S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Why is it that there are so many...

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 02:03 PM
  #221  
Jason Saini's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Yep, an S2000 won in '00, and it was Gary Thomason at the wheel. He has won many National Championships in the past, and set his car up well from the beginning. Others have taken a little longer to set up the Boxster, but they are getting very fast (running on 18x8" front and 18x9" rear wheels). Gary sold his and moved to a Vette for '01.

I was third this season, behind a Boxster and another S2000. The other S2000 happened to be Gary Thomason's old one! Hopefully I can move up 2 places next season!
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 02:10 PM
  #222  
Strike's Avatar
Former Moderator
25 Year Member
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,826
Likes: 5
From: Denver CO
Default

Jason,

With regards to Streets of Willow, there were 20+ S2000's there. While many of the S2K drivers were new to track driving there were also many with a lot of track experience. Not one person mentioned anything like bump steer, snap oversteer, or any other term that's been used to describe this behavior. I also don't remember it being mentioned at the Thunderhill event where we had another 25 S2000's on the track. It's experiences like those two days, along with my own personal experience, that helps form my opinion that this behavior only causes problems under certain specific sets of circumstances.

BTW, you haven't offended me in the least. I respect your opinions even if I sometimes don't agree. I also think we're closer to agreeing on this issue than it would seem but the medium we're using to discuss this tends to make things seem more black and white than they sometimes are.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 02:10 PM
  #223  
Tonky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,446
Likes: 1
From: West Mids.
Default

Jason:

Are these Boxster S's?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 02:20 PM
  #224  
Jason Saini's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Strike, I hear what you are saying... and it has taken a very long time for me, as an experienced racer, to identify some of these suspension issues. Who buys a new car and immediately tests bump-steer? It's been a long time coming to draw some of these conclusions. I don't expect the average driver to be able to identify bump-steer although I think that many people feel it and don't understand it. So even at a track day like the ones you described, and even if someone spun - they might not necessarily be able to attribute it to bump-steer.

And Cedric... they are Boxster 2.7 non-S's with the M030 suspension package (factory option) and the 18" wheel package. I drove one on a test day earlier this season, and while it doesn't have the ultimate power of the S2000, it sure has more grip with those wide wheels! wow! It's a cool car, with a slightly different character than the S2000, but a very prohibitive price tag! Even if they were the same price, I would still race the S2000... I think it has a much higher cool factor. And I never want to be a Porsche snob!
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 02:29 PM
  #225  
Tonky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,446
Likes: 1
From: West Mids.
Default

Jason I looked at aTT and a Boxster and test drove both before I bought the S2000. The Boxster was a 2.4 I'm pretty sure. I liked it but the S2000 had loads more zing!

So are the Boxster S's in a higher class?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 02:40 PM
  #226  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Should we develop a new category called "I just want to argue with somebody"?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 02:44 PM
  #227  
Jason Saini's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally posted by Cedric Tomkinson
Jason I looked at aTT and a Boxster and test drove both before I bought the S2000. The Boxster was a 2.4 I'm pretty sure. I liked it but the S2000 had loads more zing!

So are the Boxster S's in a higher class?
Yup... the S's are in a higher class. The 2.7's have 217hp, 23 shy of our car which is a significant difference. The first couple years of the base Boxster it was 2.5, which is probably what you drove. They were pretty anemic compared to the S2000! Although they may have had a 2.4 in the UK... you guys get all the low-displacement hardware... Price of petrol and all!
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 02:50 PM
  #228  
Tonky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,446
Likes: 1
From: West Mids.
Default

Originally posted by Triple-H
Should we develop a new category called "I just want to argue with somebody"?
They changed the name to 'Street Encounters'.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 03:14 PM
  #229  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

Couple quick points...

Great thread - the most useful/interesting thread I've seen in S2000 talk in several months.

Whoever posted "Honda hasn't made a rear wheel drive car in many many years. Therefore the Honda enthusiasts have gotten used to the behavior of front wheel drive vehicles" is apparently ignoring the Honda NSX, which is an Acura to us yanks... You're right about being used to FWD, there's not too many RWD vehicles out there that don't share many of the same nasty/fun traits as the S2000...

Jason & Nick: Having spent some time at G-man, and knowing my approximate lap times, along with those of several other S2000s, what kind of lap times have you been turning? Admittedly neither of you runs a "stock" car, but I'm just curious to know how far off the pace I am...
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2001 | 03:16 PM
  #230  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

Originally posted by Triple-H
Should we develop a new category called "I just want to argue with somebody"?
Some forums have these... and they can be a load of fun... But because of the nature of this site and the fact that many of the owners/enthusiasts may eventually meet, I think it'd be best to avoid the hard feelings that extended intentional arguing can create.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 PM.