folks to do? I don't think there are any laws against it.
I think some of the laws are against foglights in the middle of the day. I remember in the town where I went to college (Oklahoma State Univ. - Stillwater, OK) passed a law outlawing fog lights in the middle of the day. I think there were a lot of students at the school from Japan that had modified civics, accords, and preludes that drove around with those on. Maybe that's the type of law he's thinking of.
Mark
Mark
</div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE ( @ Jan 19 2001, 02:45 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> While most people have backed up the reason for DRL's It is true that they add to saftey. On a bright sunny day if you had 2 cars comming at you from 200' away, you would notice the one wit the lights on first. The tests back this up. Also in Canada, At least in Ontario, Its never dusk during the day. The sun always goes directly above our heads. While it is true that we may have less hours of daytime, The world is still round. This dosen't change.
To tell the truth when DRL's became mandatory I thought it was stupid, and didn't like it one bit. As time went by I appreciate every saftey advantage I can get.
P.S. No word yet on the wire harness. I will post soon! [/QUOTE]
From what I understand, theoretically we should be able to connect up a DRL control unit to a USDM s2k, but most people on this board say it's not that simple. I would think that all the s2k's roll off the same production line, so wouldn't it make sense to build them all with DRL, and just remove the DRL control unit for the US market cars?
To tell the truth when DRL's became mandatory I thought it was stupid, and didn't like it one bit. As time went by I appreciate every saftey advantage I can get.
P.S. No word yet on the wire harness. I will post soon! [/QUOTE]
From what I understand, theoretically we should be able to connect up a DRL control unit to a USDM s2k, but most people on this board say it's not that simple. I would think that all the s2k's roll off the same production line, so wouldn't it make sense to build them all with DRL, and just remove the DRL control unit for the US market cars?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






