S2K vs. FD3S
Originally Posted by dogzilla,Nov 7 2007, 10:22 PM
it seems like lots of you guys are biased. I've had 2 FDs, now a S2000 owner, and I like both cars. the reliability of FD wasn't that bad if you do the maintenance on time. I find FD a bit faster than S2K, but S2K has better gas/mileage ratio, and it's newer. However, if I was given a brand new S2K or FD, it will be a really tough choice for me, but a 94 FD and a 06 S2K, I would take the S2K.
drive both cars and buy which ever one speaks to you.
and remember take whatever you read on the internet with a grain of salt.
that's not true, the maintenance didn't cost me anything near ur turbo on the S
maintenance is just changing the oil (cheap dino oil) frequently, as well as changing the fuel filter and flushing the coolant once a year. if you keep stock boost levels you should have no issues with reliablity.
that being said i would buy the s2000 over the rx7
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







