S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2k short shifter

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 05:04 PM
  #61  
turbo_pwr's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,831
Likes: 2
From: Paradise Valley, AZ miss NYC
Default

Isn't that going to vibrate like crazy?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 05:10 PM
  #62  
jackalope's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
From: Brazoria
Default

woot. i wanna try one. lemme know if any beta testers are in houston so I can hound em to lettin me drive (or if you want a beta tester in houston lemme know!)
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #63  
jzz30's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,946
Likes: 7
From: honolulu, hawaii
Default

i might be wrong but it looks like the leather shifter booty will havs some trouble staying up in place....
i can be the center of the pacific tester in hawaii...hehe
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #64  
exceltoexcel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,938
Likes: 0
From: limerick
Default

How much you asking for this beeotch?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 08:47 PM
  #65  
Richard Paul's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 239
Likes: 3
Default

Izz30, good thinking but I have that covered. The Rx8 had the same size fat part on it. Look at the 8 unit begining of thread, it has a white band on it for that purpose.
The vibration doesn't seem to come through very much, but there does seem to be some noise rigt now. I'm trying to tune that out with shape changes. Harmonics are effected by everything. On the Mazda there is a increase in sound on some cars and not others. Yet the ones that do get it have no objection to it. Seems they like it, adds flavor to the cockpit.

The rotary has a complete different set of problems then the four banger. The inline four just wants to take itself apart because there is no overlap. Thats why it has a rough idle, sometimes requiring a balance shaft. I don't know it the S has one of those or not. The rotary would seem so ideal but you forget it is not totally rotary. The riotor has to traval in a figure eight pattern.

I have no idea how the Honda knows the difference when I change the geometry of the shift arm. The C's does the same thing as mine does. The difference is that I will figure it out before I market it. I wouldn't sell it to you that way.

I just point those things out because there was so much doubt about the ability to improve the stock unit. And there is merit to that as no one has. I'm actually being humble here by saying if I can't get it right I will admit it to you and not market it.

On the other hand it is already better except for that little bit of harmonic that I think I can tune out.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 08:53 PM
  #66  
darkknight1999's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,288
Likes: 0
From: Hopedale, MA
Default

Are you becoming Vendor?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 08:56 PM
  #67  
StinkyTofu's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Default

I like the s2000 shifter alot, but if you can make the shifts feel the same and shorten the throw, hell yeah i'll take one, why not?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #68  
MaxGeek's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 2
From: WA
Default

Looks like this kit saves weight too!!!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 12:54 PM
  #69  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by xviper,Feb 8 2005, 01:05 PM

Don't turn a good first impression into a crappy second impression. Inflammatory statements like:
"My only question is who declared the S2k the standard to go by?"
Will not serve you well here. This is a dedicated S2K site. The owners who are here are just as dedicated to their cars and take great pride in them. And as owners of this car, it is the right of said owners to declare anything they want about their cars. It's called pride of ownership. Until there is a GOD OF CAR OWNERSHIP to make LAW what car owners can or cannot express as THEIR considered "standard", there is NO standard except the one that each owner imposes.
For example, if I so choose to state that I consider my shifter to be "perfect", who is anyone to come along and tell me I'm wrong. A suggestion that something else "might" be worth looking into is OK, but don't insult my pride and joy or my opinion. This is doubly true for someone who hopes to sell something to those same people that the imflammatory statement is directed at.
As already mentioned, you asked for comments. You didn't indicate you only wanted favourable ones.
XV, I haven't read the entire thread yet, but as usual, you're right on the money. However, I've got a question now (and hopefully someone else hasn't asked it later in the thread).

I find it hard to believe that I'm the only one here who's owned a purpose built race car, but then I'm not sure that a Formula V really qualifies. The FV shift linkage is complex because it has to go around several turns to get to the transmission. However, they entire linkage and shift mechanism is based on good solid heim joints, and the result is quite remarkable.

MGA's, MGB's, and Miata's have wonderful shifters, but they could all use a shorter throw. The S2000 shifter is even better, because it has a shorter throw. However, compared to the FV shifter they all feel (for lack of a better word) "rubbery." In fact, they almost feel "numb" in comparison. In the FV it's almost like you can feel the gears sliding on the shaft; you feel everything that's going on inside the gearbox, and I believe that makes fast and accurate shifting a little easier.

I haven't measured the throw on the S2000 shifter, but the FV had a 1" throw from third to fourth and a slightly longer throw from first to second. With all the feedback that's more than enough to get the car in the correct gear every time.

I'd like to try a shifter with better feedback (if that's possible). I'd also like to try a *slightly* shorter throw. A countersunk shift-knob might be the ticket but I can't see how that would improve the fell of the shifter any. Not to say that the feedback is bad *for a street car with the stock shifter*, but it really is a far cry from the best shifters I've used.

Problem is (or might be) noise and/or vibration. A more solid the connection to the shift forks means more vibration at the stick.

If a shift kit does become available, and doesn't cost an arm and a leg, I'll be one of the first to give it a try. If it improves the feel, I'm sure I'll like it.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 01:30 PM
  #70  
S2KPUDDYDAD's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,463
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by turbo_pwr,Mar 23 2005, 09:04 PM
Isn't that going to vibrate like crazy?
I am not trying to steal the thread but I have made my own shifter for the S2K (that is my car) and it looks allot like the one on the right of the photo. There is no added vibration in the shifter but the boot will have to be synched up to hug the shaft.
I am not using the boot, I went all out and made a Ferrari style gate shifter and plate
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 AM.