S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

"Skip shifting is brutal" ?!

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #31  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE=Boofster,Oct 15 2006, 06:04 AM] This does make sense theoretically but I can't visualize why would you need this physically.
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 10:06 AM
  #32  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally Posted by INDYMAC,Oct 15 2006, 10:00 AM
Wow! I didn't think there would be so much discussion about this topic. It's seems pretty straight forward to me. The S2000 tranny is probably the best 6 spd gearbox any of us will ever use, and you're complaining about having to shift through all the gears? Why did you buy the car if you didn't look forward to this exhilarating oportunity each and every time you pushed that start button? It seems to me that lugging the little Honda motor would be the last thing I would want to do while driving it too. If you're disappointed in your S2000 purchase, go drive a brand new Porche 911 with a short throw gearbox and you will realize then how lucky you have it!
I can see that you probably understand why I don't see any of this as indicative of a flawed design.

People buy S2000's for all manner of reasons, and drive them in an infinite variety of ways. Some have a hard time with the gearbox, and I think that's both OK, and to be expected. Guys like you and I, who love to shift, sometimes need to help some of them out a little. It's all good.
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #33  
timg's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 35
From: Decatur, GA
Default

I did skip shift, I do skip shift, and I will continue to skip shift.

I think there are two keys to doing it without damage.
1. Let the revs drop to the appropriate level before engaging the new gear. You need to give the gears and the motor time to slow down a bit.
2. The higher you rev, the larger the difference will be in RPM between the shifts. The closer you are to idle, the less wear skip shifting will cause. I don't skip shift above 5500-6000 rpm.

Tim
Old Oct 15, 2006 | 07:12 PM
  #34  
hirev's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,531
Likes: 15
From: SF Bay Area
Default

i agree with timp,what he said. i have this car for 3 years and 25,000 plus miles, the trans works perfectly, with skip shifts...not abuse, vetc every day for sure, etc...just don't abuse your car and it should be just fine. listen to what is says, feel when it protests, use the gearbox and gas pedal together, etc...
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 05:13 AM
  #35  
AssassinJN's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,802
Likes: 5
Default

If you are skip-shifting coming down (where most people would) in speed, then I would suggest double clutching. Since you aren't accelerating a double-clutch can be as slow as you like and will help your syncros to live a long time with no problems.

To double clutch if you are unsure, you shift into neutral, release the clutch, slow to the speed you want, then clutch in, shift into gear, clutch out again.

As far as skip-shifting going up in gears, I would suggest "rowing" through the gears or double clutching since it will help to get your transmission up to speed so that your syncros do less work.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 07:26 AM
  #36  
Wildncrazy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,771
Likes: 2
Default

I posted on a couple of other car threads to see if they'd ever heard of skip shifting being a prob. It seems that veryone does it as a matter of course and no other car manufacturer that I can find has a prob.

I understand the fun of rowing thru the gears, I'd never have an automatic in a performance car, but that isn't the point. The point is that reasonable expectations would have that a transmission on a car of this calibre and price would have a transmission that would perform at least as well as other trannies. In this day and age there's no excuse for a problem like this.

I love the feel of the shifting and I like the power handling capacities, but no matter how you try to justify it there is no way you can say that with the number of synchro issues we see reported here and how often people get slapped down for skip shifting that there is no problem.

The tranny even encourages you to skip shift on a downshift. When coming from 6th or 5th the transmission automatically lines up for a 3rd gear downshift. Many people say transmissions are spring loaded to automatically select 3rd. This is a standard feature on every modern tranny.

As far as double clutching &/or downshifting and skipping gears I think the rev matching is what makes either of them work.

Should I have to double clutch a street tranny? I'd have to say no.

I understand what I have to do to work around the weak tranny design, my point is that I shouldn't have to. Will it drive me away from the S? Never. But it has given the S a reputation for a weak tranny and it does drive others away before they own one.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 08:13 AM
  #37  
C U AT 9K's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 17,163
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by clawhammer,Oct 14 2006, 09:57 PM
The way to properly skip shift on an upshift would be to move the shifter into the gear that you're skipping, but not letting the clutch out and shifting into the desired gear. For example:

you're in 2nd, push clutch in, shift to 3rd, shift to 4th, let clutch out.
thats what i've done in all manual cars ive driven
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 08:25 AM
  #38  
bat711's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
Default

Great! Me rowing gears like a maniac is now a Honda approved activity.

Excuse me while I go perform some preventative maintenance.

Honestly I don't see why their would be a problem skipping upshifts as long as you aren't slamming 2nd to 6th and not letting the RPMs come down before putting it back into gear.

This just sounds like a warning saying hey are synchros our a weak point be careful.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:44 AM
  #39  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by hondabert,Oct 14 2006, 07:25 AM
I guess I don't understand this fully... why wouldn't it be ok to skip shift as long as you're matching revs and speed appropriately?
It would be, but not many people know how to match revs.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #40  
floridawriter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Orlando area
Default

Originally Posted by FearlessFife,Oct 14 2006, 07:33 AM
So what is the best way to approach a stop light....from a engine and tranny longevity stand-point? Some say just throw it into neutral and roll up using the brakes to stop, others think its best to be downshifting all the way to first while decelerating....and then some say down shift and let the clutch do some of the work stopping the car (I majorily disagree with that one).

I personally downshift while decelerating and rev-match.....
There is a simple answer: brakes are a whole lot cheaper to replace than a clutch or your transmission. the transmission should never be used for braking.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:12 AM.