S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

first time in a ap2

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 01:23 AM
  #31  
chViETnk's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,158
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

these are very interesting facts, from my own personal experience, i come from driving an MY00 AP1 and have driven a few AP2's, it may just be in our heads but the AP1 is a more "raw" car, it is harder to connect with in driving experience. the clutch feels different(more resistance) and the gearbox/tranny is less forgiving, you have to take a lot more to get use to an AP1 versus an AP2. also what other people are referring to is the more notchy or less luxurious feeling of the transmission. i feel that the AP2 was redesigned by Honda for more of a daily driven vehicle(not saying its good or bad) but of course the AP2 does make more power but i dont believe that is what the OP is referring to, hes referring to the driving experience of both AP1/AP2.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 04:21 AM
  #32  
FluKy15's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 14,697
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Default

I just re-read the thread again, and I have a question for the ap1 owners. You actually like the notchy feelings in the transmission?! It means your gears arent sliding in properly, not that its better...
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 05:03 AM
  #33  
02jdmS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default

This would be a great time for me to rant after the amount of work ive had to do in the past year.
I own an 02 ap1 and recently found out i had a dent in my driveshaft when the bearings in my transmission and differential went out at the same time. I ended up switching over to ap2 transmission, driveshaft, differential and ap2 clutch kit. I kept my ap1 flywheel(resurfaced), slave cylinder and installed omni power clutch master and diffential collars. When I say this car is amazing I mean it. I have driven many ap2's with mine being the first ap1 and feel they are so much less of a car. I've had friends with ap2's drive my car and want to trade on the spot, regardless of year and mileage. With 43,000 miles this has been the love of my life and the car always seems to amaze me. With my oem hardtop and soon to come brake setup and suspension i might as well own a 2002 sebring silver CR.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 09:40 AM
  #34  
ninjajwl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FluKy15
I have driven both ap1 and ap2. Stock and modded. I swear to you guys most of these differences of being so "raw" are all in your head. I would take my 07 ANY day over an ap1, I have the lighter flywheel and I have found a way of driving which never engages my CDV. I didn't really enjoy how the car oversteers itself around a corner, I felt like the limit of it around a corner was too low, cause it didn't feel stable. It could have been the ap1 I drove, but I do hope to try an ap1 on the track some time too!

All this is just my opinion though
I have owned both an AP1 and an AP2; (20,000 miles of DD-duty in my AP1, 2500 miles in my AP2). I currently own an '08 AP2 and have had track time in this car too. I can assure you that the "raw feeling," for the lack of a better term, is not all in my head. If you're changing things out on the car such as the suspension, wheels, alignment, then the oversteer and cornering limits between the cars becomes a moot point. I do not think changing the flywheel or getting a Flashpro for my AP2 would give it the same feeling my AP1 had. The AP2 is a MUCH better DD than the AP1, but not as fun as a weekend car.

I do notice every little thing like how the "thud" from closing the door in my AP2 sounded better than my AP1. (Changing the door panels on my AP1 to the AP2 panels did have the same effect.) I'm probably a bit more nitpicky about my car than other people... I notice a big difference after switching to DBW in pedal feel. The transmission in my AP1 also seemed to shift better, but that could be because I am using OEM transmission fluid in my AP2.

I'd like to try an AP2 with a 9,000 RPM redline.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 10:07 AM
  #35  
2Kaputnik's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,315
Likes: 2
From: North SF Bay, CA
Default

Originally Posted by AP1Driver
I beg to differ. I test drove and AP2 with only 10k on the clock, and it is definetly inferior to the AP1.

End debate. It's settled. That was easy!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 10:20 AM
  #36  
Vyndictive's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NDAZONE
Originally Posted by Vyndictive' timestamp='1318879408' post='21077795
Not to mention I'd really like to write a strongly worded letter to whose cost cutting decision it was to fit the original ap1 with a plastic rear window. "Come-on, Man!"

AP1 drivers are envious of all the nice features on the AP2: a temp gauge worth reading, a clock, a trans tunnel and console that looks like it belongs in the 2000s, not from an 88 fiero, a functioning stereo...
To put things in perspective, back in 2000, 2001 and even 2002 BMW and Porsche were both using Plastic Rear Windows. This was viewed as typical not cheap or a poor man's feature. By the way, since you don't like your carpet, you can upgrade to a real leather console cover by contacting Rick's.
That is a valid point. I guess I was more focused on lusting after what the AP2 has that the AP1 lacks.

The convertible has come a long way in 11 years. From rag-tops with plastic only windows, to glass with defrost, to folding hard tops.

And I'm aware I can change the carpet out, I just wish I didn't have to.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 10:41 AM
  #37  
MBHs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,875
Likes: 5
From: Santa Clartia, Ca
Default

i think the difference is extremely negligible between ap1 and ap2s. for me they were the exact same car and i chose an ap2 because IMO its cosmetically nicer and more modern .
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 10:53 AM
  #38  
NFRAP2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Default

These threads always turn out the same way, most people are going to defend the choice they made in buying AP1 vs. AP2 and nobody is going to change their mind. We all have our reasons for choosing the generation that we chose and all s2ks are great sports cars. I prefer the AP2 for numerous reasons, so that's what I bought... but I don't fault others for buying an AP1 for whatever reason.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 11:09 AM
  #39  
Moddiction's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

I like the AP2 looks exterior and interior more for sure. I only drove a stock AP2 which I did not find that great. Seemed dulled down but of course that does not mean it did not perform as well. Just did not feel as fun. I do love the 9k redline but replacing my motor over the winter I will definitely get an F22 but only since I can raise the rev limit to around 8500 or so which will be enough for me. get some more torque and a little broader powerband for my sc'd setup.
8k regardless if it makes the power earlier I do not find as fun as the AP1 9k. Only my opinion of course.
If I were to buy an S2000 now I would definitely buy an AP2 however. Was a little above how much I wanted to spend 4 years ago when I got my S.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 12:06 PM
  #40  
TheMuffinMan's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by AP1Driver
I beg to differ. I test drove and AP2 with only 10k on the clock, and it is definetly inferior to the AP1. My 02', to me, is head and shoulders above the AP2 from a dynamic standpoint, and it has a ton more miles on it. And the F20 is also more special than another 8k VTEC engine. I would rather have a K20 than an F22 if I had to settle for 8,000 rpm. I wouldn't trade my 02 for ANY AP2, year be damned. AP1 FTW...
You list nothing about if either vehicle was stock, what tires, how you drove them, where you drove them, etc. Added to that you probably did not drive either vehicle to limits so I doubt you could make an accurate observation of one being 'definitely inferior' to the other. What exactly makes an extra 1000 rpms special? You can have the F22 rev up to 8500 rpm, would that change your mind?

And as soon as you modify the suspension or wheels/tires or drivetrain the differences are moot.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 PM.