S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

S2ks are in trouble

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 12:47 PM
  #151  
white_turbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=RFCR,Nov 8 2008, 12:33 PM] If
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #152  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Flite,Nov 8 2008, 01:34 PM
Think of it like an old MG or something. It's not about how fast it is compared to other cars. It's about how big a smile it puts on your face.


Old Nov 8, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #153  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Originally Posted by RFCR,Nov 8 2008, 02:33 PM
If you pay GT3 price for a GT3, you will still be making substantial sacrifices. GT3 will force you into a situation of lower reliability (seal leaks common), ultra harsh ride, non streetable ground clearance (scrapage everywhere thats unavoidable), torque steer, higher maintenance requirements and adjustments (despite factory claim of low maintenance intervals), rear weight bias, loud as hell at speed (much louder than S2000, rattles like bucket of nuts (after break-in), lower back pain due to harshness of ride coupled with painful ergonomics (biased towards support rather than comfort), hot boot area (cooling system runs in front causing a very hot storage compartment), much more expensive maintenance cost for services, shorter lifespan (debatable), and the ever noticeable cost of entry for a GT3 (over twice the price of an S).

The S has and will remain a classic niche vehicle, a roadster, more rare than a 911, less capable as an all-out racing machine than GT3, uniquely designed(chassis/engine/configuration). The S is more nostalgia than anything at this point. I don't believe the S keeps up with modern goal of an all around racing car, but you do get a car that was designed as a cruising roadster that can spank cars around tighter tracks, while maintaining daily practicality.

I would also suggest reading a brochure for the GT3 and its mention of how daily usable it is. Then go out and actually live with a GT3 on a daily basis. For the reasons above, you will realize that what Porsche describes about their GT3 is not very true, as that machine is a monster on the track, but as a result, compromises daily usability and practicality when compared to other sports cars.


Dude, have you ever driven a GT3? I have (a friend owns one), and find your comments laughable. No, they're not the best daily drivers, but I'm wondering where you came up w/ some of those claims.
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 05:34 PM
  #154  
8kGoodENuff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,452
Likes: 6
From: Northeast Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Flite,Nov 8 2008, 03:34 PM
Think of it like an old MG or something. It's not about how fast it is compared to other cars. It's about how big a smile it puts on your face.
Oh man... I really wish I could drive an MG. I actually had a dream that I was driving one not that long ago and it was fun... lol.

Andre
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 05:52 PM
  #155  
sdsS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Default

yeah i undstand him.. its running around the same HP as they did 9 years ago.. while every other company is stepping it up. Why change a good thing? is true.. but they should give us a faster alternative as to F/I or a more HP engine.
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 12:19 AM
  #156  
theonlineguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
From: the bay
Default

Originally Posted by hansai00,Nov 6 2008, 10:16 AM
I think the only problem is with people who own S2k's who ever thought their car was fast in a straight line.
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 05:57 AM
  #157  
Squirtle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 0
Default

Alright mah nikkah'z. I iz gon' break dis down fo j00.

OP just said he felt the car could use a little more power.

Simple "sure" or "i don't think so" would have answered this troll and saved us the hassle of having to read 7 pages of COMPLETE AND UTTER BULLSHIET.

Give me back my life, now.
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 07:41 AM
  #158  
zoomkat's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Squirtle,Nov 9 2008, 06:57 AM
Alright mah nikkah'z. I iz gon' break dis down fo j00.
Don't eat all your medication at one time!
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 08:02 AM
  #159  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

I'd rather have 500 lb. less weight than 50 more hp.
Old Nov 9, 2008 | 08:12 AM
  #160  
dan_uk's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA, USA
Default

If you want something that you can track/auto-x + race people off the lights with the new Z is looking good

I love my s2000, its just way more fun to drive than anything else I've tried no matter what HP/torque



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:35 AM.